SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: At_The_Ask who wrote (73162)5/7/2003 7:11:29 PM
From: NOW  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
hmm, i actually thought that was a good post. What peeves you about it?



To: At_The_Ask who wrote (73162)5/7/2003 7:19:04 PM
From: bcrafty  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
I agree with tooearly

"A TRUE head and shoulders pattern needs to have higher volume on the left shoulder and head than the right shoulder - in which this longer term pattern does not even come close in realizing this scenario.

The guy is correct in his comments on H&S volume, no?



To: At_The_Ask who wrote (73162)5/7/2003 10:41:33 PM
From: the-phoenix  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 209892
 
So I guess he would discount the Inverse H&S that has formed over the past year as well. So the market won't go down due to the invalid H&S but it won't go up either because of the invalid inverse H&S <GGG>.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News