SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Softechie who wrote (17954)4/24/2003 12:21:09 PM
From: T L Comiskey  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
WMD.........
Walmart
McDonalds
DairyQueen

They be 'On the Way'
T



To: Softechie who wrote (17954)4/24/2003 12:24:47 PM
From: T L Comiskey  Respond to of 89467
 
Whats in a name.........
'By their Works ..you shall know them...."
The Naz

Annan Labels Coalition 'Occupying Force'
2 hours, 42 minutes ago

By JONATHAN FOWLER, Associated Press Writer

GENEVA - U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan (news - web sites) called Thursday on the U.S.-led coalition to respect international law as the "occupying power" in Iraq (news - web sites), drawing immediate ire from U.S. officials.






"I hope the coalition will set an example by making clear that they intend to act strictly within the rules" governing occupations, Annan told the U.N. Human Rights Commission.

The United States responded that it had not been established whether the coalition that toppled Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s regime was an occupying power under international law but that coalition forces were nevertheless abiding by international conventions.

"We've not only made that clear by our words — we've made it clear from day one of this conflict through our actions," U.S. envoy Kevin Moley told reporters. "We find it — at best — odd that the secretary-general chose to bring this to our attention."

Annan cited the 1949 Geneva Conventions and the 1907 Hague Convention, accords that set down the responsibilities of occupiers — ranging from maintaining public order to collecting taxes.

"We're simply saying that the issue of an occupying power has not yet been dealt with," Moley said.

"We'll come to that and we'll presumably come to that quickly," he said, adding that in the meantime, the coalition was conforming with international accords.

Last week, Brig. Gen. Vincent Brooks, deputy operations director at U.S. Central Command, said the United States did not currently consider itself an occupying power in Iraq. Rather, he said the coalition was a "liberating force" — a category that does not exist in the Geneva or Hague conventions.

"While there may be a number of similarities to what the Geneva Convention describes, that's not a category that we have stated publicly at this point," Brooks said. "Whether that changes over time needs to be seen."

Moley also said he was angered that Annan cited "the decision to go to war without specific authorization by the U.N. Security Council."

"This is an egregious misstatement of the facts of our going to war in Iraq," the U.S. envoy said.

Annan refused to comment as he left the human rights commission. The United Nations (news - web sites) said he was returning to New York.

The international community was deeply divided over the legality of the U.S.-led attack.

The United States and Britain said they could legally go to war against Iraq under U.N. resolutions dating from 1991 ordering Saddam to disarm. They also noted that Resolution 1441, adopted in November, required Iraq to cooperate with U.N. arms inspectors or face "serious consequences."

Washington also said Saddam's presumed weapons arsenal amounted to an imminent threat and therefore justified pre-emptive strikes.

Other Security Council members — chiefly France, Germany and Russia — disagreed. They said inspections of Iraq's arsenal were working, meaning the country could be peacefully disarmed.

Annan said the coalition decision to act "created deep divisions that will need to be bridged if we are to deal effectively, not just with the aftermath in Iraq, but with other major challenges on the international agenda."



To: Softechie who wrote (17954)4/24/2003 3:47:00 PM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 89467
 
Still waiting for Da Idiot to find WMD

Have you been hired to find WMD???



To: Softechie who wrote (17954)4/24/2003 4:46:55 PM
From: Jim Willie CB  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467
 
nah, they wont find any... wont matter later anyway

in the meantime, not finding gives a green light for going after Syria
either physically or diplomatically
so far only with huge diplomatic pressure

the gunboat is winning this table match
/ jim



To: Softechie who wrote (17954)4/24/2003 4:47:09 PM
From: Jim Willie CB  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Appel on Canadian Juniors seeing nice Can$ dividend

A Canadian Dollar bull market will greatly benefit holders of Canadian gold mining equities
Dr Richard Appel
Financial Insights
April 23, 2003

321gold.com

a clip:
If I am correct, not only will American investors greatly benefit from the unfolding Bull Market in Canadian junior exploration companies, but they will simultaneously enormously gain from the appreciation that I foresee for the Canadian Dollar. This will truly be a windfall profit which can add an additional 20% or more to the higher portfolio value, that I believe the Bull Market in Canadian mining stocks is destined to bestow upon its investors.