Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (6069)	4/30/2003 5:45:00 PM
From: Lane3	Respond to of 7720

The gender role of male being unnecessary as an involved father or in maintaining a heathy home life as a family member... Gosh, that's not what I'm talking about. I was merely talking about fathers being engaged with their children and partners with their wives rather than aloof breadwinners and lords of the castle where women had better have dinner on the table when they get home from work and children should be seen and not heard. If you think I'm advocating the elimination of men, no wonder you're arguing with me. I like men, for heaven's sake, and want them to be involved in a healthy family life. I simply don't think the man-of-the-house model was healthy. My comment about testosterone, BTW, was just a flip label for hawkish behavior, not an indictment of men. I must have touched a trip wire with my comment. I have zero problems with testosterone, the substance. I've been rather glad of it on many occasions. <g>