Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (240560)	5/14/2003 9:59:36 AM
From: Shack	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 436258

Sad, isn't it? And its not like you guys don't have your own rabble-rousers.-g story.news.yahoo.com

To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (240560)	5/14/2003 10:40:30 AM
From: Earlie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

WF: I hate drugs with a passion (from earlier loss of a couple of great students) and I consider smoking anything to be about the wierdest self-administered stupidity I've ever seen, but as was the case with booze in the prohibition era, and highway speeding laws today, if 90% of the population doesn't think a "law" makes sense, it becomes non-enforceable. Take a look at the remarkable percentage of the US population that is incarcerated (an inordinate percentage of which is drug-related) and consider the staggering costs of this to your society. Better to bring it under the aegis of government regulation, legitimize it, and tax the heck out of it (as is the case with tobacco and booze). Kills two birds with one stone. And if a small percentage of the bucks currently spent on drug busting were to be diverted and spent on educating our young people on the topic, we might even see useage fall somewhat. JMHO. I think your leaders ought to pay a bit of attention to this Canuck. Best, Earlie Best, Earlie

To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (240560)	5/14/2003 12:51:00 PM
From: Terry Maloney	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

We're a non-nucular nation ... how could we possibly be sovereign? <g/ng>

To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (240560)	5/14/2003 7:41:39 PM
From: Terry Maloney	Respond to of 436258

edit

To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (240560)	5/14/2003 7:41:39 PM
From: Terry Maloney	Respond to of 436258

SI does it again ...