Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ChrisJP who wrote (328)	4/27/2003 8:15:22 AM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Chris, You've just exposed yourself as a shill. This wasn't an exercise in you deploying political skills at managing to change the subject when tough questions were thrown your way. As an American, I'm am alarmed that there are people like you around who are being completely dishonest and are unwilling to engage in getting at the truth about what happened on Sept. 11, 2001. You have made me very angry with you ability to comprehend what is at stake here, and your willingness to involve yourself as part of the cover-up effort. Have you no decency, sir?

To: ChrisJP who wrote (328)	4/27/2003 6:07:36 PM
From: Don Earl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Chris, You seem to arbitrarily combine fact, with fiction, with innuendo, with inconsequentialities. If proper procedure was followed, all 4 planes would have been intercepted before reaching their targets. From the time it was known a plane was off course and had ceased transmitting, 15 minutes max is what the Air Force is trained for. A comedy of errors is the least likely explanation, and the lack of an independent public investigation makes it even less probable. The obvious slow down could have been accomplished with a tactic as simple as that used by shoplifters. One person distracts the clerk while the other pulls the job. By the time the clerk realizes something is going on behind their back, it's too late and the distracter can't be connected with doing anything illegal. <<<2. Why did the WTC attacks only kill something like 2000 people when usually 50,000 people work there ? 3. Why did the DC attack hit the most solid building in Washington DC, the ONLY SECTION to have been recently renovated -- not only strengthened, but also empty ? By the way -- the Pentagon Brass offices are on the opposite side facing the Potomac River.>>> Why indeed. And why were only 4 anthrax letters mailed? What kind of person would have a motive to both cause death and keep casualties to a minimum at the same time? <<<4. Why was Osama bin Laden telling people "Wait, there's more" after the 1st plane hit the WTC ?>>> What is the source of your hearsay? <<<5. Under what administration did the hi-jackers enter the country and begin operating ? Hint: It was before the 2000 election.>>> Hint: You're lying. <<<6. Why was the order given to evacuate the White House and Old Executive Office building minutes before the plane hit the Pentagon ? Women were told to take their heeled shoes off so they could get as much distance between them and the buildings in what little time they had. 7. Why did authoritizes and the news tell us there were as many as 6 possible hijacked planes -- with at least one that might make DC its target -- resulting in the immediate evacuation of Washington DC (after the plane hit the Pentagon) ? Why not just tell everyone "That was it, show's over" after the 1st plane hit ?>>> What does 6 or 7 have to do with anything? Let me guess, you want to spend 10-20 posts discussing a red herring. Right?

To: ChrisJP who wrote (328)	4/28/2003 10:51:08 AM
From: Rock_nj	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20039

2. Why did the WTC attacks only kill something like 2000 people when usually 50,000 people work there ? 3. Why did the DC attack hit the most solid building in Washington DC, the ONLY SECTION to have been recently renovated -- not only strengthened, but also empty ? By the way -- the Pentagon Brass offices are on the opposite side facing the Potomac River. Hmmm. Both items 2 and 3 that you listed, if anything, point more towards the conspiracy direction than not. If the conspirators wanted to invoke shock and cause the least amount of civillian causalties possible they would attack the WTC at a time when it's not fully occupied and attack a part of the Pentagon that is mostly empty. I wonder why the terrorists didn't aim for the part of the Pentagon that houses the brass? Perhaps they weren't that sophisticated to figure out where the brass were located. But, again, you have to wonder why Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and other top Pentagon officials didn't evacuate the building after the knew the WTC was hit by a second plane and perhaps knew that a plane that had taken off from DC had been hijacked and had turned around and was heading back towards DC? Oh, 9/11 is the ultimate conspiracy to ponder.