Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike M who wrote (4413)	5/15/2003 7:08:15 AM
From: Mad2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5582

mad, I have gotten past the denigration of this small company from the likes of you guys. I don't care enough any more as it represents a very small part of my portfolio Of course its a small part of your portofolio, your position is down 75% from Feb, 2000 when you thought it was a great buy. The bigger the looser the smaller the portion of your porfolio it becomes......It would be ashamed if it has become a small part through selling as your opinion on GUMM/MTXX the past few years has been in support of the stock. Why would you claim publicly that its a sound investment and yet sell it? Never have quite understood the logic of those who "argue" the long side only to admit after it craters that they sold out. Why not admit that you and Dan have been wrong all along. I do, however, have to laugh that you refer to Dan as close minded while suggesting that the likes of you and Floyd somehow are open minded. It just ain't so. We're all close minded. Speak for yourself. Danny Boy is either close minded, stupid or has a unstated agenda. Most of Floyds posts are third party information (related to information posted here) not useless opinion such as you and Danny Boy. Really mad, who gives a damn? Presumably all on this thread. Why else would they be here. Why are you and Danny boy here? a) Disinterested shareholder? b) Inquiring mind seeking to expand your knowledge? c) Nothing else better to do? d) Hidden Agenda? For you Mike the answer is probably c. For Danny Boy d is the most likely answer. m2

To: Mike M who wrote (4413)	6/14/2003 6:50:47 PM
From: DanZ	Read Replies (40) \| Respond to of 5582

Hi, Mike. I came across a research report last week that was written by another analyst that discovered Matrixx and wrote a report on the company. He is the second analyst in about a month to write a report on this company, and I am pleased that the stock is finally getting some recognition by analysts. I am not going to post his name here, but I will provide some details from his report. He estimates that Matrixx will earn 30 cents per share in 2003, 45 cents per share in 2004, and 80 cents per share in 2005. His price target is $20, but if the market discounts earnings per share of 80 cents in 2005, and believes that the growth will continue in 2006, the stock will undoubtedly trade a lot higher than 20. My estimate of 26 cents per share in 2003 is based on revenue growth of 30% from 2002, but the company will make 30 cents per share if they grow revenues about 35%, which I think is very doable. If they grow revenues 40% this year, they would earn about 37 cents per share in 2003, and estimates for 2004 would go up. The only thing that I will say about the analyst here is that he previously worked as a securities analyst for Value Line and was the Executive Vice President-Research for a Boston based investment bank before starting his own firm. According to his bio, he seeks out "emerging growth stocks with uncommon investment potential", which fits this company well. If anyone wants his contact information, please PM me and I'll send it to you. Dan