Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JBTFD who wrote (627)	5/12/2003 6:12:00 AM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Mark, Considering the impact damage to each WTC tower, one has to wonder why WTC-2 became more vulnerable than WTC-1. The impact on 2 was tangential to the central structural core with (apparently) the preponderance of the Jet A expended in a dramatic but not injurious fireball at 9:03 AM. Timed to make sure all the eyeballs of the world were glued on the event. Unless we believe the official story, and for some reason, the trusses on Tower 2 were more stressed than those on Tower 1 which was impacted more directly to core and with, TTBOMK, with a much greater fuel load ignited within the structure. Smoky as it was, and apparently not structurally significant until shocking collapses occurred. It is anomalous. I would have really loved to have gotten a chance to chat with George Bush on the 14th Green in Sante Fe yesterday and posed the question. What do you suppose he might have said? Hehe. He'd have said it was sure nice the way that the temperature was coming up. Then he would have said it is a state secret. Cf.: Message 18934745 Then he would have asked me to adjust my tinfoil hat. ************* But really Mark, don't you know why the second tower hit collapsed first? It was God's will. Sucker.