SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Biotech Stock Picking - 2003 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Metcalf who wrote (213)5/10/2003 6:43:25 AM
From: The Dodgy Ticker  Respond to of 383
 
John, does that other 100% consist of "dark matter" in Erik's portfolio?

<bg>

Bob



To: John Metcalf who wrote (213)5/10/2003 7:44:42 AM
From: Mike McFarland  Respond to of 383
 
Of course the gaming part of it is pretty fun
(we wouldn't have many takers for a five year contest).

In 2000 the average gain was something like 50%,
and that was my gain. Yet many of my biotech stocks
turned out to be disasters over the last three years.
Of my ten picks in Jan 2000, four were bought out
(axph, genxy, snap...or reabsorbed like gzmo)
three went to penny heaven (magn, cnsi, tgen).
The other three are still kicking--but I don't
own any of them (aria, kdus, corx).

Fwiw...if I was going to design a multiyear contest
I would let you hold cash and limit trades to just
a few a year. Or perhaps only allow a third of the
portfolio to turn over each year. Something like
that. And you probably would want to limit low
priced stocks to not much of the portfolio, just
as you would in the real world.

Like I said, gaming with zingers is more fun.
And it's not a bad way to get your grubstake together
if you have some luck.