SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DanZ who wrote (4415)5/15/2003 2:58:48 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 5582
 
From MTXX 10Q filed performanace deteriorating...income from operations down from 18% to 3%, net income down 18% from 1%.

THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
---------------------------------------
2003 2002
----------------- ------------------
Net sales $ 8,901,675 100% $ 5,067,511 100%
Cost of sales 2,649,045 30 1,247,236 25
----------- --- ----------- ---
Gross profit 6,252,630 70 3,820,275 75
Operating expenses 5,692,531 64 2,881,049 57
Research and development 310,762 3 26,545 --
----------- --- ----------- ---
Income from operations 249,337 3 912,681 18
Interest and other income 36,959 -- 113,693 2
Interest expense 85,835 1 182,213 3
----------- --- ----------- ---
Income before income taxes 200,461 2 844,161 17
Provision for income taxes 83,107 1 (84,702) (1)
----------- --- ----------- ---
Net Income $ 117,354 1% $ 928,863 18%
=========== === ===========



To: DanZ who wrote (4415)5/15/2003 2:59:48 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 5582
 
From MTXX 10Q

"OUR INABILITY TO PROVIDE SCIENTIFIC PROOF FOR PRODUCT CLAIMS MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR SALES"

Never seen this admission before, LOL



To: DanZ who wrote (4415)5/15/2003 9:59:27 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 5582
 
RICHARD A FRUEH, AND DONALD J Gunn JR. BOTH previous employers according to crd's where Soveriegn Equity Management and Chatfield and Dean.

Pre-paid legal buy reports both had 24 to 26 dollar price targets

Mere coincidence that Soveriegn mob Boiler Room had a price target of 24 to 26 dollars in 12 months the same as GunnAllen??

FROM BUSINESSWEEK MOB ON WALLSTREET STORY:

Listed in no official records is another address for Phil Abramo--one that is far more apropos for a man who is a hidden power in the brokerage industry. Until a couple of months ago, sources say, Abramo maintained an office on the 14th floor of 90 Broad St. in lower Manhattan, directly adjoining the New York office of Sovereign Equity Management. A door linked the two offices, and it was always open. ''I knew him as a stock promoter who always had stock deals. We hired brokers who were friends of his,'' says one Sovereign employee who requested anonymity. Sovereign CEO Glen T. Vittor denies that Abramo had any role in the firm.

"we hired brokers who were friends of his" LOL


Florida Profit

GUNN ALLEN HOLDINGS, INC.

PRINCIPAL ADDRESS

1715 N WESTSHORE BLVD

SUITE 775

TAMPA FL 33607

MAILING ADDRESS
1715 N WESTSHORE BLVD
SUITE 775
TAMPA FL 33607

Document Number
P97000016953 FEI Number
593427440 Date Filed
02/19/1997
State
FL Status
ACTIVE Effective Date
NONE
Last Event
AMENDMENT Event Date Filed
03/26/2003 Event Effective Date
NONE

Registered Agent

Name & Address
GUNN, DONALD J JR
1715 N WESTSHORE BLVD
SUITE 775
TAMPA FL 33607
Name Changed: 01/29/1998
Address Changed: 01/29/1998

Officer/Director Detail

Name & Address Title
FRUEH, RICHARD A
1715 N WESTSHORE BLVD SUITE 775

TAMPA FL 33607 D
GUNN, DONALD J JR.
1715 N WESTSHORE BLVD SUITE 775

TAMPA FL 33607 D
SAVAGE, ROBERT K
35 AEGEAN AVE

TAMPA FL 33606 D

Annual Reports
Report Year Filed Date Intangible Tax
2000 09/13/2000
2001 04/13/2001
2002 01/28/2002 N

View Events
View Name History
Document Images
Listed below are the images available for this filing.

03/26/2003 -- Amendment
02/21/2003 -- Amendment
06/04/2002 -- Amendment
05/14/2002 -- Merger
05/13/2002 -- Amendment
01/28/2002 -- ANNUAL REPORT
04/13/2001 -- ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP
09/13/2000 -- ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP
04/09/1999 -- ANNUAL REPORT
01/29/1998 -- ANNUAL REPORT

===========================

Mere coincidence that both had a price target of 24 to 26 dollars in 12 months?

