SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (157194)5/12/2003 12:31:05 PM
From: Oeconomicus  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
$550 billion is $550 billion regardless of whether one person getting all of it or 250 million getting $2,000 ...

your argument that putting all the money in the hands of a few is somehow better just doesn't make sense.


Your argument that our choice is between a GOP plan that puts all the money in the hands of one or a few and a Dem plan that spreads it out to everyone is not supported by the facts of the plans.

The GOP plan cuts marginal rates across the board to create both long-term and short-term stimulative effects. The Dems want a temporary break to put a small amount of money into the emptiest pockets to stimulate spending now. History shows the latter approach just doesn't work.

For more on this, pick up today's WSJ and open to the opinion page.

Bob



To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (157194)5/12/2003 9:28:31 PM
From: Victor Lazlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
<< your argument that putting all the money in the hands of a few is somehow better just doesn't make sense. >>

When did I ever make that argument?? LOL !

<<you think we need more supply to pack the shelves even higher. >>

And when did I ever make that argument?? LOL again!
You're confusing me with someone else.