SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: unclewest who wrote (830)5/10/2003 3:06:49 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794065
 
Did not realize you were quite so good with numbers, uw. Since you think Clinton is responsible for the drop in the Nasdaq, then I assume you think he is responsible for the good times in the 90s. You are holding presidents responsible for economic policy. OK. I also gather you consider the fact that Bush is the first president since Herbert Hoover to have job loss during his term, as something he is responsible for.

Check this out under the heading "Top Gun at Job Destruction" and get back to me.

thenation.com



To: unclewest who wrote (830)5/10/2003 8:30:14 PM
From: Condor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794065
 
Unc...NASDAQ???

A bubble is a bubble. That situation was not a reflection of Pres's. Wouldn'rt have mattered who was in. Talking about bubbles, remember gold at $ 800? Who was Pres. then? Who knows and who cares? It doesn't matter because it was a bubble.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News