SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : NOTES -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Didi who wrote (2392)5/4/2003 10:29:18 AM
From: Didi  Respond to of 2505
 
more BRK... "Stock Investors Should Expect 7% Return, Buffett Says"

quote.bloomberg.com

Forbes:
...http://www.forbes.com/home/2003/05/03/cz_rl_0503omaha.html
...http://www.forbes.com/home/2003/05/02/cz_rl_0502buffett.html

===================

>>> Stock Investors Should Expect 7% Return, Buffett Says (Update1)
By Terence Flanagan

Last Updated: May 3, 2003 15:14 EDT

Omaha, Nebraska, May 3 (Bloomberg) -- Investors in U.S. stocks should expect a return of about 6 percent to 7 percent a year, and people who are looking for double those gains are ``dreaming,'' billionaire investor Warren Buffett said.

The economy, as measured by gross domestic product, can be expected to grow at an annual rate of about 3 percent over the long term, and inflation of 2 percent would push nominal GDP growth to 5 percent, Buffett said. Stocks will probably rise at about that rate and dividend payments will boost total returns to 6 percent to 7 percent, he said.

``That math isn't bad, but it is bad for people who expected long-term returns based on looking in the rear-view mirror,'' Buffett said at Berkshire Hathaway Inc.'s annual shareholder meeting in Omaha, Nebraska.

The Standard & Poor's 500 Index, a benchmark for U.S. stocks, surged 18 percent a year on average from 1982 to 1999. The bull market tainted investor expectations, Buffett said. Polls in the late 1990s showed some investors expected stocks to gain 14 percent to 15 percent a year, he said.

``Thinking that in a low-inflation environment is dreaming,'' he said.

Buffett also said this year's rally in junk-rated corporate bonds has dimmed their appeal and that investors shouldn't buy these debt securities now just because he did last year.

``This year, money has poured into junk bonds and prices have changed dramatically,'' he said. ``No one should think that they should buy junk this year because we bought them last year.''

Junk Bonds

Berkshire increased its holdings of high-yield, high-risk debt by six-fold last year to $8.3 billion, buying securities in industries the company has previously shunned such as telecommunications. Junk bonds ``were quite attractive, particularly sometime in the fall,'' said Buffett.

Junk bonds, rated below BBB- at Standard & Poor's or below Baa3 at Moody's Investors Service, have surged 14 percent this year on average including price gains and interest payments, according to Merrill Lynch & Co. data.

The risk premium, or extra yield offered above benchmark U.S. Treasuries, has shrunk to about 7.6 percentage points from 11 percentage points in October.

Buffett told reporters that he plans to name new independent directors to the Berkshire board to comply with corporate governance rules.

Board Changes

``We will add outside directors and it will be done before the deadline,'' he said. ``It's just a matter of finding ones that meet our requirements. There aren't that many out there, but we'll find them.''

Berkshire's seven-member board includes Buffett's wife, son and three executives who have business ties to the company. Lawyers and corporate governance experts have said that Buffett will likely have to add at least two outside directors to the company's board to comply with new rules proposed by the New York Stock Exchange.

The Berkshire board members are Buffett; his son, Howard, 48; Buffett's wife, Susan, 70; Vice Chairman Charles Munger, 79, the CEO of Berkshire-owned Wesco Financial Corp; Ronald Olson, 61, a senior partner at law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP; Malcolm Chace, 68, chairman of Bancorp Rhode Island Inc.; and Walter Scott Jr., 71, who owns a controlling stake in Berkshire's MidAmerican Energy Holdings Co. investment.

The California Public Employees' Retirement System, the largest U.S. pension fund and the owner of 6,000 Berkshire A shares, will vote against the election of Buffett's wife, son, Olson and Scott because of ``conflicts of interest,'' said spokesman Brad Pacheco. These directors have family or business relationships that could impair their objectivity, Calpers said.

$30 Billion Fortune

Buffett met with shareholders at the Omaha Civic Center, where Buffett fans and investors gathered to hear his opinions on corporate governance, investing and the stock market.

Buffett, 72, has amassed a fortune of more than $30 billion, making him the world's second richest man, buying stakes in companies such as Coca-Cola Co. and American Express Co. Over 40 years, he has built Berkshire into an insurance and investment conglomerate whose holdings include General Re Corp., Benjamin Moore Paints and Dairy Queen.

Berkshire earned a record $1.7 billion from operations in the first quarter after its General Re reversed four years of losses and turned a profit. Berkshire also had about $1.7 billion in gains on its securities investments, Buffett said. <<<



To: Didi who wrote (2392)5/13/2003 9:59:19 AM
From: Didi  Respond to of 2505
 
BW...

businessweek.com

berkshirehathaway.com

reuters.com
reuters.com

================

>>>MAY 13, 2003

COMMENTARY

By Pallavi Gogoi


Some Sage Wisdom for Warren Buffett

Who will fill the Oracle's shoes? Investors might sleep easier if their idol followed his own advice about openness.

