SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Don Earl who wrote (306)4/26/2003 10:14:02 AM
From: rrufff  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20039
 
All of your posts that claim "facts" are really allegations that investigations were not pursued as thoroughly as possible.

I'm not going to disagree with that. I suspect that we will see more investigations either governmental or through the press and I welcome that.

However, the "fact" that an investigation was not as thorough as you might have wished or as I might have wished does not make a conspiracy. There may be many reasons why investigations are not as thorough as can be. I'm not saying it's right or wrong as I tend to like thorough investigations.

Many posters, including myself, have been asking you for facts of the conspiracy and also stating that your theories do not hold water because of the vast number of people who would have to remain silent. Investigators, after the fact, remaining silent or being silenced perhaps for funding reasons, is not what we seek for factual evidence.

It seems you have nothing of fact and cannot refute the fact that nobody has stepped forward and leaked something. This leads rational thinkers to believe that there was not a conspiracy by Bush, the USA or associates to do 9/11.

As I posted before, I've done a lot of work investigating the JFK assassination theories. What makes those theories interesting are the FACTS that are presented, the logic and the fact that trails end with the deaths of perhaps hundreds of key witnesses. Even then, there is no clear case one way or another.

With the theory posited on this thread, there are no real facts other than it happened, George Bush didn't look surprised on tv, took some anti-anthrax meds and investigations (some of which are ongoing) have been incomplete or less than thorough. And of course there were a bunch of Israelis on site. It has been not been proven that they were Mossad, dancing, Hi 5 ing, celebrating. In fact, they were interrogated and incarcerated by the very people with whom they would be working in the conspiracy. Yet, that doesn't stop posters from posting each of those as being proven or unquestionable.

BTW - how do you know that the sky is blue?