SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (11650)5/15/2003 9:42:08 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
EDS says SEC extends probe to U.S. Navy contract

NEW YORK, May 15 (Reuters) - Electronic Data Systems Corp. <EDS.N> revealed in a U.S. regulatory filing on Thursday that the Securities and Exchange Commission had extended a probe of the company to look at disclosures over a big Navy contract.

The company, the No. 2 supplier of computer services, was already under investigation by the SEC for a stock hedging strategy that went awry and the handling of its third-quarter 2002 warning of a drastic shortfall in its financial results.

The latest leg of the inquiry focused on last week's surprise news of a $334 million loss on its multiyear contract to modernize the internal computer networks of the U.S. Navy and Marines, a deal originally said to be worth $6.9 billion.

EDS of Plano, Texas, posted a sharp first-quarter net loss resulting from the Navy contract losses and it backed away from supporting the company's previous forecasts for the 2003 year.

"The SEC staff also requested certain documents related to that contract," EDS said of the Navy-Marine contract in a filing on Thursday related to its first quarter results.

Spokeswoman Liz Bonet said EDS could not provide any details on the specific documents requested by the SEC other than to say the company was continuing to cooperate fully with the government agency's inquiries.

It also reiterated that SEC staff are conducting a formal investigation of events surrounding its warning in September of last year that it would fall far short of Wall Street expectations, sending the stock into a spiral that has cost it three-quarters of its value.

The embattled company has been struggling through the collapse in recent years in technology spending by its blue-chip customer base and the bankruptcies of several high-profile customers for which it supplied services.

It has suffered a round of downgrades on its corporate debt rating, making it harder to borrow capital to fund operations. This, in turn, has made it harder for EDS to compete against rivals International Business Machines Corp. <IBM.N>, Accenture <ACN.N> and Hewlett-Packard Co. <HPQ.N> for the multibillion

dollar contracts that once were a mainstay of the company.

The company -- which in recent months hired new senior management including former CBS executive Michael Jordan, now the chairman and chief executive of EDS -- said it is in the process of responding to a subpoena and providing documents and information to the SEC staff.

"The company is unable to predict the outcome of the investigation or any action that the SEC might take," it said.

05/15/03 20:18 ET



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (11650)5/16/2003 1:47:22 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 19428
 
New charges for man with a history of fraud

He is accused of extorting millions from writers of bad checks

Friday, May 16, 2003

BY JOHN P. MARTIN
Star-Ledger Staff

Barry Sussman spent much of the 1980s honing his knowledge of the credit card industry and his skills at ripping it off.

During one prison stint for credit fraud, the Fort Lee resident wrote a 103-page how-to manual called "I Scam-You Scam" and distributed it to inmates. After skipping out on his probation and being declared a fugitive, Sussman sent his sentencing judge a photo of him atop a camel near the Egyptian pyramids.


Sussman, 42, has a wife, two kids and a law degree now, but authorities say he's not a changed man. Yesterday, state and federal regulators accused him of running a Secaucus-based collection agency that abused, harassed and extorted millions of dollars from people who allegedly passed bad checks.

Joe Hall, a plumber in Winter Haven, Fla., told investigators that a Sussman company collector phoned him 17 times in a 10 minutes one afternoon last fall, called Hall's mother "a racist (expletive)" and Hall a "(expletive) criminal" who was "worse than the Taliban."

The collector claimed Hall wrote a $62 check to Pet World that bounced. Hall said he didn't.

Stephanie Stephenson of Brewster, N.Y., said Sussman's collectors hounded her for $169 three years after she bought a $39 necklace by check from the Home Shopping Network. Stephenson said she had returned the necklace after it arrived broken.

"This message is for the criminal check writer, Stephanie Stephenson," said a message left on her answering machine. "You may need to turn yourself in to the local county sheriff's office."

Their accounts were included as evidence by Federal Trade Commission attorneys yesterday who persuaded a federal judge to freeze Sussman's assets and temporarily restrain his company, National Check Control, from using strong-armed collection tactics.

At the same time, the New Jersey attorney general's consumer affairs division sued Sussman in Superior Court in Hudson County, alleging 350 complaints against his companies.

Sussman insisted he had done nothing wrong.

"Evidently, there are a lot of people that don't like the fact that they are being aggressively pursued for their unlawful obligations," he said after a hearing in federal court in Newark. "We are the largest purchaser of bad checks in the United States. All I can say is this is a legitimate business."

Authorities aren't disputing the size of the business. They said Sussman's companies -- which also included Check Investors Inc., Check Enforcers Inc. and Jaredco -- collected as much as $10 million during the past two years from 42,000 consumers and millions of dollars more since 1995.

State Labor Department records submitted in the case suggest Sussman drew a salary close to $150,000 as the sole officer or a president of the companies.

In the process, regulators contend Sussman's collectors committed some of the most egregious violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act that they have encountered. They also said a federal grand jury is weighing criminal charges against the defendants.

