SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sjemmeri who wrote (16993)5/6/2003 11:26:08 PM
From: TimbaBear  Respond to of 78661
 
Steven

Yours sounds like a reasonable strategy.

I was just holding on to an old position that I've decided to get out of. I didn't think the recent down spike would last and was holding on for a recovery back to the mid-14 level when it just kept going.

I've been so busy with personal stuff and business that I haven't had time to re-assess.

Glad to see the move (at long last) but, like you, I'm skeptical about its endurance. For now, though, I'll ride along and see what happens.

Timba



To: sjemmeri who wrote (16993)5/7/2003 7:12:10 AM
From: Wallace Rivers  Respond to of 78661
 
One I've put back on my radar screen (I received a small IPO allocation, since sold, about a year ago) is VNX (Veridian).
Excellent business to be in IMHO, results have exceeded expectations for several quarters now.
Potential negatives are insider selling (can't blame them, that's one means of getting paid), and talk of a secondary (although some speculate this won't happen until prices are higher).
Unfortunately, stock price has jumped considerably lately, because of an excellent quarterly report, as well as a rejuvenated market.



To: sjemmeri who wrote (16993)5/7/2003 9:59:46 AM
From: Grommit  Respond to of 78661
 
Ha! I never notice that it was my old sidekick Wallace. Well, actually, I'm the side kick. But those who know us, are well aware who gets who out of jams, and who designed the rocket to the moon.

I think that whenever decent value investors make opposite bets, it shows that that particular stock is not an "obscene value play".