Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Edscharp who wrote (17309)	5/13/2003 12:54:17 AM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 21614

Slow Ed, Re: You're definitely vying for fool of the year. I want to wish you the best in your endeavors in the markets on Wall Street. Reading your post, and realizing how extraordinarily gullible you are, I'm cringing at what the wire houses must do to guy like you. Unless, of course, what you write is not actually representative of the real "Edscharp", but rather is a cleverly written psyops distraction. I see that you cleverly attempt to involve the lurkers on the thread. This is always a good sign that it isn't me you hope to persuade, but undecided others who might not have taken the time to do the extra-ordinary due diligence I've done on the Bush Crime Family and the "vast Right Wing Conspiracy". Which, BTW, is a fact of life, no matter how often those involved deny it. **** Re: So, according to you the American Military is in charge. Where did George Bush go today to primp in front of the cameras about jobs? Why, it was military aircraft assembly facility in New Mexico. The military-industrial complex is where we can expect all net job growth in the Bush economy until he's sent back to pasture in Crawford. ***** Re: The biggest problem for the military of course would be rigging the elections. Remember, the uniformed military is just one side of the revolving door of the military-industrial complex. You need to consider the rest of the cabal, as well. You do know that the Supreme Court's decision on December 12, 2000 was strictly extra-Constitutional and in the view of many Constitutional scholars and lawyers completely illegal. Add to that the very curious nature of election reforms that have come about since that election fiasco. The makers of electronic voting devices capitalized on the mess to push through Federal legislation that mandate upgrades to newer electronic voting devices nationwide. Add to that the curious U.S. Supreme Court decision that the software to run these devices is to be considered "proprietary" and therefore inaccessible to any public auditing, and you have a recipe for massive voting fraud. Greg Palast has written extensively about the theft of the Presidency in 2000, and the subsequent problems that are being created: gregpalast.com You are being disingenuous when you sniffily dismiss the Florida vote fraud as a matter of "hanging chads". Actually, as Palast brilliantly points out, the real problem is a fraud that was perpetrated on the citizens of Florida by the office of Governor Jeb Bush, then AB Katherine Harris (serving concurrently as the Bush/Cheney 2000 campaign chair, a huge conflict-of-interest) and a Georgia corporation with close ties to the Bushies called ChoicePoint which created some fraudulent vote scrubbing software and voter-rejection lists. ***** Re: "Who stood down on 9/11?". What? You either really are "out to lunch, a little light in loafers, and playing with less than a full deck", or else you are being disingenuous. It is very commonly understood in the SI community that the response of NORAD and the USAF on the morning of 9/11 did not follow standard operating procedures. That the USAF stood down in its response to the hijacked commmercial jet liners. You can't be too clever if you you think you can get away with such coyness. Try this. Enter <Who stood down on 9/11?> into the Google search engine. google.com You will get 182,000 hits. Who's out to lunch here, Ed?