SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: NOW who wrote (18104)4/26/2003 8:14:44 PM
From: Clappy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
or just lonely?

Probably that is it.

There is a void inside of him.

A hole.

Some how the arguing helps him to distract himself from it.

I should know. I got one too.
But arguing doesn't always do it for me.
I've got a whole list of distractions, though.

Someday I'll fill that hole and won't need the distractions.

Until then you'll still see me here goofing off or mixing
it up with him on occasions when my other distractions
aren't working.

-AHole



To: NOW who wrote (18104)4/26/2003 9:57:05 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Why do you pinheads hate the truth...??? Does it threaten your little fantasy wrold???



To: NOW who wrote (18104)4/27/2003 8:58:35 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 89467
 
Ah reality..... it can jar one's self deception & actually
promote clear thought. Scary stuff that.



To: NOW who wrote (18104)4/27/2003 10:36:16 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 89467
 
The Times “Core Principles” of Hypocrisy

In its editorial, “The Class Action Unfairness Act,” the
Times expresses respect for “core principles of
federalism.” Nice to see the Times suddenly stand up for
states’ rights—at least, when it may block conservative
ideas of tort reform.

But what happens to the Times sacred principles of
federalism when it comes to liberal laws it likes? Then
federalism is just awful. Last week, the same editorial
page accused a Federalist Society lawyer of “setting back
the rights of the disabled” by convincing the Supreme Court
individuals could not bring Americans with Disabilities Act
suits against states in federal court.

timeswatch.org



To: NOW who wrote (18104)4/27/2003 10:37:50 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 89467
 
Krugman’s Persecution Complex

Columnist Paul Krugman's latest concludes in typical
conservative-bashing mode: “The right is likely to ram
through even more tax cuts, while using deficits as an
excuse for not helping the uninsured. But we have the right
to ask why. And claiming that those who don't support tax
cuts are somehow unpatriotic is not an answer.”

Do liberals have a guilty conscience on patriotism? They
assert it more than those supposedly jingoistic
conservatives. And Times Watch is curious to know
(Krugman’s persecution complex notwithstanding) just who
out there is claiming “those who don’t support tax cuts are
unpatriotic.”

timeswatch.org