Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonder who wrote (1257)	5/14/2003 8:29:45 AM
From: Dale Baker	Respond to of 20773

After watching this extended exercise in futility - who is the bigger scumbag, Bush or Clinton - a few things are clear. Both were intentionally evasive and deceptive about dubious actions in their past. Their intent was to dupe the electorate into voting for them based on a higher level of character than they actually possess. Both lied to the America public on the record while in office. One was reelected and the other probably will be. Shame on them? No, shame on us.

To: zonder who wrote (1257)	5/14/2003 11:21:21 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20773

I see you have found a lot of "allegations" & folks who speculate about brain chemistry. However, there was no reference to Bush saying, as you claimed, "I will not talk about things I did 10-20 years ago". There was absolutely no credible evidence to support your claims that Bush was "an alcoholic" or a "cocaine addict". None whatsoever. At best there was wild speculation & allegations from unnamed sources, but no specific credible evidence & nothing from GW himself that shows he is an alcoholic & cocaine addict. You said "You will find all that once you get started on Google." Even using your link, I cannot substantiate your spurious allegations no matter how hard I try. Can you point me to credible evidence to support your specific allegations?