SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JohnM who wrote (752)5/9/2003 1:08:03 PM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 794229
 
How about the line that taxes, if well spent (yeah, I know, big if) make for a better social order which makes life better for all of us.

Yep. "I am from the Government and I am here to help you." I read the piece you posted from the "Nation" about the rise of the right, and how the left had lost, and tried to get a handle on how to respond to it. Never came up with one.

My position is that having the Government install social programs has failed, and your position is that they were not run right. I think that the nature of the Government is such that nobody can run these programs "right". The temptation to do it wrong is just too strong.

But, the ideological discussion on this will not create any light, as we both know. I have believed for a long time that any solution to the failure of Government programs had to include Tort reform to stop the Lawyers from suing the Government so much, Union reform to allow administrators to have more freedom to change, hire, and fire, and "Bratton" style accountability to improve the system and get rid of incompetent administrators.
The Republicans realize that the twin pillars that support the Democrats are the Public Unions and the Lawyers. So they are looking at accomplishing my first two goals as a way to cut into the Democrats base. That kills two birds with one stone.



To: JohnM who wrote (752)5/9/2003 8:32:17 PM
From: Condor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794229
 
Neither of us is terribly knowledgeable here but it shouldn't keep us from beating up on one another in our usual fashion.

LOL...That's the spirit John! <GGG>



To: JohnM who wrote (752)5/11/2003 6:33:10 PM
From: Peter O'Brien  Respond to of 794229
 
Krugman is quick to use the word "scam"
to describe the Bush tax cuts.

Perhaps you should ask yourself why the
Social Security program needs "fixing"
to begin with?

Why isn't the Social Security program itself
being appropriately (in my opinion) described
as a "scam"?