SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JohnM who wrote (93)4/30/2003 9:26:25 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793969
 
if the Dems could patch it with the winking and nodding to southern racists to successfully depict this embodiment of the Reps as bigots. De Lay. Ralph Reed, and their ilk would be front and center as the picture of the party.


John. You have made your point. I don't think it is salable. But don't pound it into the ground. OK?



To: JohnM who wrote (93)5/1/2003 7:05:43 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793969
 
LOS ANGELES TIMES
"Let's be frank, we're dealing with a core population of street culture who don't want to be in shelters and who have no right to literally occupy public streets when there are alternatives available," Bratton told an overflow crowd hosted by the Los Angeles Coalition to End Hunger and Homelessness.

God, Bratton has got Guts! This issue is much tougher than the squeegee people were in NYC. One hell of a lot more of them, and they are militant. But Downtown LA is a disaster area.

Bratton Vows Continued Action on Homeless Camps
By Carla Rivera
Times Staff Writer

May 1, 2003

The Los Angeles Police Department will continue to crack down on illegal street behavior in downtown's skid row and will not allow the area, or any other part of the city, to become a permanent homeless encampment, Chief William J. Bratton said Wednesday during a meeting with homeless service providers.

"Let's be frank, we're dealing with a core population of street culture who don't want to be in shelters and who have no right to literally occupy public streets when there are alternatives available," Bratton told an overflow crowd hosted by the Los Angeles Coalition to End Hunger and Homelessness.

Bratton's references to so-called service-resistant homeless people and his aggressive enforcement policies have angered many homeless people and their advocates, who insist that the vast majority of the homeless are law-abiding and stay on the streets because there are no shelter beds available.

The American Civil Liberties Union and the National Lawyers Guild sued the city and police to curb sweeps of parole and probation violators on skid row.

A U.S. district judge issued a preliminary injunction last month against such sweeps. And civil rights organizations have also sued to block the city's ordinance against sleeping on sidewalks.

Bratton said he agreed that there are too few shelter beds but insisted that "as chief, I'm not the solution."

"I'm part of the intervention component and my overriding responsibility is to focus on the behavior of people, not their living conditions."

Homeless providers, however, argued that behavior and living conditions are intertwined. The meeting came on the day that police cleared out a homeless encampment at the 4th Street Bridge, an area near the Los Angeles River that is an emerging arts district.

Bratton said the action was based on complaints about drug dealing, graffiti and gangs and should not be characterized as a sweep. Saying their action was different from the parole sweeps targeted in the injunction, officers gave a three-week warning and provided information about shelters and services.

No arrests were made but about 25 people were told they were trespassing and would have to go elsewhere.

But Becky Dennison, head of the Downtown Women's Action Center, who said she was at the bridge Wednesday morning, noted that officers referred people to the city's cold and wet weather program, which is only open in the evenings.

Bratton was applauded when he said he opposed the three-strikes law and said too many people are incarcerated for minor drug offenses.

And Bratton said he would commit the department to improving officers' training to understand the needs of homeless and mentally ill people.
latimes.com



To: JohnM who wrote (93)5/1/2003 9:54:50 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793969
 
Whither Gary? Here is one candidate that has been off the radar. CBS.com

The 2nd (Or 3rd) Coming Of Gary Hart
WASHINGTON, May 1, 2003

The Gary Hart Story looks a little different now that we're in the post-Clinton era. Will Hart decide to try to be the Comeback Kid II? In his latest Against the Grain commentary, CBSNews.com's Dick Meyer says it might be fun to watch.

On Saturday May 3, 2003 the Democratic presidential candidates will have their first debate, an absurd eight months before the first primary of 2004.

God help us.

American campaigns, by far the longest in the world, are getting longer, for no good reason. Candidates must now be marathoners, which in my mind, means they're masochists.

The ultimate lonely long-distance runner in the Democratic field is Gary Warren Hart. He's been running since 1983.

Age breeds some wisdom and Hart plans to skip the South Carolina charade.

Technically, Hart is just flirting with running. He says he'll decide soon whether to get in, but added, "I am not about to wait another 20 years."

Hart brought his maybe-campaign by CBS News this week. These little candidate get-togethers usually focus on the mechanics of running for president, name recognition numbers, approval ratings, fundraising progress, consultants under contract, target states, and handicapping the rest of the field.

