Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: elpolvo who wrote (18463)	4/30/2003 11:03:40 PM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 89467

Entrepreneur's antidote for negativity --------------------------------------------- People are often unreasonable, illogical and self-centered. Forgive them anyway. If you are kind, people may accuse you of selfish, ulterior motives. Be kind anyway. If you are successful, you will win some false friends and some true enemies. Succeed anyway. If you are honest and frank, people may cheat you. Be honest and frank anyway. What you spend years building, someone may destroy overnight. Build anyway. If you find serenity and happiness, they may be jealous. Be happy anyway. The good you do today, people will often forget tomorrow. Do good anyway. Give the world the best you have, and it may never be enough. Give the world the best you've got anyway. You see, in the final analysis, it is all between you and God. It was never between you and them anyway. —Mother Theresa of Calcutta

To: elpolvo who wrote (18463)	5/1/2003 12:22:17 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

Pretty lame polvie........... RE: #1 - You didn't provide 4 or 5 examples where I've relentlessly posted lies & distortions. You didn't even provide one legitimate example. In any event, is my opinion in paragraph 8, a relentlessly posted lie or a relentlessly posted distortion? BTW, I thought opinions are just that, opinions. Are paragraphs 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, & 15 relentlessly posted lies or relentlessly posted distortions? Would you like examples that establishes the accuracy of those statements? RE: #2 - You didn't provide 4 or 5 examples where I've posted spurious allegations. You had ZERO examples. You say paragraphs 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, & 15 are also repeatedly posted spurious allegations. What about them are falsified or erroneously attributed? Again, I can provide examples to support they are accurate. RE: #3 - You didn't provide 4 or 5 examples where I've posted a relentless list of conspiracies. ZERO, nada, zilch. You say paragraphs 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, & 15 are also relentless list of conspiracies. How so? These observations have been exposed for precisely what I have called them right here on these threads frequently. Again, I can provide examples to support they are all accurate observations. RE: #4 - You didn't provide 4 or 5 examples where others have repeatedly exposed my posts exposed as lies, etc.? Not one example at all. Where are any irrefutable facts other than your say so? What do you have other than your say so & ZERO facts to support it with? RE: #5 - You didn't provide 4 or 5 examples where others have exposed my posts as hypocritical. You provided nothing. What is hypocritical about the truth, my opinion & observations backed up with irrefutable facts? Again because you claim something is a lie, distortion, etc., doesn't make it so. What factual information exists that makes your allegations true & accurate? I can provide factual data to prove that paragraph's 10 - 15 are accurate observations, which makes your whole comical farce baseless. What factual data can you provide? RE: #6 - You didn't provide 4 or 5 examples where I have used vicious personal attacks, name calling & horrific labeling. How are accurate descriptions considered vicious personal attacks, name calling & horrific labeling? Is not a liar a liar? Are spurious allegations not spurious? How else does one describe outrageous predictions? How else does one describe conspiracy theories? RE: #7 - You have ZERO examples proving absolutely nothing. It was a clever attempt polvie, but it was devoid of factual evidence across the board. I'm sure all the faithful will pat you on the back & no doubt you will feel so good that you got me. What you didn't accomplish though, was to alter the truth or change reality one bit. In essence you've defended some very sick, ethically reprehensible, morally bankrupt & underhanded activities that are pervasive here. Political agendas & defending peers is more important than truth, facts or reality. That's the sad part. Genuinely sad.

To: elpolvo who wrote (18463)	5/1/2003 7:24:11 AM
From: Clappy	Respond to of 89467

There is such humor in this reply: Message 18901252 It would make a good skit. I can almost picture it being said on stage as the audience laughs as he clearly misses the point and continues droning on extending so much effort in a nonsensical argument. I tried reading it with a John Cleese voice saying the words but it didn't quite fit. Then tried it with an Archie Bunker type voice. Still no good. Got any ideas as to who could play the part of the Oofster? -Producer Of The Sillycon Investor Show