SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neeka who wrote (400977)4/30/2003 11:25:55 AM
From: CYBERKEN  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
The terrorist bombing in Tel Aviv last night destroyed any pressure Bush would have had to force an Israeli surrender to the murderous subhumans of Palestine. The Palestinians have, once again, booted any opportunity to be re-admitted to the Human Race, even with their new cosmetic "re-organization". That should continue to make them popular with our domestic enemy, which is passionately anti-humanity-and increasingly anti-Semitic...



To: Neeka who wrote (400977)5/1/2003 1:00:22 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Re: "The US is ahead of the curve in regards to the notion that just handing out money year after year hasn't done much of anything but line a few pockets."

>>> IMO, one of the best things the Bush admin. has done is articulate the argument (mostly talked about by the former Treasury Director last fall) that most foreign aid spending over recent decades has been ineffective in achieving national goals, has been wasted, mis-spent, and diverted to Dictator's bank accounts.

>>> The available evidence for this appears to be 'spot on'.

>>> On the other hand - just so we understand reality - it also is true that the the US's aid giving ranks near the bottom of of the amounts given by other donor nations... measured against the size of our economy.

>>> Traditionally (not just for the US, but also for most donor programs) foreign aid has served more as a 'trade promotion device', than as strictly charitable aid.

>>> (For example: donations of American wheat serve to reduce costly stockpiles of subsidized wheat... so that serves to support American farmers by helping to increase the domestic price for their commodity.)