================================================

TAMPA, Fla., March 19 /PRNewswire/ -- The following was issued today by GunnAllen Financial: GunnAllen Financial is initiating coverage of Pre-Paid Legal Services Inc ($16.50) with a Strong Buy rating. PPD recently reported record earnings and revenues for the year-end 1996. Revenues for 1996 were $59.9M vs. $37.1M in 1995, up 61% while 1996 earnings surged to 56c per share compared to 34c per share in 1995, up 65% fully diluted. The production of new memberships rose 77% for 1996 and new sales associates rose 38%. The company currently has $18M in cash with
no debt and generated almost $1M in positive cash flow in Q4 1996 alone.
We are continuing to see margin improvements resulting from economies of scale and an increase in the average yearly contract premiums from $165/year in 1993, to $216/year in 1996. PPD's cash resources should allow them to continue to meet demand of their growth. Much like HMOs were in the past, legal maintenance organizations or LMOs, seem to be the wave of the future. We expect revenue and earnings growth of 40% for 1997, raising earnings estimates to 80c per share from 56c in 1996. Because of the strong growth ahead, we feel the stock is a great buy here and especially on any pullbacks. Considering the estimated 40% growth rate, we feel the company can maintain a P/E ratio of 30+ which would give the stock a 12-month target of $24.00-$26.00.

===========================

Sovereign Equity raises Pre-Paid Legal Services to STRONG BUY from BUY

BOCA RATON, Fla., Jan. 31 /PRNewswire/ -- The following was released by
Sovereign Equity Management: Sovereign Equity Management Corporation is raising our rating on Pre-paid
Legal Services (AMEX: PDD)(16.50) to Strong Buy from BUY due to the
tremendous growth and demand for pre-paid legal insurance. Pre-Paid Legal Services (PPD) recently reported record earnings and revenues
for the year-end 1996. Revenues for 1996 were $59.9M vs. $37.1M in 1995 (up
61%), while 1996 earnings surged to 56c per share compared to 34c per share
in 1995 (up 65% fully diluted). The production of new memberships rose 77%
for 1996 and new sales associates rose 38%. PPD enters their 25th year, they continue to benefit from our ever
increasing litigious society. Most Americans can not afford legal help, and
this is causing a change in the delivery of legal services. According to the
Maryland Bar Journal, recent studies have shown that the average
middle-income household in Maryland faces 1 legal problem per year. Out of
these households, 72% do not contact an attorney when they have a legal
problem. Pre-Paid Legal's insurance plan would allow many of these families
to afford the legal help they need and deserve. PPD is currently the only
pre-paid legal services company in the nation with a large marketing force.
The market potential is estimated at $15 to $25 billion. The company launched their new fast start training program for 1997 that
should have a favorable impact on recruiting and membership sales. Several
large corporations such as Hardees Restaurants are offering Pre-Paid Legal's
insurance plan as a part of their employee benefits program. Sales by group
certified associates currently account for roughly 50% of sales and are
expected to grow to 60% of sales by year-end 1997. The company currently has $17M in cash with no debt and generated almost $1M
in positive cash flow in Q4 1996 alone.
We are continuing to see margin
improvements resulting from economies of scale and an increase in the
average yearly contract premiums from $165 per year in 1993, to $216 per
year in 1996. Clearly PPD has enough resources to continue to meet demand of
this fantastic growth. Much like HMOs, legal maintenance organizations or
LMOs, seem to be the wave of the future. If you do not have pre-paid legal
insurance now, it's probably only a matter of time before you will. How can
America argue with having an attorney on call for less than your cable TV
bill? We expect revenue and earnings' growth of 40% for 1997, raising earnings per
share to 80c from 56c in 1996. Because of the strong growth ahead, we feel
the stock is a great buy here and especially on any pullbacks. Considering
the estimated 40% growth rate, we feel the company can maintain a P/E ratio
of 3O+ which would give the stock a l2-month target of $24.00 - $26.00. This report is for information purposes only, and under no circumstances is
it a solicitation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. The information
contained herein has been obtained from sources believed by us to be
reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete. Sovereign
Equity Management Corp. may or may not maintain a position or make a market
in the securities listed herein, its employees and/or its officers and
directors, may from time to time have a long or short position in the
securities mentioned herein and may sell or buy such securities or related
options. Sovereign Equity Management Corporation is a full service broker/dealer
serving retail and institutional clients with offices in Boca Raton, New
York, and Tampa. /CONTACT: S. Matthew Totty, Chief Equity Analyst, Sovereign Equity
Management Corporation, 813-282-0808/ 10:27 EST

==================================



To: DanZ who wrote (4415)5/15/2003 10:31:03 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 5582
 
File for: CRD# 1442917 DONALD JAMES GUNN JR Data Current as of: 05/14/2003

PREVIOUS EMPLOYMENT

This section provides 10 years of an individual's employment history. If the individual is currently registered with NASD, employment history will be displayed for the previous 10 years. If the individual is not currently registered with NASD, employment history will be displayed for the 10 years prior to termination of the registration. The firm's CRD number, the office of employment address where the broker was employed, and the dates of employment will be displayed.

