Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Edscharp who wrote (17365)	5/13/2003 10:30:32 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21614

Well, although it is not good for USA, some USonians are working very hard on it. However, it has been the same for many centuries, one of the typical aspects of 2-party systems where some little, tiny-weeny 1% minority can cause great and pregnant changes. Ilmarinen Funny stuff how it was mathematically proven in the 1960 and 70s, one of the greatest funny things since the babylonian, eqyptian, greek and romans had fun.

To: Edscharp who wrote (17365)	5/14/2003 1:49:31 AM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21614

How utterly naive. You said, regarding empire: It's not a good goal for the U.S. and we are not pursuing it. How utterly naive. Of course we are pursuing empire. Name any other nation on the planet that has military forces posted to 125 other nations? Hell, I can't think of another nation that has its soldiers posted to more than a dozen. We are an empire, and an evil one at that. Here's the roadmap to "Rebuilding America's Defenses". Read the text at the bottom of the page carefully. Message 18886070 A few weeks ago, a favored anti-Bush sign read "How did our oil get under their sand." The cynic looks at PNAC and asks, "How did our frontier end up in Iraq's oil fields?"