Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: space (Hijacked) who wrote (15943)	4/26/2003 6:17:18 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander	Respond to of 21614

Especially considering the little 12-15 year wee-wees who were there already. As well as the habit of Rumsfeld to answer a different question than he was asked, when too difficult, probably a skill aquired at an early age as it takes some skills to make it a natural pavlovian reflex. It is then up to the political and buiness system to sort out those pavlovians. btw, I would not agree calling a C-SPAN thing a "piece" as they provide nothing but one, or very sometimes two, cameras going on and off. However, they made it clear that it was only a matter of getting to the rope of the roped off space for Rumsfeld. Just some aassociations with the famous Dulles' fllights to latin america, but nobody said a good propaganda-spin cannot be used twice. However, what is the matter with Pam Hess, a lot of neurons missing?? She is not even a blonde, no natural reason to be as empty headed as some might hope?? But anyway, she looks happy, maybe it is just a hair-problem, plus those glasses

To: space (Hijacked) who wrote (15943)	4/26/2003 6:32:25 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander	Respond to of 21614

OK, I got it , thanks to Wee-wee, Pam Hess thinks Rumsfeld is really sexy, all that charm, she would really like to give him a personal honeymoon in practice, as she feels he has missed that, give it for many, many moones (smart for elderly men and those young females ones who feel excited)

To: space (Hijacked) who wrote (15943)	4/27/2003 12:10:20 PM
From: Edscharp	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 21614

space, "They [USA] were calling for the respect of the Geneva convention when it served their purpose. Yet they show no respect at all for the same convention wiith regards to the prisoners at Guantanamo" The prisoners at Gitmo are terrorists, not soldiers. They wore no uniforms and fought for el-Qaeda, not a sovereign country. By any international convention they are regarded as murderers. Aside from the fact that they are being confined the treatment they are receiving is the best. Their religious practices are respected, their allowed to send and receive mail, they eat well and they are getting better medical care than they had in their own countries.