If the broker was previously employed with an investment adviser, the investment adviser's name and CRD number will display. However, additional information is not available on investment advisers through the Public Disclosure Program as they are not NASD registered firms.

If the broker was previously employed with a firm registered with any self-regulatory organization other than NASD (e.g., the NYSE), either the firm's name or "Other Business" will display as the Employing Firm. To obtain the firm's name when "Other Business" displays as the Employing Firm, please call the Public Disclosure Call Center Hotline number, 1-800-289-9999.

A Firm CRD Number will not display for employing firms that are not NASD registered firms. Information on these employing firms is not available through the Public Disclosure Program.

Employing Firm: SOVEREIGN EQUITY MANAGEMENT CORP.
Firm CRD Number:
Office of Employment
Address: TAMPA, FL
Start Date: 12/1995
End Date: 03/1997

Employing Firm: W.J. GALLAGHER & COMPANY, INC.
Firm CRD Number:
Office of Employment
Address: TAMPA, FL
Start Date: 07/1995
End Date: 12/1995

Employing Firm: CHATFIELD DEAN & CO., INC.
Firm CRD Number:
Office of Employment
Address: TAMPA, FL
Start Date: 11/1990
End Date: 07/1995



To: DanZ who wrote (4415)5/15/2003 10:34:14 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 5582
 
gunnallen and ecconect
ecconect 3/1/2002

(10) On May 24, 2000, the company issued two warrants covering a total of 500,000 shares of common stock, exercisable at $0.50 through May 24, 2005 under a warrant agreement with GunnAllen Financial, Inc. in connection with this firm's services in assisting the company to become relisted on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board valued at $20,000.



To: DanZ who wrote (4415)5/15/2003 10:43:35 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 5582
 
Wonder who Scott Zimmerman is?

"A family member of an associate of GunnAllen Financial Services, a member of the selling group, was issued 2,500 shares of Common Stock for $3,650."

Oh look, there is BUSINESS WEEK MOB AND WALLSTREET Philip Gurian


Bobby Allison Wireless sb-2/a 5/5/1997

April 1996 to August 1996, certain Related Persons were issued unregistered shares of the Common Stock as follows: (i) certain associates of the Managing Underwriter were, in the aggregate, issued 32,000 shares of Common Stock for $800.00; (ii) a family member of an associate of GunnAllen Financial Services, a member of the selling group, was issued 2,500 shares of Common Stock for $3,650; and (iii) an affiliate of South Beach Capital Markets Advisory Corporation, a financial advisor and finder, was issued, in the aggregate, 8,056 shares of Common Stock for $25,100. All of such Related Persons have agreed not to, directly or indirectly, sell, transfer, assign, pledge, hypothecate or otherwise dispose of any of their shares of Common Stock for twelve (12) months following the date of this Prospectus except by (i) operation of law or (ii) by reason of reorganization of the Company. Additionally, the Company paid a fee of $6,350 to South Beach Capital Markets Advisory Corporation for services rendered and $25,000 to its former managing underwriter as reimbursement for certain expenses that the Company had agreed to pay.
================================================

