SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Shack who wrote (72834)5/5/2003 4:30:40 PM
From: Paul Shread  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
Looks just about perfect. I shorted QQQ at the close, but I'm starting to wish I'd shorted SPY.



To: Shack who wrote (72834)5/5/2003 4:48:35 PM
From: byhiselo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
not sure the bears have any juice left for a wet dream, lol cheers



To: Shack who wrote (72834)5/5/2003 4:49:15 PM
From: nspolar  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 209892
 
Shack, don't know if bears have those things. Maybe, since they do reproduce.

Could be more like a bear coming out of hibernation, and blasting out the crapola plug that has been stuck in its butt for months on end. Bet that is a smelly first dump of the new season.



To: Shack who wrote (72834)5/5/2003 6:44:34 PM
From: marginmike  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
wouldnt that be longer term bullish as a flat wirth a c still to come?after the vi down?



To: Shack who wrote (72834)5/5/2003 8:42:46 PM
From: illyia  Respond to of 209892
 
Well, yes, that is it, isn't it....
Indeed. And, it is a beautiful thing...
Whether it is correct or not, it is beautiful.
i.



To: Shack who wrote (72834)5/5/2003 11:36:00 PM
From: bcrafty  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
A case for higher prices

Nice potential Gartley patterns on COMPX, SPX, and BKX from the phoenix

dailyduediligence.com