Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (156471)	4/25/2003 5:42:30 PM
From: GST	Respond to of 164684

Liz -- I understand and agree completely.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (156471)	4/25/2003 8:14:24 PM
From: Oeconomicus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

I find it ironic that such a huge number of people would support impeaching a president over something as stupid as lying about sex (as if those in favor of impeachment have never lied about sex themselves)- while they give Bush a passing grade for lying about something as important as to whether US national security is at stake wrt WMDs in iraq or any other country... WMDs were a lie, pure and simple. So, a "huge number of people" want to impeach the president? From what do you draw that conclusion, Lizzie? That someone put up a Web site and is trying to get money from suckers like you to pay lawyers to waste all our time? Lies, you say? Was the UN lying, too, or do you think WMDs are not something that we should be concerned about? Maybe they're only important if the economy is going gangbusters? Lizzie, there has been tons of evidence of Iraqi WMD programs, both before and since the war. Even the UN said so. But you dismiss it all because they haven't found a big warehouse of stockpiled chem or bio munitions yet. Now you want to impeach the president for doing his job. You have the patience and attention span of a spoiled three year old, Lizzie.