ITEM 26. RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES The following is a summary of the transactions by Registrant since the Registrant's incorporation on April 19, 1996, involving sales of Registrant's securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"). All financial information and share data set forth below gives effect to a one for two reverse split of the Common Stock effected on May 5, 1997. On April 19 and 20, 1996, the founding shareholders of the Company (Marc Fishman, Kevin Killoran, Allan Fishman, Thomas Vittor, Richard Gurian, Tim Flavin, Charles Northington, Richard Thal, David Lansburgh, Scott Zimmerman, David Kusiel, Lowell Williams, John Semyan, and James Holbrook) received 950,000 shares of Common Stock for no consideration. The issuances of these 950,000 shares were deemed exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance on Section 4(2) of such Act. In addition, the recipients of the 950,000 shares of founders' Common Stock represented their intentions to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a view to or for sale in connection with any distribution thereof and appropriate legends were affixed to the share certificates. On May 15, 1996, the Company closed a $30,100 offering of 752,500 shares of Common Stock at $.04 per share. The purchasers of the Common Stock at $.04 per share (Allan Fishman, Thomas Vittor, Scott Zimmerman, Robert S. Davimos, Jeannine Gurian, Henry Allen, Philip Gurian, Robert Zara, Bauman Ltd., Gary Kelman, H&H Partnership, Laura Fiero, Reinerman Ltd., Arnold Jaffee, Yale Fishman, Leon Katz, Logan Davis, Nathan Nacklas, Richard H. Davimos, Jr., and Osmond Howe) would have forfeited their shares if they failed to purchase shares of Common Stock in subsequent offerings so that the Company would have received $350,000 in capital contributions by the consummation of the first follow-up offering of Common Stock, and $2,500,000 in capital contributions by the consummation of the second follow-up offering of Common Stock. On May 17, 1996, the Company closed a $356,950 offering of 257,500 shares of Common Stock at $1.39 per share (purchasers: Richard Gurian, Robert S. Davimos, Jeannine Gurian, H&H Partnership, Richard H. Davimos, Richard H. Davimos, Jr., John L. Davimos, Melissa Warman, Carol Miller, Mario Arace, Lynn Tilton, Osmond Howe, Frank Hernandez, Wayne Sewell, Michael Clair, Elliot Starman, J. Barrie Farrington, Timothy Gula, and Don Brennan). The issuance of the 752,500 shares of Common Stock at $.04 per share and the 257,500 shares of Common Stock at $1.39 per share were deemed exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance on Rule 506 promulgated under the Securities Act. All recipients had adequate access to information about the Registrant. The Registrant believes that all of the purchasers of the Common Stock in the offerings at $.04 per share and $1.39 per share were accredited investors as defined in Rule 501 promulgated under the Securities Act. On August 30, 1996, the Company closed a $3,375,000 offering of 750,000 shares of Common Stock at $4.50 per share. Sovereign Equity Management Corporation, served as the Placement Agent in the 750,000 share offering, for which it received a fee in the form of a Placement Agent's discount of $337,500 (10% of the gross proceeds of this offering) and a non-accountable expense allowance of $101,250 (3% of the gross proceeds of this offering). The Company believes that the issuance of the 750,000 shares of Common Stock at $4.50 per share was deemed exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act in reliance on Rule 506 promulgated under the Securities Act. All recipients of the Common Stock in this offering at $4.50 per share were "accredited investors" within the meaning of Rule 501 promulgated under the Securities Act and had adequate access to the information about the Registrant, and the recipients represented their intentions to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a view to or for sale in connection with any distribution. Appropriate legends were affixed to the share certificates. The Registrant believes that all of the purchasers of the Common Stock in the $4.50 per share offering were accredited investors as defined in Rule 501 promulgated under the Securities Act. On May 15, 1996, the Company granted options to Bruce S. Foerster, a consultant to the Company, to acquire 2,500 shares of the Company's Common Stock under the 1996 Stock Option Plan at an option exercise price of $.04 per share which were immediately exercisable on the grant date. On April 22, 1997, Mr. Foerster acquired 2,500 shares of Common Stock from the Company pursuant to the exercise of these options for an aggregate purchase price of $100 pursuant to an exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Rule 506 thereunder. The Registrant believes that Mr. Foerster is an accredited investor as defined in Rule 501 of the Securities Act.



To: DanZ who wrote (4415)5/15/2003 10:54:25 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 5582
 
BOBBY ALISON WIRELESS gilardi.com



To: DanZ who wrote (4415)5/16/2003 1:04:07 AM
From: Mad2  Respond to of 5582
 
Message 18946128
What is it Danny, d) eh?
Come on you tried you hardest to keep as many lemmings in this POS with your bs analysis.
Pat yourself on the back Danny Boy, mission accomplished. Kept your cool through thick and thin and never wavered in your blind support for GUMM.
m2



To: DanZ who wrote (4415)5/19/2003 1:07:00 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 5582
 
I JUST RAN THE PHONE NUMBER OF SOVERIGN ON GOODLE. A GREAT FIND SINCE IT IS GUNNALLENS PHONE NUMBER. LOL AINT KIDDING GO TO SEARCH

google.com

GUNNALLEN HAS THE SAME PHONE NUMBER AS SOVERIEGN OR ARE THEY ONE IN THE SAME? LOL

==================================================

/CONTACT: S. Matthew Totty, Chief Equity Analyst, Sovereign Equity
Management Corporation, 813-282-0808/
(PPD)

SOVEREIGN EQUITY RAISES PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES TO STRONG BUY
1997-01-31 10:42 (New York)

BOCA RATON, Fla., Jan. 31 /PRNewswire/ -- The following was released by
Sovereign Equity Management:

