SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: who cares? who wrote (11570)4/28/2003 9:58:05 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Crain's New York Business 4/22-Aaron Elstein, former staff reporter at the Wall Street Journal Online, will join as reporter on April 28. He will cover Wall Street and write many of the paper's stock columns. Elstein replaces Stephen Gandel, who recently left to join Money magazine. E-mail at aelstein@crain.com.



To: who cares? who wrote (11570)5/1/2003 1:12:32 PM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 19428
 
Hot IPO is OZ last night: DPL AU A$ C 1 . 0 9 +.59 N 1.09/1.10 6,000x35 Equity D E S
As of May1 DELAYED Vol 1,387,749 Op .70 N Hi 1.09 N Lo .69 N
D E S C R I P T I O N Page 1 /11
D P L A U DAILY PLANET LTD/THE 12) CN All News/Research
Night Clubs

The Daily Planet Limited is the owner and manager of the Daily Planet property
a licensed Australian brothel in the Melbourne region. The Daily Planet is
licensed to rent out 18 bedrooms along with offering amenities including a
lounge. gaming room, bar and offices.

STOCK DATA Round Lot 1 | 8)DVD DIVIDENDS - None
1)GPO Price AUD 1.09 | Indicated Gross Yld
52Wk High AUD | Dividend Growth
52Wk Low AUD | Ex-Date Type Amt
YTD change AUD |
% Change |
2)TRA 1 Yr Total Return | EARNINGS
3)FA 17) Shares out 5/ 1/2003 7.543M| 9)ERN
Market Cap AUD 8.22M| Est EPS n.a.
| P/E
| EPS Yr change
WEBSITE - www.dailyplanet.com.au
IPO 05/01/03 - SEE PAGE 4 FOR DETAILS.



To: who cares? who wrote (11570)5/8/2003 11:14:03 PM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19428
 
Why the bottom isn't in: "Convertible's Hot Streak Ends As Boomers Get Stodgy, Safe

By JONATHAN WELSH
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Andy Subbiondo has spent a good part of his adult life driving with the top down -- cross-country in his Fiat Spyder, around New York City in his Triumph convertible and through New England in his '86 Mustang. So what's he shopping for this summer? A new hardtop. "I'm keeping a low profile," says the radio ad sales manager from Loudon, N.H.

Bad news for boomers: Now, even your convertible's having a midlife crisis. After gaining ground for more than a decade, the perennial car of the summer is seeing a surprising drop in sales -- and prestige. From Porsche's Boxster to Lexus's SC 430, most convertible sales are down 20% to 40% so far this year, with Ford suspending production of a once-hot model and many makers offering discounts. And while car makers say they're still hoping for a rebound, here's one telling omen: Even James Bond has switched to a hardtop.

The economy, of course, is behind some of this, with some buyers calling drop-tops too self-indulgent for the times. (Difference between BMW's budget hardtop and convertible: $7,000.) But convertibles may be on the front end of a longer slide: Young buyers are increasingly snubbing them, while baby boomers are going for cars that are safer, more conservative -- and just don't mess up their hair. "You're dealing with a very fashion-conscious end of the business," says Jeremy Anwyl, president of Edmunds.com, an online auto-shopping service.

For Steve Rhoades, the issue was safety ... and his wife. The 56-year-old figured a little black Honda would be the perfect way to treat himself when he retired from his engineering job. But that was before his wife kept asking him to put the top up on the highway. Fifteen hundred miles later, he's selling the car. "We wound up taking all the long trips in her Cadillac," he says.

Ford's Thunderbird


For its part, Honda says the car's safe, though not suitable for everyone. And Mr. Rhoades's wife, Mary Ellen, seconds that: "I guess I'm a wuss," she says, adding at least it was better than her husband's old motorcycle.

Of course, this isn't the first time convertibles have fallen from grace. Air conditioning killed open-air driving in the 1940s and '50s. The cars came back again in the 1960s (Alfa Romeos, Ford Mustangs), until the weak economy and fuel crisis of the 1970s put drivers under cover once more. The current boom goes as far back as 1989, with the introduction of the Mazda Miata. All in all, experts say, feel-good cars always suffer when consumers start feeling bad. "Convertible sales are like hemlines," says Art Spinella of CNW Marketing Research in Bandon, Ore. "They go up when the economy is booming and down when it's weak."