FTC staff attorneys Gregory Ashe and Seena Gressin gave Chief U.S. District Judge John Bissell a foot-high stack of affidavits outlining complaints from individuals and government agencies.

They said Sussman and his partners -- his wife, Elisabeth, and lawyer Charles Hutchins -- are not licensed to collect debts in any state, have ignored cease-and-desist orders in at least six states, and are running a "boiler room" operation in Las Vegas in addition to their New Jersey call centers.

Sussman bought hundreds of thousands of bad checks for pennies on the dollar from legitimate companies that had written off the collections, officials said. The debts were often minor and sometimes accounting mistakes. Some of the victims didn't even know about the bad checks because their checkbooks had been stolen.

Sussman's collectors allegedly tacked illegal fees -- usually $125 or $130 -- onto the check balances. They also purported to be law enforcement personnel and threatened the debtors or their relatives with jail.

"Regardless of whether the consumers owed the debts or not, the defendants' allegedly aggressive and shameless tactics fly in the face of basic decency and New Jersey law," acting state Attorney General Peter Harvey said.

One woman told investigators the collector threatened that her kids would "be bringing their mommy care packages in prison." Another said she got a call in the morning in which she was told her husband would be arrested if he didn't pay by noon that day.

Dennis Snyder, a lawyer in Grand Blanc, Mich., said a collector demanded that he pay $612 for a $172 bad check written by his son, a Navy serviceman. The collector claimed he was a former military lawyer, and allegedly told Snyder, "Your son may be coming home (from the Navy) sooner than you think."

Sussman said nothing during the hearing, but his attorney, Steve LaCheen, argued that many of the allegations "are simply way off the mark."

LaCheen called the consumers "deadbeats" and contended that because Sussman bought the accounts outright, he was not a debt collector and thus not subject to federal regulations.

"I think my client had every right to do what he had to do," he said.

Bissell scheduled a June 9 hearing on whether to impose a permanent injunction.

In 1981, Sussman was arrested for impersonating an FBI agent while trying to collect a debt. He was sentenced to probation, but fled the country. He was captured in Florida in 1986 and ordered to serve two years in prison. Not long after, federal prosecutors filed new charges against him and he was sentenced to an additional five years. He served about half.

In the late 1990s, Sussman completed a law degree and applied to be licensed in New Jersey, but the state's board of bar examiners rejected him, citing his past.

John P. Martin covers federal courts and law enforcement. He can be reached at jmartin@starledger.com or (973) 622-3405.

» Send This Page | » Print This Page



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (11650)5/19/2003 3:56:46 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19428
 
Iraq war coins: A newly minted scam

Sunday, May 18, 2003 By Don Oldenburg The Washington Post

U.S. Mint officials were a little troubled when they saw a company called Razmataz Coins marketing “Operation Freedom” commemorative coins.

Appearing in pop-ups, spam and Web sites since the start of the war in Iraq, the ads claimed that the colorized tribute coins commemorating U.S. forces were “struck by the U.S. Mint.” They emphasized that the collectible, priced at $19.95, is a “legal tender U.S. coin” and comes with a “certificate of authenticity.”

But while the coin itself is a 2003 Kennedy half dollar and the handiwork of the U.S. Mint, the “limited edition” paint job on it displaying a bold-colored image of an American soldier against a backdrop of fighter jets and an America flag was not.

“Only the United States Congress can authorize an official commemorative coin program and only the U.S. Mint can produce them,” says Henrietta Holsman Fore, director of the U.S. Mint. “It is wrong to mislead consumers into thinking they are genuine.”

Three weeks ago , Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox filed a civil suit against Razmataz, based in Sterling Heights, Mich., calling its offer a “scam” that duped consumers into thinking the coins were official and falsely claimed their purchase would “help support” U.S. troops in Iraq. Since then, Razmataz has removed the ads from its Web sites and does not respond to phone calls or e-mails.

“We hear frequently from consumers about products they are buying. We hear questions asking if they are genuine, what their value might be,” says Fore of the commemorative coins and medallions that commercial mints hurry onto the market every time a world-shaking event occurs, such as the space shuttle Columbia crash.

The U.S. Mint creates only about two congressionally authorized commemoratives each year. The last two paid tribute to the Olympics in Salt Lake City and the 200th anniversary of the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. The next one, a “First Flight” coin, will celebrate the Wright Brothers’ achievement.

While it’s not illegal for a commercial mint to colorize coins or strike originally designed medallions, deceptive marketing is illegal.

Last summer, the U.S. Mint settled for $2.1 million copyright, trademark and false-advertising claims against a Minnesota company called the Washington Mint when the company wouldn’t stop deceptive advertising of unauthorized medallions bearing the copyright-protected image of Sacagawea.

For more information about commercially minted commemoratives, replicas, copies and colorized coins, click on “consumer awareness” at

usmint.gov

Consumers needing further clarification can call the U.S. Mint at (202) 354-7222.



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (11650)5/19/2003 5:00:30 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19428
 
HITLER, JUST LIKE CHER ifilm.com