Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bald Eagle who wrote (400277)	4/29/2003 1:16:42 AM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

"BUSH VOMITS ON CIVILIZATION" --BF'S MOST EXCELLENT NEW THREAD \| TOMMY FRANKS SUED FOR WAR CRIMES BE, Re: No point in having a discussion with someone who just fires out wild accusations Here's the new tread for strong and documented accusations of U.S. war crimes: Subject 53822 The title is totally appropriate: "BUSH VOMITS ON CIVILIZATION" * The accusations to which you refer in the Independent article, news.independent.co.uk Mirror: truthout.org can hardly be considered wild. They are well documented, factual and thorough. Bush and Blair are war criminals. They sold the Iraq war on false pretenses. Violating international law, U.S. constitutional law and common law on the way to an act of naked aggression. Furthermore, it can hardly be called a "wild accusation" that Tommy Franks is guilty of war crimes. This is a very well considered and legitimate prosecution: icnorthernireland.icnetwork.co.uk news.bbc.co.uk reuters.com True to form, the Bush/State controlled U.S. corporate media has failed to adequately inform the American public about this pending litigation. Leaving it to the Moonies: washtimes.com Searches for "Tommy Franks" and "Belgium" provided no meaningful news links at the New York Times, L.A. Times. ******** Recent visitors to the U.S. from Russia, who were formerly employed by the state organs Tass and Pravda marvelled about the American media. One commented: 'Even at the height of our suppression of the news, we were never able to censor the news to the extent that it is done in the U.S. today.'