007 Switches Over

This time around, though, the soft-top slump may go deeper still. With so many other flashy new designs competing for the same pool of impulse buyers, convertibles hardly corner the market in cool anymore. Agent 007, for one, drove convertible BMWs back in the '90s, but switched to an enclosed Aston Martin in the latest film. Even television cops don't seem to want them: On "CSI Miami," they drive a hardtop Hummer, a far cry from the ubiquitous drop-tops of "Miami Vice."

In fact, perhaps the worst thing for car makers is that these things may be getting the reputation as a fogey car. The "average" convertible buyer turned 50 last year -- two years older than car buyers as a whole, according to Strategic Vision of San Diego. Younger buyers, meanwhile, are snubbing drop-tops for SUVs and even hatchbacks: Drivers 35 years old and younger make up just 20% of convertible buyers, according to J.D. Power, down from 29% in 2000. In all, the shifting tastes have translated into a 12% drop in new convertible registrations through March, says market researcher R.L. Polk, compared with an overall drop in car registrations of just 2.4%.

So how's the industry responding? By building more. By the end of this year, there'll be at least 30 different drop-top models -- the most in decades, and a 10% jump from the 2002 model year alone.

Lexus SC 430


Topless versions are on the way for Nissan's 350Z sports car, Chrysler's PT Cruiser and BMW's Mini Cooper, and Cadillac is coming out with a two-seat roadster (price: $75,000). Chevrolet is even going to market later this year with a retro-styled, convertible truck. "They're here but the boom is over," says Evan Ide, the curator of the Museum of Transportation in Brookline, Mass.

Rare Deals

For their part, makers say the drop will be short-lived, blaming the slump on everything from war to cold winter weather. And all those new models may jump-start the sector: Mercedes, for one, says it's not too concerned about its 33% drop in SLK sales over the first four months of the year, saying its customers are waiting the model's successor, due out next year. And Ford says the selling season is just getting going: "We're going to have to wait a few months," a spokesman says.

For now, the folks who want these cars are finding some good deals, with Volvo convertibles and high-end Jaguars both going for thousands less than sticker price. Remember those hard-to-get, retro-looking Thunderbird convertibles? Turns out manufacturer Ford still has 2002 models hanging around, and so it's making deals and suspending production for a while this month. Even Corvette convertibles are getting a sales pitch usually reserved for dowdier models, with maker General Motors offering 0% financing.

After all, makers say, some people will never give up on driving with the top popped. Kelly Medvin, for one, knows all of the reasons for getting rid of her bright yellow BMW M Roadster -- she had a child last year, and then lost her job as a commercial real-estate broker in January. "I could do without it," says Ms. Medvin, of Clifton, N.J. "But I don't want to."

Reminds me of 1976 when the "last Cadillac covertible" rolled off the line...



To: who cares? who wrote (11570)5/9/2003 9:30:25 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Analyst Questions Firm's Ties With Investor-Relations Firm

By GREGORY ZUCKERMAN
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Someone on Wall Street finally is up in arms about overly bullish stock reports. Get this -- he's an analyst.

Even as regulators come down on Wall Street firms over their rah-rah research practices, some investor-relations firms and stock-promotion companies are raking in fees and accepting shares to churn out enthusiastic reports aimed at small investors.

At least one securities firm is causing a fuss about it, and in the process focusing an unflattering spotlight on one of the hottest young companies in the world of health-care services, Philadelphia-based eResearch Technology Inc.

On Monday, James Kumpel, an analyst at brokerage firm Raymond James & Associates, Inc., lowered his rating on eResearch -- which provides electrocardiogram analysis for clinical trials, among other things -- to "market perform" from "outperform." The chief reason: eResearch last year hired an online investor-relations company, CEOcast Inc., that touts its clients to investors. One example from a CEOcast newsletter late last year: "We think that even a 50% move [of eResearch shares] on Tuesday would not be out of the question." Adding to Mr. Kumpel's concern is that CEOcast has become a major shareholder of eResearch.

"We are uncomfortable with the arrangement with CEOcast as [eResearch] has, at a minimum, tolerated its IR firm's promotional tendencies," Mr. Kumpel said in his report. "CEOcast has engaged in ... promotional activity designed to goose demand." While eResearch has sharply boosted its earnings-per-share estimates for the year, the analyst notes that its shares have enjoyed an even-more breathtaking run -- they doubled from year end through May 5, to $33.49 from $16.75. (In 4 p.m. Nasdaq Stock Market trading Thursday, eResearch was down 22 cents at $33.33.)

