To: Elmer Flugum who wrote (16017 ) 4/27/2003 9:35:27 PM From: Brumar89 Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21614 My land does not encompass "Treaty" land. What do you mean by this - that it wasn't acquired by treaty from the Indians? It most likely was although the treaties in that region were forced on them under threat of extermination. >>>>Ancestors of present day members of the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community lived in the Willamette Valley, the surrounding mountains and the northern portion of the Oregon coast.<<<<<grandronde.org >>>>>By the 1850s there was increasing pressure to remove the Indians from their ancestral lands. In 1850 the Federal government offered free land to settlers who would open up farms in Oregon. Prior to the passage of the Oregon Donation Land Act of September 27, 1850 (9 Stat. 496) there was no legislation by which settlers could acquire title to their lands. The Donation Land Act was passed by the Congress before treaties had been negotiated providing for extinguishment of Indian title to the land. There was growing conflict between Indians attempting to defend their homes and non-Indians who coveted Indian farms and village sites and who demanded that the Indians be removed. By 1855 lawless frontier elements were advocating extermination of the Indians. Land cession treaties were hurriedly concluded with a view to clearing the legal impediment to white settlement.<<<<<<grandronde.org >>>>The Indians who were removed to the Grand Ronde Reservation in 1856 were forced out of their ancient homelands in desperate circumstances. Joel Palmer, Superintendent of Indian Affairs for Oregon Territory, negotiated the seven ratified treaties concluded with these bands. In November 1855, before the treaty with the Molalla was negotiated, he selected the site of the Grand Ronde Reservation and initiated purchase of the Donation Claims in the area. In a letter to the Commissioner of Indian Affairs, Palmer wrote: * In order to secure the acquiescence of the citizens in the removal of the Indians to that point I am compelled to purchase and pay for several of the land acquisition claims that will be occupied. This the Department may deem an unwarranted assumption on my part, but I can conceive of no other means by which to avert an impending calamity involving the destruction of these bands and a blot upon our national reputation. The prospective destruction of the bands was described in a letter which Palmer sent in December 1855 to Major-General John Wool, Commander of the Pacific Division: The existence of a war of extermination by our citizens against all Indians in Southern Oregon which by recent acts appears to evince a determination to carry it out, in violation of all treaty stipulations, and the common usages of civilized nations, has induced me to take steps to remove friendly bands of Indians now assembled at Fort Lane and upon Umpqua Reservation, to an encampment on the headwaters of the Yam Hill River, distant about sixty miles south west of Vancouver and adjoining the Coast Reservation. This plan has been adopted with a view of saving the lives of such of those Indians as have given just and reasonable assurances of friendship.<<<<< grandronde.org ;Where is the settlement? Look our your window. It is already valuable, but what is given in return is not so valuable. What do you want in return? You'd no longer be a moral hypocrite. That's not worth anything?