Another spring, another shareholder lovefest with the Oracle of Omaha, Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren E. Buffett. Yet there was no joy in Nebraska on May 4, when Buffett declined to throw out the traditional first pitch at the Omaha Royals baseball game. Joked the 72-year-old Buffett in his annual letter to shareholders: "After my fastball was clocked at five miles per hour last year, I decided to hang up my spikes."

Buffett fans can soothe their fevered brows. At the Woodstock of Capitalism -- as his throng-drawing meeting is called -- he showed plenty of stamina. After bantering with shareholders for six hours, he signed autographs for many of the 15,000 who showed up. All the while, he downed with abandon his trademark Cherry Cokes and See's Candies. His hand was firm, his grip was sure.

TOP SECRET.
As any investor in Berkshire Hathaway (BRK ) will tell you, Buffett's health is an all-important matter. When he steps down -- which he insists will happen only when physical or mental incapacity forces him to do so -- the huge Buffett premium might fade quickly. With Berkshire's A shares trading at an unequaled $73,790 apiece -- 29 times trailing earnings -- the stock could face a steep slide.

To his credit, Buffett is paying some attention to the issue. On May 5, he presented his directors with a list of candidates he would like to see take his place. He does the same sort of presentation every few years. Troublingly, Buffett won't say who is on the list -- and neither will the coterie of insiders on his board.

Therein lies an interesting problem in the post-Enron era. This dogged advocate of good corporate oversight would never tolerate such secretiveness in the boards of other companies. Some of his shareholders also would like to see more candor. "If Buffett needs to reassess these people every two years, is it unreasonable to expect that shareholders would also require to assess them, rather than wait till the last minute?" asks Larry D. Coats, portfolio manager at Oak Value Fund (OAKVX ), where Berkshire stock accounts for 10% of the mutual fund. Good question.

THE ONE AND ONLY.
Buffett, who declines to talk about his reasons for not sharing with shareholders his thoughts on succession, has offered tantalizing hints in the past about how the company might run without him. Odds are that his job would be split among three people, with one honcho handling investments, another dealing with day-to-day operations, and a chairman upholding the shareholder-oriented culture. That seems to be a tacit acknowledgement that no single individual could handle the job as well as the Sage himself.

Certainly, it would be difficult for another person to weave the sort of magic that he does, given that Buffett has guided Berkshire to a 22% average annual earnings gain since 1965. "It would be inappropriate to try and seek another Warren Buffett -- there isn't going to be one," says David S. Ruder, a former Securities & Exchange Commission chairman, now professor of law at Northwestern University.

As Buffett and his board have refused to shed any light on potential successors, outsiders have filled in the blanks. In this parlor game, Buffett's son, Howard, is the odds-on favorite to take over the chairman's slot. And division chiefs Tony Nicely or Lou Simpson of Geico and Rich Santulli of NetJets are thought to be next in line.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST?
Yet, Buffett's vagueness about succession -- so 20th century in these good-governance days -- raises another disconcerting issue. This shareholder champion's own board falls regrettably short of new rules regarding independent directors. Of seven Berkshire directors, only one, Rhode Island banker Malcolm G. Chace, qualifies as independent.

That's why Buffett has drawn heat from the California Public Employees' Retirement System, the largest U.S. pension fund and the owner of 6,000 Berkshire A shares. The fund voted this year against the reelection of four directors: Susan and Howard Buffett, Buffett's wife and son; Ronald L. Olson, a senior partner at a law firm that pockets fees from Berkshire; and Walter Scott Jr., who owns a controlling stake in Berkshire's MidAmerican Energy Holdings Co. "These directors have family or business relationships that CalPERS believes could impair their objectivity," says the pension fund.

Such criticisms are unsettling because they're levied against a tireless advocate of good governance and outrageous CEO compensation. Coca-Cola (KO ) and Washington Post Co. (WPO ), companies where Buffett is a director, have likely felt his sting: They were among the first, for instance, to announce they would expense stock options, a hobbyhorse of his. At Berkshire, he has gone 22 years without a raise and pays himself only $100,000 a year, an amount he finds difficult to spend with his spartan lifestyle. CEOs across America would be wise to emulate that.

BROADER AGENDA.
Eventually, Buffett will overhaul his board -- and he says he'll comply with the independence rules in time to meet new, post-Enron mandates. Several people have already nominated themselves, he chuckles. Imagine what a job that would be? Who wants to second-guess a guru whose decisions -- often made in minutes -- fly from calculations done in his head or based on his gut feelings about management? In fact, such directors might really just serve to protect shareholders from a fire sale once Buffett decides to give up the top job.

For now, investors will just have to keep a close eye on their guru. Over time, plenty more will flock to the annual spring pilgrimage with more on their minds than just nibbling on cheese at a Berkshire-owned jeweler, Borsheim's, or savoring discounts at the company's Nebraska Furniture Mart. Says a shareholder who journeyed all the way from Europe: "I come every year to make sure Mr. Buffett is in good condition."

Some folks who stood in line to get Buffett's autograph on $100 bills or copies of his books likely paid greater attention to his gaze and grip than in the past. More independent directors -- and a bit more candor -- might give them less to worry about. <<<