SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (156994)5/6/2003 9:52:06 PM
From: Victor Lazlo  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
Rumsfeld expected to cite mobile bio-lab in Iraq
From Jamie McIntyre CNN

WASHINGTON (CNN) --Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is expected to point to what the United States says is a mobile biological weapons laboratory as evidence that Iraq until recently had an active bio-weapons program, Pentagon officials told CNN on Monday.

Pentagon officials said Rumsfeld may cite the truck, discovered recently in northern Iraq, at a scheduled Pentagon briefing Tuesday.

The suspected mobile laboratory is on a truck frame and resembles the drawings shown by Secretary of State Colin Powell at the United Nations in February, sources said. At the time, Powell said the U.S. suspected Iraq had at least seven mobile labs.

On Friday, U.S. officials told CNN Correspondent David Ensor that they believed a truck, seized the previous week by U.S. troops south of the northern Iraqi city of Mosul, may have contained a mobile biological weapons laboratory.

Pentagon officials now say the United States has confirmed the truck did contain equipment for making biological agents, sources said, but no biological material was found.

The equipment in the truck had "recently been thoroughly scrubbed," one official told CNN last week. That official described the vehicle as looking like an old moving van outside with "suspicious-looking" equipment inside.

Find this article at:
cnn.com



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (156994)5/6/2003 10:45:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
lizzie, the problem was those high growth sectors never shoulda grown as fast they did. that's why we have a bust now.

i'm not sure any tax plan can undue the damage done when the bubble was raging and that's why i spoke out against the bubble when everyone was telling me to get on the q-train at $160 a share (qcom).

even so, saying trickle down works better than trickle up when oversupply is rampant is just plain wrong. we do not need more supply, we need more demand. we need buyers of actual things, notmore business that will lose money like the current businesses.