SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dale Knipschield who wrote (70290)5/13/2003 5:29:58 AM
From: zonder  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
that this incident happened at night.

And this is taken from the Independent article you object to:

On the night he died, he was filming Israeli soldiers demolishing a Palestinian house.

So I guess now you believe the Independent?

This is the rest of the article:

The Israeli army claimed there had been a heavy exchange of fire with Palestinian militants when Mr Miller was shot, and that its soldiers had come under fire from rocket-propelled grenades. Colonel Avi Levi, the deputy commander of the battalion involved, claimed: "We are speaking of a situation in which soldiers are under fire, under massive shooting from a number of sources, also from the area where the British TV crew was."

But footage filmed by an Associated Press cameraman, Taher Zeyara, shows that there was no firing when Mr Miller left the house he was filming from, with Ms Shah and a Palestinian translator, Abd al-Rahman Abdullah. There is total silence as the three walk towards the Israeli soldiers.

The journalists are clearly visible, holding up a large white flag and shining a torch at it. Fluorescent "TV" markings can also be seen on Ms Shah's bullet-proof vest. Without warning, there is a single loud shot. There is a second single shot, and then Mr Miller is heard yelling in pain. There is no sign of any exchange of fire.


Which makes sense. Even at night, there would have to be light for a camera crew to film what is going on. Especially as they were carring torches and had fluorescent signs on their bodies, they would be the brightest thing around.

Please read that article again. The Independent is not a rag that would fabricate stuff, and they are definitely not militant pro-Palestinian or pro-Muslim. If they say they saw a footage in which there was no shooting and the camera crew were clearly visible, I believe them. If you don't, I would be interested to know the reason for this prejudice towards the Independent.