Sovereign Equity Management Corporation is raising our rating on Pre-paid
Legal Services (AMEX: PDD)(16.50) to Strong Buy from BUY due to the tremendous
growth and demand for pre-paid legal insurance.
Pre-Paid Legal Services (PPD) recently reported record earnings and
revenues for the year-end 1996. Revenues for 1996 were $59.9M vs. $37.1M in
1995 (up 61%), while 1996 earnings surged to 56c per share compared to 34c per
share in 1995 (up 65% fully diluted). The production of new memberships rose
77% for 1996 and new sales associates rose 38%.
PPD enters their 25th year, they continue to benefit from our ever
increasing litigious society. Most Americans can not afford legal help, and
this is causing a change in the delivery of legal services. According to the
Maryland Bar Journal, recent studies have shown that the average middle-income
household in Maryland faces 1 legal problem per year. Out of these
households, 72% do not contact an attorney when they have a legal problem.
Pre-Paid Legal's insurance plan would allow many of these families to afford
the legal help they need and deserve. PPD is currently the only pre-paid
legal services company in the nation with a large marketing force. The market
potential is estimated at $15 to $25 billion.
The company launched their new fast start training program for 1997 that
should have a favorable impact on recruiting and membership sales. Several
large corporations such as Hardees Restaurants are offering Pre-Paid Legal's
insurance plan as a part of their employee benefits program. Sales by group
certified associates currently account for roughly 50% of sales and are
expected to grow to 60% of sales by year-end 1997.
The company currently has $17M in cash with no debt and generated almost
$1M in positive cash flow in Q4 1996 alone. We are continuing to see margin
improvements resulting from economies of scale and an increase in the average
yearly contract premiums from $165 per year in 1993, to $216 per year in 1996.
Clearly PPD has enough resources to continue to meet demand of this fantastic
growth. Much like HMOs, legal maintenance organizations or LMOs, seem to be
the wave of the future. If you do not have pre-paid legal insurance now,
it's probably only a matter of time before you will. How can America argue
with having an attorney on call for less than your cable TV bill?

We expect revenue and earnings' growth of 40% for 1997, raising earnings
per share to 80c from 56c in 1996. Because of the strong growth ahead, we
feel the stock is a great buy here and especially on any pullbacks.
Considering the estimated 40% growth rate, we feel the company can maintain a
P/E ratio of 3O+ which would give the stock a l2-month target of $24.00 -
$26.00.
This report is for information purposes only, and under no circumstances
is it a solicitation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. The
information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed by us to
be reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete.
Sovereign Equity Management Corp. may or may not maintain a position or make
a market in the securities listed herein, its employees and/or its officers
and directors, may from time to time have a long or short position in the
securities mentioned herein and may sell or buy such securities or related
options.
Sovereign Equity Management Corporation is a full service broker/dealer
serving retail and institutional clients with offices in Boca Raton, New York,
and Tampa.

SOURCE Sovereign Equity Management Corporation
-0- 1/31/97
/CONTACT: S. Matthew Totty, Chief Equity Analyst, Sovereign Equity
Management Corporation, 813-282-0808/
(PPD)

CO: Sovereign Equity Management Corporation; Pre-Paid Legal Services
ST: Florida
IN: FIN
SU:

-0- (PRN) Jan/31/97 10:27
EOS (PRN) Jan/31/97 10:27 86

-0- (PRN) Jan/31/97 10:42

SOVEREIGN EQUITY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION UPGRADES
1995-12-26 15:20 (New York)

PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES TO STRONG BUY FROM BUY

BOCA RATON, Fla., Dec. 26 /PRNewswire/ -- Sovereign Equity
Management Corporation today issued the following statement:

We are upgrading our Pre-Paid Legal Services (AMEX: PPD) (9.68) BUY
recommendation to STRONG BUY due to increased contract sales, strong
projected earnings per share and favorable technical indicators.
For the cumulative 11 months, production of new memberships rose
199% to 99,406 from 41,599. PPD continues to increase contracts by
expanding into new states. PPD is a pioneer in an emerging growth
industry. Their industry today is in a position similar to that of
prepaid medical care approximately 30 years ago. It is PPD's
expectation that the prepaid legal services industry will develop over
the next few years much to the same degree as prepaid medical plans
have. As a pioneer and leader in the field, PPD is positioned to take
advantage of this emerging growth industry. Experts believe the market
for prepaid legal plans is between 100 to 140 million Americans. This
places the dollar size of the market somewhere between 15 and 25 billion
dollars. According to an American Bar Association survey of middle-
income households, it was found that at the time they were interviewed
52% of the households had at least one new or ongoing legal problem.
PPD is expected to grow earnings per share at 50% per year for the
next five years according to First Call. PPD's 1995 earnings rose from
$2.5 million to $5 million on 43% higher revenues with 64% more shares.
This is due primarily to increased contract sales and the elimination of
debt. Sales for the third quarter ending September, 1995 were a record
$9.8 million, that is a 53% increase over third quarter last year. With
lower interest expense and higher contract sales, earnings estimates for
1996 are $0.55, that's an estimated 57% over 1995 earnings of $0.35.
The new contract numbers for December are due out in the first week in
January which should confirm our expectation of growth. We expect Q495
earnings per share $0.10 versus $0.06 for Q494, a 67% increase. The
earnings are expected to be released on Jan. 29, 1996.
PPD has just broken out of a strong 3-month base into new ground
above $8.87, as the technical indicators were suggesting in my November
report. This confirms our belief that PPD is undervalued and under-
followed. The breakout volume was 293,300 which suggests strong
interest and confirms the advancement. PPD has good support around

