Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sciAticA errAticA who wrote (32585)	4/28/2003 8:49:55 AM
From: sciAticA errAticA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

Average pay is dropping for first time since 1980s David Leonhardt, New York Times Published April 28, 2003 For the first time since the 1980s, the average pay of workers at all income levels is falling. The pay of the nation's top earners has become the most recent to fall behind inflation. The weekly salary of workers at the 90th percentile of earners -- those who earn more than nine-tenths of all workers -- fell 1.4 percent over the past year, to $1,439, according to an analysis of government data by the Economic Policy Institute, a research group in Washington, D.C. The inflation-adjusted weekly pay of the median worker -- the one at the point where half of salaries are above and half are below -- fell 1.5 percent between early last year and early this year, according to the Labor Department. It was the biggest drop since the mid-1990s. After more than two years of canceling investments in new equipment and laying off workers, many companies are turning to the pay of remaining employees as they try to stay profitable during an economic slowdown. The weak labor market, which has lost more than 2 million jobs in the past two years, is allowing them to restrain pay without fear of losing workers, executives say. The pay stagnation has ended the best period of salary growth in 30 years. Eastman Chemical cut the pay of its 15,000 employees at least 3 percent. At American Airlines, Boeing and Weirton Steel, unionized workers have recently voted to reduce their own wages in an effort to save their jobs. "Some of the salaries had gone sky high," said Vinod Kumar Gupta, the chief executive of InfoUSA, a company based in Omaha that sells consumer databases to marketers and recently cut all annual pay above $30,000 by one-tenth. "We had people in $40,000 jobs, and we had no choice but to pay them $80,000 because there was a shortage of people." Now, Gupta said, "We're not having any trouble finding new people." The stagnation of wages has helped many companies report surprisingly good profits in recent weeks, even as demand for their products remains weak and health care costs have soared. But the wage slowdown is also leaving many households with less money to spend, helping to make the current economic recovery the weakest in decades. "You can find jobs that run from minimum wage into $8 or $9 an hour. Most of them don't have benefits of any type, and a lot of it is just part-time work," said Bob McCullough, a 49-year-old carpenter, explaining why he and his colleagues at Weirton Steel in West Virginia voted this year to cancel a $1-an-hour raise and replace it with a 5 percent pay cut. "As far as the kinds of jobs that pay the wages we earn, they're just not here any more," said McCullough, who makes a little more than $50,000 a year. By contrast, between 1997 and 2002, the weekly pay of the median worker rose almost 9 percent to $656, after adjusting for inflation. The gains effectively erased almost two decades of declining pay. High earners did even better, with those at the 90th percentile receiving a 14.2 percent raise between 1997 and 2002. Over the past year, however, many affluent workers have had to accept an effective pay cut as their employers have realized that the weak job market has left them with few options. For all the reasons that companies cite for cutting pay, however, the biggest one is simply that they are able to. "It took a long time for the pressure of the full-employment economy to dissipate," said Jared Bernstein, an economist at the Economic Policy Institute, a group backed by foundations and labor unions. "But it's gone." startribune.com