Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GVTucker who wrote (174568)	5/14/2003 11:00:56 AM
From: The Duke of URL©	Respond to of 186894

The original sale, yes. But not subsequent sales. Isn't that a distinction without a difference. The jurisdiction FOR SECURITIES FRAUD PURPOSES, NOT PROCEDURAL PURPOSES, is still the state where the purchaser resides. The problem you now introduce is called the "fraud on the market theory". The company claims, "we didn't sell you the stock" it was another shareholder. "We were just lying to sell our own stock which you can't prove you bought from us!!!!" As much as the perp would like, That dog don't hunt.