Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Heinz Blasnik- Views You Can Use -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LLCF who wrote (1229)	5/14/2003 10:03:39 AM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™	Respond to of 4916

now that's an amazing take off on Hesse but i certainly don't want to digress <g> please continue.

To: LLCF who wrote (1229)	5/14/2003 10:13:29 AM
From: zonder	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4916

she does not differentiate between the larger topic at hand and the small mechanisms within that topic. So she is drawn like a moth to fame to WHAT SHE KNOWS [or thinks she knows], and picks out flaws in the overall flow and gets mired down like a raft getting stuck in an eddy while the river of life passes by. Err, you could be talking about me, here, except that, of course, I don't agree with you that disproving the "flaws" on assumptions on which an argument is based is necessarily "getting stuck" etc. This is scientific methodology - i.e. if the assumptions are false, then the conclusions don't stand a chance. What you call "picking small flaws" is, most probably, actually undermining your whole argument. It's the sign of a mathematical mindset. Quite enervating to most people who don't think in these terms, apparently (I am told).