Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rkral who wrote (174580)	5/14/2003 2:04:19 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Respond to of 186894

If made, I serously doubt the point was made in conjuction with liquidation of the company .. as you stated earlier. Of course not, I was the one who said acting on shareholder's desires in some cases would only be enacted by a management team bent on total liquidation. The shareholders suggesting that tons of people get fired think that they are acting on the best interests of the company. The problem is, that in many cases they don't know what they are talking about. As far as digging up posts, I don't want to do that with SI's poor search algorithms, but if you want to see it, just look up techtonicbull or room222 from the Sun thread for their take on staffing levels, salary even location of HQ facilities which are appropriate for Sun. Really, it doesn't take much to see that many shareholders on SI feel that that they have the ability to make management level decisions which are more strategic than the management in charge. Lizzie