Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Raptor's Den II -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: velociraptor_ who wrote (868)	5/2/2003 5:58:48 PM
From: Rich1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3432

Well I can only go by what you have posted on these threads and on others like this one and you have never said it was long term.. maybe you tell your subscribers one thing and these threads another. since I dont sub I dont know.. <Not sure why you keep harping on those statements> As far as that comment perhaps you have me confused with someone else. As far as me bringing up what I did you were pretty emphatic at least on these threads..

To: velociraptor_ who wrote (868)	5/2/2003 7:06:13 PM
From: Kirk ©	Respond to of 3432

[deleted] your site is now up it seems. Thanks for the free lurker commentary. What happens Monday if Nasdaq goes over 1520? Zeev Hed has said recent levels now have him neutral. Kirk

To: velociraptor_ who wrote (868)	5/5/2003 1:51:05 PM
From: Mike da bear	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3432

Velo, In the last 2 weeks the QQQ has going from 26.82 to 28.28, up 5.44%. I've been a subscriber for 1 month now and to tell you the truth I don't see where 2 weeks ago you predicted the QQQ would go up 5% over the next 2 weeks. What I see you you holding QQQ shorts from 22.5, 23.5, etc. Your comments over that time led me to believe you thought the short side was the main play. You keep recommending short at 27+ then 28+ now we're gunning for 29. If you thought we were going up 5% why didn't you close the shorts to reenter at a higher price? If I'm mis-interpreting your comments on your site, then you've got to do a better job of making it clear you're projections. If I'm wrong in these comments please set me straight. mdb