People familiar with the situation say at least one eResearch executive contacted a Raymond James official to complain about Mr. Kumpel's negative report. But Wednesday morning, as news of Mr. Kumpel's criticism circulated and eResearch shares began to weaken, the company announced it would no longer employ CEOcast.

Mr. Kumpel so far isn't changing his recommendation, despite a generally bullish view on the company's prospects. Instead, he is concerned about the judgment of eResearch's management to hire CEOcast in the first place.

For its part, eResearch sees it differently. "CEOcast has done an outstanding job in expanding the awareness of the company in the investment community," eResearch President and Chief Executive Joe Esposito said in a news release announcing the end of CEOcast's employment. "Recently, however, certain investors and analysts have expressed concerns about CEOcast's position as a significant stockholder. Since CEOcast was unwilling to sell the shares that it has purchased, we felt that this move was in the best interest of all stockholders."

CEOcast defends its tactics, and points out that it hasn't sold its eResearch shares despite their climb. "We aren't promoters. We never say anything that isn't true. We relay accurate information," said Ken Sgro, president of CEOCast. "We're a New Age investor-relations firm. That's where the confusion is -- we're the next generation."

CEOcast provides original and syndicated broadcast interviews of chief executives read by more than 20,000 portfolio managers, company executives say. Its stock recommendations are included in an online newsletter distributed to 1.6 million investors, according to the executives. These figures couldn't be verified. Most of the firm's clients are among the smallest of the publicly traded companies, though LendingTree Inc. and Evergreen Resources Inc. are larger. CEOcast said it always receives restricted shares in its clients and holds them for at least one year. It also is paid for its services, which include investor relations and mentions in its newsletters.

CEOcast owns about 183,000 of eResearch's 10.9 million shares outstanding, most of which were purchased on the open market; the company also has been compensated by eResearch with 12,000 warrants that were exercised at $13.40 a share. CEOcast made clear in its reports that it is a major shareholder in eResearch. (eResearch Technology isn't related to equity-research firm eResearch.)

Since eResearch began to work more closely with CEOcast in October of last year, the company has exhorted investors to buy the stock and made predictions of boffo earnings, some of which have been borne out. The strategy worked: Shares of eResearch have soared about 200% since October.

Raymond James's Mr. Kumpel says his concern is that CEOcast went beyond "a factual representation of the company's own outlook" to, in effect, promote expectations so high that they "could set up an unforeseen disappointment down the road."

In December of last year, according to Mr. Kumpel's report, CEOcast said: "We strongly encourage investors to purchase the stock as early as possible in the morning." It also wrote: "Normally, we are not prone to hyperbole. However we believe we have identified an extraordinary situation for investors to make money."

Other times, CEOcast compared the ever-rising price/earnings trading multiple of the $300 million market-cap company to other pricey stocks, such as eBay Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Dell Computer Corp., and even a company that produces organic milk.

According to Mr. Kumpel, CEOcast at times seemed to be previewing future eResearch news releases. In its Dec. 2 newsletter, released after the market closed, CEOcast told investors that "the company will issue a major announcement" the next day. The following morning, eResearch announced an initiative to combat short sellers, investors who had placed bearish bets on the stock in the belief it was overvalued. (More than five million of the company's shares remain shorted by investors.) A CEOcast executive said the company had no access to news releases ahead of time.

"We are just suggesting [that investors buy shares], we do not recommend stocks the way broker-dealers do," says CEOcast's Mr. Sgro. He pointed out that CEOcast was cautious earlier this year about two clients after executives at the companies ran into trouble with the law or with regulators. "We work hard not to be a pump-and-dump firm and don't act that way," he said.

Mr. Kumpel says he only recently became aware of eResearch's association with CEOcast. His downgrade on Monday of the shares is actually his second in the past month; he cited the company's high stock price in the earlier move. He says eResearch has made the right decision cutting ties with CEOcast. "I'm not accusing eResearch of anything other than tolerating this unseemly IR tactic."

--Jenny Park contributed to this article.

Write to Gregory Zuckerman at gregory.zuckerman@wsj.com

Updated May 9, 2003 12:03 a.m.