Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (96643)	4/28/2003 1:04:45 PM
From: Sun Tzu	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

Like I said, repeating it as you like, without evidence or at least a decent logical hypothesis, it remain nonsense. Just how do these thousands of Iranians survive in Iraq? Iranians cannot make the simplest arabic phrase and would not be able to do simple day to day tasks let alone orate and incite the public sentiments. Nor is Arabic an easy language to learn for non-natives (trust me, I have tried). And do you think the hundreds of thousands of Iraqis who live in Iran have no interest in going back?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (96643)	4/28/2003 1:11:12 PM
From: Win Smith	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Right. And Rummy would never lie, would he? He won the war. Never mind that the war he fought was essentially Pollack's war. Not Neocon war plan 1, which was Chalabi + air power, aka Bay of Pigs redux. Not Neocon war plan 2 either, which was 50k troops max. Never mind, the PNAC people are always right, and they got legions of allied pundits to make sure their revisionist history du jour gets maximal exposure. Who's Rummy got penciled in for Powell's replacement, anyway? Will the Prince of Darkness make a comeback?