SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PROLIFE who wrote (406326)5/14/2003 6:29:21 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Is Dowd just stupid or a hibitual liar.
Wednesday, May 14, 2993

Gotcha, Sullivan Tells Times' Dowd

New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd had distorted a quote from President Bush, drawing a quick slap on the wrist from columnist Andrew Sullivan.

"In case you thought the Blair debacle was the only indicator of the Times' slide, you obviously haven't been reading Maureen Dowd," Sullivan wrote on his website. "Today featured a classic, well, distortion. Here's Dowd's dumb-as-a-post take on Bush's conduct of the war on terror:

"Busy chasing off Saddam," Dowd wrote, "the president and vice president had told us that Al Qaeda was spent. "Al Qaeda is on the run," President Bush said last week. "That group of terrorists who attacked our country is slowly but surely being decimated... They're not a problem anymore."

Wrong, as Sullivan points out. "Here's what Bush actually said: 'Al Qaeda is on the run. That group of terrorists who attacked our country is slowly, but surely being decimated. Right now, about half of all the top al Qaeda operatives are either jailed or dead. In either case, they're not a problem anymore."

In other words, the half of the top al Qaeda leadership that is dead or in jail are no longer a problem - not the whole outfit as Dowd wrongfully suggests.

It looks as if the Blair witch disorder is spreading around the Times.
newsmax.com



To: PROLIFE who wrote (406326)5/14/2003 6:52:36 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
HaHaHaHaHaHa!

I gave an answer FOUR TIMES! (Just not a 'yes or no' answer, since that isn't appropriate to the question.)

While YOU haven't answered EVEN ONCE, in ANY MANNER, 'yes, no, maybe, or whatever'.

What value do your beliefs place on cowardice and dissembling?