Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Win Smith who wrote (96731)	4/29/2003 7:15:46 PM
From: frankw1900	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I'm sure you're always right, No. I'm wrong about lots of things, but not about islamic and secular fascism as they exist today. Why you have difficulty in either seeing their existence and object to me writing about them, puzzles me. Because you never actually attack my arguments. It always seems in the end to boil down to some sort of mistaken objection to my style, ("Your pompous* lectures") which, according to you, seems to break some sort of Miss Manners type of rule for internet speech. It is offensive that your personal attacks replace criticism of my arguments. The only time I ever learn something from your activities is when you paste an article written, not by you, but someone else. Like I said, my suspicion is you haven't been right about anything since 1972. It's time you got over this. Step out. Take a risk. Your mind is probably better than mine, but how the hell should I know? You never actually say anything. *Main Entry: pomp·ous <http://www.m-w.com/images/audio.gif> Pronunciation: 'päm-p&s Function: adjective Date: 15th century 1 : excessively elevated or ornate <pompous rhetoric> 2 : having or exhibiting self-importance : ARROGANT <a pompous politician> 3 : relating to or suggestive of pomp : MAGNIFICENT - pomp·ous·ly adverb - pomp·ous·ness noun (With regard to my own style, definitions 1 and 3 are obviously applicable; Number 2 clearly is not, as I am very modest, though often misunderstood.)