$7.50, and should be accumulated under $10.00 as long as the stock does
not breakdown below $7.50 on heavy volume. We rate PPD a strong buy
with a 6-12 month target of $12-$13.
-0- 12/26/95
/CONTACT: S. Matthew Totty, Chief Equity Analyst, Sovereign Equity
Management Corporation, 813-282-0808/
(PPD)

CO: Pre-Paid Legal Services; Sovereign Equity Management Corporation
ST: Florida
IN: FIN
SU: RTG

-0- (PRN) Dec/26/95 15:05
EOS (PRN) Dec/26/95 15:05 86

-0- (PRN) Dec/26/95 15:20



To: DanZ who wrote (4415)5/19/2003 6:03:10 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 5582
 
"Realityman3" "PHIL GARIAN" AND THE gumball

realityman3's posts on GUMM

Posts 2-1 of 2 posts « Previous 30 | Next 30 »
Subject Date

MARGIN CALLS HERE? 05 Dec 2000
1:29 PM EST

Something in the Q that Wall Street does not like? 05 Dec 2000
1:25 PM EST
=====================================



To: DanZ who wrote (4415)5/19/2003 6:05:15 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 5582
 
'Cleerhead' and 'Realityman3'

Stock trader denies ties to HiEnergy, mafia
But sealed grand jury indictment alleges mob connection
Posted: March 10, 2003
2:42 a.m. Eastern

By Sherrie Gossett
© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

Professional stock trader Phil Gurian discussed the recent controversy surrounding him and his alleged ties with the mafia and with aviation security company HiEnergy Technologies Inc. of Irvine, Calif., in an exclusive two-hour interview with WorldNetDaily.

For a long time, little has been known or written about the brilliant and soft-spoken Gurian, save a landmark 1997 Business Week article identifying him as the reputed right-hand man of the under-boss of the DeCavalcante crime family.

Now, a controversy sparked by last week's Dow Jones newswire article by Carol Remond threatens the reputation of HiEnergy and persons associated with the company – including its consultant, Isaac Yeffet, former head of the Israeli Secret Service.

The recent Dow Jones article connected persons involved with HiEnergy's reverse merger with SLW Enterprises to Boca Raton resident Gurian. In "HiEnergy and a man named Gurian," reporter Remond showed that the controlling stockholder of SLW Enterprises, a shell company, was one Rheal Cote, whose address was the same as that of Jeanine Gurian, Phil Gurian's mother. In addition, Remond reported that one-time market-maker Metro Trading Inc. was staffed with alumni from Sovereign Equity Management Company, allegedly controlled by Gurian and DeCavalcante capo Phil Abramo, and named in court documents as having engaged in securities fraud and extortion.

After HiEnergy stock dropped, the company released a statement: "We have become aware of rumors regarding certain stockholders and their relationship to a person who has previously been involved in stock manipulation schemes." The statement noted that an independent investigative team found "no evidence of wrongdoing on the part of the current executive management team, or following the reverse merger with SLW."

However, the report added, "there is insufficient evidence to fully conclude that there was no wrongdoing by SLW Enterprises prior to the April 2002 reverse merger."

When the Dow Jones article was published, former HiEnergy CEO Barry Alter was serving as a director of the company. Alter was the one who was officially responsible for HiEnergy's IPO.

Yesterday, Alter told WND, "Right now today, I don't have a title with HiEnergy anymore. I was the president and CEO for a while before Tom Pascoe stepped in and I stayed on as a director and a consultant. And I've recently resigned as a director and a consultant." Alter confirmed the change in title came after the Dow Jones article, "but those were my intentions anyway," he said.

