SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PCSS who wrote (2860)5/9/2003 9:00:50 AM
From: PCSS  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4345
 
part 3

IBM VIEWED AS A 'FAVORITE' PARTNER. Our panelists generally expressed satisfaction with IBM as an 'easy' partner to do business with. One panelist said that IBM has done a good job recently in making its software offerings more homogeneous and raising the level of quality. Another noted that their business model enables them to work well both with their own offerings and third-party offerings.

DISSATISFACTION WITH ORACLE PRICING; POSITIVE ON RAC. Our panelists expressed dissatisfaction with Oracle's pricing mechanisms, which they view as strong arming tactics to extract revenues. That said, a few raised optimism about the opportunity generated from its Real Application Clustering (RAC) capabilities. In stark contrast, there was no interest in Oracle's Collaboration Suite, with CIOs already captive to Microsoft Exchange. On the Web application server front, one panelist commented that BEA Systems was still slightly ahead in this arena, but not in a 'material' way that would make a difference in deploying web-based applications vs IBM's WebSphere. On the security front, Symantec was named as a company with positive market momentum.

ON-DEMAND COMPUTING MORE BUZZ THAN BITE. Despite recent industry chatter about utility-based computing, our CIOs are not convinced. One panelist would only consider on-demand capabilities within pre-existing outsourcing contracts, and the consensus rejected the idea of outsourcing business- critical services and processes (e.g., the ASP model).

VOICE-OVER-IP IS BEING TESTED BY MOST, BUT NOT COMPELLING ENOUGH YET FOR BROAD DEPLOYMENT. Three out of our four CIOs are already testing Voice-over IP with multi-hundred user sites, generally in order to keep on top of the emerging technology. However, the consensus was that the cost/benefit is not yet compelling enough to spur enterprise-wide use.

OFFSHORE A TOP STRATEGIC INITIATIVE. For all of our CIOs, 50% or more of their IT spend is on internal staffing. Between 30% and 70% of that cost is for maintenance/production costs which can be aggressively moved offshore. The remainder is for development, some of which can be moved offshore. Consistently, CIOs indicated fairly aggressive initiatives to shift the mix of dollars away from maintenance toward development by employing an offshore strategy. More than one of our panelists estimated offshore expenses as 1/3 to 1/4 the cost of internal expenses.

MANY SARBANES-OXLEY-INSPIRED IT PROJECTS MAY PROVE TO BE UNNECESSARY. According to our panelists, the passage of the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act has spawned a boutique industry of tech solutions. While the level of accountability for top-level executives has surely increased, a few panelists suggested that the regulation is too nascent for tech managers to appreciate the corresponding IT needs, which has created a gap that vendors are trying to manipulate.



To: PCSS who wrote (2860)6/3/2003 1:02:25 PM
From: The Duke of URL©  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4345
 
HP plays up confidence

By John G. Spooner
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
June 3, 2003, 7:50 AM PT

Hewlett-Packard is confident it can meet consensus projections for earnings for the rest of the year, because of its ability to cut costs and take business from rivals, CEO Carly Fiorina said Tuesday.

"We’re comfortable with these estimates," Fiorina said at a meeting with financial analysts in New York.



The consensus among analysts is that HP will deliver revenue of $17.5 billion and a profit of 26 cents per share for its current fiscal quarter that ends in July, according to First Call. During its fourth fiscal quarter, analysts expect HP to post revenue of $19.1 billion and a profit of 36 cents per share.

Fiorina's comments reiterate a statement of confidence that HP made last month.

The computer giant, which merged with Compaq Computer a little more than a year ago, says its business is gaining strength because of cost savings that exceeded expectations and large deals, including the sale of a Superdome server to the Chinese government, and a $3 billion, 10-year outsourcing agreement with Procter & Gamble.

In December, HP projected the ability to save $3 billion on costs in the current fiscal year. It has since found that it can save about $3.5 billion in costs, Fiorina said. Meanwhile, HP's Personal Systems Group, which builds PCs, is profitable, while its Enterprise Systems Group, responsible for hardware such as servers, is on track to reach profitability in the second half of the year. HP also signed up 55 new customers for IT services in the first quarter, the company said.

Fiorina said HP's cost cutting and tightening of relationships with customers means the company can meet financial projections, even without an economic turnaround. HP expects to cut another $1 billion from its supply chain, for example, by improving relationships with component suppliers, using contract manufacturers and reducing the number of facilities, such as call centers, that it operates.

"We would love the economy to pick up. We'd love IT spending to pick up. But in the meantime, we're going to focus on what we can control. We're going to focus on growth against our competitors. We will continue to make ongoing improvements in our cost structure and in productivity. As a result of that, you can expect earnings improvements throughout 2003, 2004 and beyond," she said.

The way HP sees it, Fiorina added, its biggest customers are spending less than 20 percent of their IT budgets on HP. HP doesn't need those customers to spend more on IT. Instead, it needs to convince them to spend more of their IT budgets on HP, she said.

Work to do
Though the company is comfortable with earnings estimates for the short term, HP admits that it has work to do in the long term, both in continuing to cut costs and in fending off the advances of Dell Computer and IBM. Dell and IBM are also working toward bigger portions of large companies' IT budgets--making for a battle for share of wallet.

Still, HP admits that it won't be easy to gain market share in any area of the market, whether it's desktops or services.

Dell has an advantage in the U.S. business market, where it sells more desktops than HP, Fiorina acknowledged. But elsewhere in the world and also in notebooks, Fiorina argued that HP is the top dog.

"This is now a two-horse race. You will see us and Dell trade for the top spot (in worldwide market share). We're not managing this business based on who's going to be No. 1 in a quarter. We're focusing on profitable (market share) growth," she said.

While Dell sold more PCs worldwide than HP in the first quarter, HP has sold the most notebooks for the past two quarters, according to IDC.

HP also plans to guard against Dell's low prices with its strategy to win business customers by lowering the cost of owning and managing large numbers of PCs over time.

The cost of buying a PC is about one-eighth the actual price of owning that machine over a period of four years, HP executives said. One way HP can cut down on those costs--and thus giving it a marketing advantage--could be by delivering PC-like products based on HP blade servers.

HP has been working a blade PC product for some time. Blade-based PCs look similar to standard PCs but offload many duties to servers. The blade option can cut management costs by as much as 70 percent and better secure data, said Shane Robinson, HP's chief technology officer.

Meanwhile, HP has also launched a broader new initiative, dubbed Adaptive Enterprise, in an effort to boost the return on investment that companies derive from computer systems. The strategy seeks to automate many aspects of computer networks or data centers, such as adapting to spikes in demand for processing power or allocating extra storage capacity on demand.

The initiative, which is based heavily on HP software and the company's service capabilities, counters competitor initiatives such as IBM's On Demand computing strategy and Sun Microsystems' N1 initiative.