SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: calgal who wrote (1860)4/28/2003 6:01:09 PM
From: Glenn Petersen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10965
 
Kerry and Dean mix it up:

Kerry, Dean campaigns spar over U.S. military

Monday, April 28, 2003 Posted: 5:31 PM EDT (2131 GMT)

cnn.com

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Divisions between rival Democratic presidential candidates John Kerry and Howard Dean over the strength of the nation's military broke out in the open Monday, signaling escalating tensions between the two campaigns in the party's race for the White House.

The debate began over Dean's comments in an article posted Monday on Time.com. "We have to take a different approach" to diplomacy, the former Vermont governor was quoted as saying during a campaign stop in New Hampshire. "We won't always have the strongest military."

Kerry spokesman Chris Lehane issued a statement expressing incredulity over Dean's remarks and saying that Kerry, a decorated Vietnam War veteran, would "guarantee that America has the strongest, best trained, most well-equipped military in history."

"Howard Dean's stated belief that the United States won't always have the strongest military raises serious questions about his capacity to serve as commander in chief," Lehane said. "No serious candidate for the presidency has ever before suggested that he would compromise or tolerate an erosion of America's military supremacy."

In an interview, Kerry declined to comment further, other than to say he supports the statement. "I never want our military to be second to anybody," he said during a campaign stop in Little Rock, Arkansas.

Dean campaign manager Joe Trippi responded with his own written statement, calling Lehane's comments absurd. Trippi said Dean would never tolerate an erosion of American military power, but the war on terrorism cannot be won by relying solely on military power and must include diplomacy.

"Governor Dean believes that even the most sophisticated military in the world acting alone cannot eliminate all sleeper terrorist cells, nor should it be called upon to take on every dictator for the purpose of regime change," Trippi said.

Trippi said if Kerry supports Bush's approach to foreign policy "then John Kerry is running for the nomination of the wrong party, because the Bush doctrine of pre-emptive war must stop here."

Lehane said the Trippi statement is a "non-answer response (that) doesn't explain the unexplainable or defend the indefensible, his statement in Time Magazine that America wouldn't always have the strongest military."

Polls from New Hampshire show Kerry and Dean in a tight race in that early primary state, which borders their home states. Kerry, considered an early front-runner in the Democratic primary, had a strong lead in New Hampshire until recent weeks when Dean closed the gap while speaking out against the U.S.-led war in Iraq.

Dean has singled Kerry out for criticism on the campaign trail, accusing him of having an unclear position on the Iraq war. The Massachusetts lawmaker refused to respond to Dean on that issue.

In an interview, Trippi criticized Kerry for sending "his boys out" to criticize Dean instead of answering questions about his own position.

"This is crass politics," he said. "This is an important debate about what kind of country we are going to be in the international community and there is no serious candidate running for president of the United States who doesn't believe in maintaining America's military strength in the world. John Kerry knows that, his campaign knows that."



To: calgal who wrote (1860)4/29/2003 12:26:05 PM
From: Tadsamillionaire  Respond to of 10965
 
Slow start for Gephardt in Iowa money primary
By Sam Dealey

Where Rep. Richard Gephardt needs the most help to advance his presidential prospects, he isn’t getting it — at least publicly.

Early support from two chief constituencies — Iowans and organized labor — that are essential to the White House hopes of the Missouri Democrat has been surprisingly tepid so far.

Documents filed with the Federal Election Commission show that Gephardt reported raising a scant $1,000 in all from only three donors in Iowa in the first quarter of 2003.

His presidential campaign amassed nearly $6 million during the same period, including $3.35 million from individuals. Candidates are required to report donations from individuals of $250 or more.

Gephardt’s campaign pooh-poohed the poor fundraising results in Iowa and said the $1,000 total does not adequately reflect the candidate’s support in the state, which he won in his first presidential outing, in 1988.

With its first-in-the-nation caucus, tentatively scheduled for Jan. 19, Iowa is a pivotal state for the Gephardt 2004 campaign. It was the only state he carried in his abortive 1988 presidential campaign, and his status as the only Midwesterner among Democratic frontrunners is presumably an asset. Additionally, Democratic politics in Iowa is dominated by organized labor, a constituency Gephardt has staunchly supported.

“If you are trying to equate [Gephardt’s] fundraising in Iowa with his political strength in Iowa, then you don’t understand how the caucus system works,” said Gephardt spokesman Erik Smith. “It’s apples and oranges,” he said.

Although the race for the presidency is still in its early stage, first-quarter filings are significant for campaigns because they demonstrate the viability of a candidate. Financial support from such early-decision states as Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina is especially important.

“If they were looking to show strength or money [in Iowa], they missed it,” said Jennifer Palmieri, a spokeswoman for the presidential campaign of Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.).

“Our goal is not to raise money in Iowa,” Smith countered. “Our goal is to put together an effective, grassroots organization.”

Gephardt made four trips to Iowa in the first quarter of this year to attend at least a dozen events.

Despite the low fundraising total — Iowa is not traditionally a big-money state for political campaigns — campaign aides and consultants to other Democratic hopefuls said Gephardt’s support in Iowa is stronger than his contributions suggest.

Still, even by Iowa standards Gephardt’s fundraising totals are anemic. Among other Democratic frontrunners, Edwards raised $4,000 in Iowa and Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) raised $11,000. Former Gov. Howard Dean (Vt,) reported raising $7,750. Even Rep. Dennis Kucinich (Ohio) took in $1,711 from Iowa supporters.

By comparison, Edwards reported raising $157,800 from individuals in South Carolina, his own make-or-break state. Colloquially known as the “Gateway to the South,” the state’s primary is the third in the nation, along with several others, on Feb. 3.

Kerry netted $34,600 from supporters in New Hampshire. The Granite State is the second presidential primary, scheduled for Jan. 27, and is considered his must-win contest.

Across the three most important primary states, Gephardt trailed Edwards, Kerry and Dean in the early phases of the money race. The Missourian reported raising just $1,500 in New Hampshire and $2,000 in South Carolina.

But Iowa isn’t the only area in which key, early support for Gephardt appears to be soft. Despite receiving the early endorsement of the International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers, Gephardt has not convinced other leaders of organized labor about his ability to win.

“He’s still very well-liked and well-supported, but I don’t think he’s perceived as strong enough,” Robert Bruno, labor professor at the University of Illinois, told The Associated Press earlier this month, echoing similar comments from labor groups such as the AFL-CIO, the Service Employees International Union and the Association of Federal, State, County and Municipal Employees.

In February, the Iowa United Auto Workers announced that it will remain neutral in the Democratic primary. The potent state union went against its national parent in 1988 to endorse Gephardt and was indispensable to his victory in the state.

“Nothing’s going to be handed to Mr. Gephardt,” said Smith of support from organized labor. “He’s going to have to earn it,” he asserted.
hillnews.com