Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (620)	5/12/2003 1:57:31 AM
From: Don Earl	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20039

Ray, I remember seeing the official report or at least the conclusion, and if I remembered to bookmark it and if I can find it in my bookmarks, I'll post it when I have some spare time to look for the reference. I don't recall the exact phrasing, but there was what I view as a high waffling content in the proposed "fuel" theory. To the best of my knowledge, the possibility of a controlled implosion wasn't even mentioned as an alternate explanation for three buildings falling in a manner identical to a controlled implosion. It seems to me if the investigation was legit, and unbiased, the subject would have been covered rather than ignored. <<<3) the rush to remove structural materials to foreign smelters, excepting several samples selected to be maintained for forensic examination.>>> Yep, and that's the bottom line on 9/11, if there's nothing to hide, why the big cover up. All the guess work involved in what's being hidden would have been still born if it weren't for the massive cover up. Nothing adds up and every effort to do the math is hit with increasingly more desperate efforts to keep everything secret. It's pretty scary when George is even more secretive about 9/11, than Bill was about the stains on the blue dress.