Hart didn't talk tactics. In the realm of tactics and mechanics, Hart doesn't have a prayer. He talked about the gargantuan wads of cash spent in presidential campaigns with genuine bewilderment and disdain, not with the false sanctimony of someone who is going to go out and raise the money anyway.

A Hart campaign would be the longest of long shots and the political press corps has not taken his flirtation very seriously. He's been out of politics for 15 years. He was never a natural on the stump. And, of course, there's the fact that his 1988 campaign came to an abrupt and embarrassing end because of a sex scandal and a boat called "Monkey Business."

"He's got an expiration date on him that says 1988," a Colorado pollster told Hart?s hometown paper.

Indeed, I glibly dismissed Hart in a column I wrote in February. I shouldn?t have.

In 1984, Gary Hart was the candidate of ?new ideas.? His opponent, Walter Mondale, a believer in old ideas, responded by swiping a then-famous Burger King ad ? ?Where?s the beef??

These days Hart?s thinking is very meaty and refreshingly contrarian, especially in a Democratic Party that is so intellectually and strategically timid.

Hart?s two ?big issues? are more Republican than Democrat.

Number one, Hart thinks America isn?t safe enough. He says the state of homeland security is a ?scandal.? This is the issue that put Hart back on the sound-byte plane. During the Clinton administration, Hart and former Senator Warren Rudman, R-N.H., co-authored a report that dramatically documented America?s vulnerability to terrorism and called for a cabinet agency devoted to just that. Nobody paid much attention, until September 11, 2001.

Number two, Hart believes the American economy is living beyond its means, piling up so much foreign debt, consumer debt and national debt that that the capital investment needed to keep the economy growing in the long-term isn?t possible. He wants to shift to a tax system that taxes consumption, not income. Democrats normally don?t like this approach because poor people need to consume a much higher slice of their incomes than rich people.

These sound like Republican planks, but Hart thinks President Bush is oblivious to them.

Hart was a critic of war and he remains unapologetic. He thinks Donald Rumsfeld's Department of Defense has committed the U.S. to a unilateralist, go-it-alone foreign policy that is wholly inappropriate for a world increasingly populated by well-armed countries and ethnic-cultural populations (Muslim fundamentalists, for example). And he thinks the Democrats were caught flat-footed and have been rolled by Rummy.

Similarly, Hart believes the Bush administration has a big, ambitious domestic agenda that the Democrats are equally clueless about. Bush?s policies, Hart argues, aim to ?dismantle everything from the New Deal to the Great Society.? Privatizing Social Security is part of it, but the main scheme is to rack up so much debt and deficit that social spending is impossible for years to come.

All of this takes Hart neatly back to his last political moment in the sun ? 1984.

In Ronald Reagan?s first term, a scaredy-cat Democratic Party rolled over as Reagan cut taxes, poured money into the military and created deficits that his budget director said were a ?Trojan Horse? for radical reductions to domestic programs. Sound familiar? Ronald Reagan was immensely popular in his first term and the Democrats were having an identity crisis. Sound familiar?

Hart says of President Bush, ?He shares with President Reagan a simple, if not simplistic, view of the world that serves him well.?

So why is Hart again itching to take on a popular incumbent with a simple, easily communicated platform and a well-oiled political machine? It makes him seem even more a Don Quixote.

Hart was the campaign manager for George McGovern?s quixotic 1972 campaign. The epilogue to his memoir of that campaign, ?Right from the Start,? said, ?The Democratic Party, under penalty of irrelevance and extinction, must bring forward a new generation of thinkers who are in touch with the real world ? ?

That hasn?t happened. Hart says he doesn?t know why.

Bill Clinton did not bring forth this new generation of Democratic ideas. ?He left no legacy,? Hart said. ?I?ve known him for 30 years. He?s a tactician.?

On the contrary, Hart says that big, creative thinking about American politics for the past 20 years has been dominated by the healthy competition on the Right between neo-conservatives, Christian conservatives and Gingrichians.

Hart?s 1984 run came at a moment that had similar promise for Democrats. A radical Left still sparred with the labor union-New Deal Democratic mainstream, while Hart and his fellow neo-liberals tried to forge a radical center by focusing on such un-Democratic themes as military reform, technology and economic growth. That was the last intellectual high point for the party.

So I?m hoping that Gary Hart might stick around for the real debates in ? next January.

Dick Meyer, the Editorial Director of CBSNews.com, is based in Washington. For many years, he was a political and investigative producer for The CBS News Evening News With Dan Rather. cbsnews.com