The Dow Jones article raises serious questions. Who is Phil Gurian, and is he a mafia man? Are there connections between Gurian and HiEnergy Technologies? If so, what are those connections? Are they discoverable? Is there mob money behind HiEnergy, and if so, do investors really care? Investors and experts are also wondering whether a Gurian connection would imply HiEnergy's neutron-beam explosive detection system is vaporware, or if real, is it being exaggerated when presented as currently commercially viable? Or did Gurian's mother's boyfriend simply profit handsomely from a reverse-merger?

The day Remond's article came out, Gurian contacted WND via "lifetime friend" and HiEnergy investor Hal Schoenfeld, also known as "Fresco." Fresco requested a meeting with WND, himself and Gurian that night at Gurian's Boca Raton home at 7763 Mandarin Drive. WND instead met with Fresco and Gurian at O'Hara's nightclub in Hollywood the following night from 9:30 to 11:45.

It is the only interview Gurian has ever given the press.

'Phil has a PR problem'

Fresco had told WND prior to the interview, "Phil has a PR problem." WND questioned Fresco prior to the interview, during which time Fresco admitted that years ago he had been called in by the FBI, who several years ago were questioning all of Gurian's friends. He added, in a rambling conversation, "He's never threatened me. He would never threaten a life-long friend." He added that Gurian had done "some bad things," that he himself "had gotten involved," and added, "I've always done very well with Phil," alluding to stock deals the two had been involved in. An unnamed source told WND, "Hal's running scared."

Schoenfeld invited WND to investigate the matter, saying, ironically, "I realize your article may turn out to be worse than Remond's."

Gurian told WND he simply had become involved in the sales of "Reg" S securities, and mentioned a "conspiracy" on the part of the SEC to go after the "little guys." He said that he erred in that he knew the companies whose stock he was purchasing were engaged in fraud. Gurian said at the time he rationalized that since he wasn't engaged in fraud, it was OK. He acknowledged that his prior activities were wrong, but complained that he was not engaged currently in any wrongdoing, and for that reason thought the Dow Jones article unfair. Gurian added that he was involved in a number of good works, which he kept private.

Arrested in Switzerland after an arrest warrant was issued in the U.S., Gurian now awaits sentencing. During the interview, he voiced concerns that the Remond article may influence a judge and affect his sentencing.

He also flatly denied that he had anything to do with HiEnergy Technologies. Former HiEnergy CEO Barry Alter was a friend of his, he said, and that was the sole connection. Alter confirmed to WND that the two were friends. "Oh God, I met him many, many years ago down in Florida. We played golf together," he said.

Gurian also said that he had never seen HiEnergy's technology, and had no personal knowledge of it. As for Rheal Cote, Gurian pal Schoenfeld identified him as the French boyfriend of Gurian's mother, Jeanine Gurian.

Gurian's statements contradicted those of "lifetime friend" Schoenfeld, who had previously told WND that Gurian "handled" the HiEnergy IPO and was busy behind the scenes raising money for the company. At that time, Shoenfeld had described Gurian to WND as a "very successful guy who manages the assets of others and his own assets. He's a professional stock trader. He does very well."

The National Association of Securities Dealers permanently barred Gurian from the securities business in March 1995.

WND asked Gurian, in Schoenfeld's presence, about the seeming discrepancy in comments. Gurian responded by saying he had given contacts to Alter, but did not want to say that previously, because "it would kill me." In a taped interview with WND, HiEnergy's former CEO confirmed that Gurian had passed on investor contacts to him. "They were just people who we both knew … who I contacted to see if they wanted to invest in the company. That's all." Alter declined to name any of the investors, saying the information was "private." Alter said, "I raised them [HiEnergy Technologies] a bunch of money."

Gurian's statement that he had never verified the existence of HiEnergy's neutron detection system raises more questions. Gurian is the control man behind WallStreetSpin.com, managing and writing for the site. Months ago, Gurian produced a bullish report on HiEnergy which was recommended to the investing public by former CEO Alter in a HiEnergy press release.

During the interview, Gurian indicated that all the preliminary research into HiEnergy, prior to the reverse merger with SLW Enterprises, was done by Greg Gilbert, currently a director for HiEnergy. Gilbert is also CEO and president of Hamilton-Biophile Companies, formed by merging Hamilton-Clarke and the remains of Mehl/Biophile following the removal of all Mehl management.

Mehl/Biophile's founder, Thomas Louis Mehl Sr., has been described as a "fixture in the world of hair removal scams." One website gives a timeline of his "sordid career in hair removal."

Gilbert's hair-removal website informs readers that highly skilled employees of related Hamilton-Clarke division work on "highly secret" projects.

