SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The New Economy and its Winners -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Harmond who wrote (16898)5/11/2003 12:47:01 PM
From: Immi  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 57684
 
reed Is Good
Kenneth L. Fisher, 05.26.03, 12:00 AM ET

The masses worry that in the war's wake the economy will
weaken. So you don't have to. What should you worry
about now? Letting the new bull market get away from you.

If you didn't already know it by instinct, then the
last four years should have taught you: When most investors are greedy you
should be fearful, and when most investors are fearful you should be greedy.
Investors now get the first part of this rule, but not the last part. Fear is
pervasive on Wall Street, so this is a good time to be greedy. Sell your timid
Treasury bills. Buy stocks.

Financial markets are popularity contests. They discount commonly known
information, whether the prospect of $1.10 a share in earnings for Microsoft
this year or the risk that occupied Iraq will turn into a quagmire. Therefore it is
pointless to worry about what others worry about. If you do and base market
judgments on those worries you will be wrong more often than right.

Put it this way: If others worry about something, you just don't have to
because they are doing it for you. You should worry about something
else--namely, whatever they're not worried about.

In 1999 folks fretted over the Y2K bug in computer software. So that was one
risk to the stock market you didn't have to spend any time on. In 2000 they
worried about how to navigate the so-called new economy, hence one more
thing safely ignored. Note, they did not worry about the economy going south.
So you had to.

In late 2001 they began worrying about terrorists. Since then terrorist activity
has declined. We didn't get the follow-on hit in the U.S. we expected. Suicide
bombings in Israel have declined from one a week to one a month. A year ago
the big worry was corporate integrity. Since then a river of scandal (Enron,
Arthur Andersen, Dynegy, WorldCom, Adelphia) has become a trickle of
scandal (HealthSouth). The feared catastrophe that does not materialize
creates an upward push on stocks when fear finally fades and demand for
equities returns.

Of course, this year the masses worried about Iraq. So you didn't have to. Now
they worry that in the war's wake the economy will weaken. So you don't have
to. I'm not saying the economy will be gangbusters, only that it won't fall into
recession.

What should you worry about now? Letting the new bull market get away from
you. Almost no one worries about that. Here is why it's a real risk. First, invert
the market's P/E into an E/P, an earnings yield to compare with interest rates.
In 2000 it was markedly lower than fixed-income returns. Ten-year bonds
yielded almost 7% and stocks' earnings yield was below 3.5%. Now, the bond
yield is below 4% while the earnings yield on 2003 earnings is conservatively
at 6%. Further, in the next decade the bond yield on current holdings can't
grow. The earnings yield will. Stocks aren't expensive.

Second, we've had three years in a row in which the return was below the
market's long-term 10% average. In the S&P 500's history that has happened
only seven times. On the previous six occasions the subsequent five-year
return averaged 17% a year and was never negative; the ten-year performance
averaged 12% a year and was never negative. Big performance numbers. You
can't get them with bonds or cash. Cash yields 1% and change these days.
The ten-year Treasury yields 4%. Whatever uptick you might or might not get
over the next month on the T note, I can assure you that if you buy it now and
hang on for ten years, you will get a 4% annual return.

You can expect far better from stocks over the next decade. Be greedy. Try to
do even better still. You can try with these three options:

Canada's Alcan (nyse: AL - news - people ) (29) is the world's best
aluminum firm. Basic materials producers generally should do well for a while
now, despite the common perception that they are dogs. Alcan isn't just any
growth company; it's a growth company from which the market expects no
growth. So it's cheap--17 times trailing earnings, against 25 times for its lesser
peers.

Look closely. Switch the "a" for an "o" and you get Swiss-based Alcon (nyse:
ACL - news - people ) (43), which owns 25% of the global eye care market.
Its product line ranges from drugs (like Azopt for glaucoma or Ciloxan for
infections) to surgical goods (like AcrySof for cataracts) to consumer brands
(like Tears Naturale). As populations age Alcon products build natural
momentum. The company has been gaining global share for years but has
been available as a stock only since Nestlé spun it off in March 2002.

Investors fear that a spent consumer in a weak economy will doom retailers.
So you don't have to fear that. From this comes opportunity. Try a package of
beaten-down retailers in equal thirds to make one total investment: Dillard's
Department Stores (nyse: DDS - news - people ) (14), Federated
Department Stores (nyse: FD - news - people ) (31) and Toys "R" Us
(nyse: TOY - news - people ) (10). All are cheap, with trailing P/Es below 9
and 50% below the norms for retailers.

Kenneth L. Fisher is a Woodside, Calif.-based money manager. Visit his
homepage at www.forbes.com/fisher