Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: elmatador who wrote (32982)	5/4/2003 12:06:45 PM
From: pezz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

<< can defend my argumentation - ..... I don't attack the US policies for the sake of it. >> With all due respect I think you have a big problem with objectivity when it comes to judging your attitudes towards the US and your ability to defend your arguments. During the Iraq invasion you made some arguments that seemed completely out touch with reality at the time and events proved that to be the case. I would say that it must have appeared even to the most casual of observers that you were using unrealistic arguments to support your contention that this invasion wuz gonna be a failure , criteria being number of casualties and time involved. Calling America a "police state" is also one hellofa stretch. Supporting it with personal antidotes from what I contend is a biased point of view is about as relevant as criticism coming from a Black panther. These incidents did not convince you of anything. You only chose to interpret them in such a way to support your long held convictions. BTW you need not apologize for spelling to me. T'wer it not for SI spell ck and my handy "spelling ace" everybody would be to busy laughing at my posts to ever respond to any of'em.