Hamilton-Clarke, a division of Hamilton-Biophile, has diabetes clinics in Florida.

Gurian also had previously told WND that he "had" a couple of diabetes clinics in Florida. WND asked him if these were related to HiEnergy's Gilbert.

"The Diabetes clinics do not have anything to do with Hamilton Clarke," Gurian said. "That is a separate company that I am helping fund."

When asked whether he was involved with the mob, Gurian laughed and denied to WND that he had anything to do with the mafia.

WND also posed a question market watchers were asking: Could money-laundering be going on at HiEnergy? A wide-eyed Gurian responded, "Money laundering? I don't know anything about that. How would you do that?"

Sealed indictment alleges mafia conspiracy

WorldNetDaily has obtained the sealed 21-count grand jury indictment, filed in the Middle Court in Florida in 1999, which accuses Phil Gurian, DeCavalcante mafia capo Phil Abramo, Louis Consalvo (a/k/a LOUIE "EGGS"), Glen T. Vittor and Barry Gesser of conspiracy, racketeering, securities fraud, extortion, mail and wire fraud – and money laundering.

The sealed indictment also includes details of the murder of Bahamian national Joy Cartwright.

In addition, the indictment alleges that Bahamian attorney Obie Pindling, son of former Prime Minister Sir Lynden Pindling (deceased) opened up accounts for the mafia and was a signatory on at least one of their brokerage accounts.

The sealed indictment also makes repeated reference to a company known as "Alter Sales Inc." – from which the defendants received millions of shares.

An inside source told WND that Alter Sales Inc. was controlled by one "Barry Alter." The source, who spoke on condition of anonymity, indicated that Alter Sales was initially controlled by Barry's brother Herb. Upon Herb's death, Barry took control around 1992-1993.

The indictment accuses Gurian et al of causing Alter Sales Inc. (along with two other companies) to issue false and fraudulent press releases regarding present and future business and financial soundness in order to "pump" the stock prices.

WND asked former HiEnergy CEO Barry Alter, whether he was the control man behind Alter Sales Inc. "I've never been involved with Alter Sales Inc. … I never was … I've never even heard of Alter Sales." Alter added, "Apparently the guy who was involved in that company was Herb Alter. A fellow named Herb Alter started the company and that's why they named it Alter Sales. Herb Alter apparently was … is Alter Sales."

Barry Alter told WND that he does not have a brother, that he never took over the company, adding, "That's not even remotely true." He added that he had heard Alter Sales was a company Phil Gurian had "problems" with back in 1995. He called it a rumor, adding, "I'm sure it must be that Carol Remond [of Dow Jones newswire] running around trying to write more stories about me." Remond was not the source.

A different SEC litigation involving Alter Sales Inc. describes it as "a Florida distributor of automotive parts and accessories," and identifies Marc Osheroff as the CEO. Those SEC documents also refer to a "Martin Clainey." Clainey was an alias used by Phil Gurian, a fact not revealed in that particular litigation. It is not known whether other fictitious names appear in the SEC document.

Many documents in the Grand Jury case remain sealed.

The conspiracy

The sealed indictment alleges the five men orchestrated an elaborate "pump-and-dump" scheme through brokerage houses controlled by Abramo and Gurian, resulting in the defendants reaping profits in the tens of millions of dollars.

The men solicited corporations who were in financial difficulty for the purpose of distributing stock to the public, including "Regulation S" and Initial Public Offering (IPO) distributions. "Regulation S" was a regulation promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission wherein restricted stock could be sold to foreign nationals with the provision that the stock certificates would be taken offshore and not sold for the required 40-day "safe harbor" period.

To that end, the defendants caused Bahamian companies to be formed for the purpose of obtaining discounted stock from the companies. The stock would then be sold at market value through Sovereign Equity Management Company – who manipulated the stock via a "pump-and-dump" scheme.

Sovereign Equity Management Corporation had its principal place of business at 5200 Town Center Circle, Boca Raton, and Falcon Trading Group was at the same location. Both were involved in stock brokerage services including the retail sale of securities to the public. Falcon was a hedge fund trading in its own account involving the purchase and sale of securities as well as "short selling" of securities. Glen Vittor is named as the sole stockholder and CEO of Sovereign and Falcon.

The indictment alleges that Gurian (a/k/a Martin Clainey), although barred for life from the securities industry by the NASD, had a hidden interest and exercised control over the trading decisions of both Sovereign and Falcon.

It also alleges that Phil Abramo, (a/k/a/ Lou Metzer) was a "capo" or "captain" of the DeCavalcante crime family of Cosa Nostra, and exercised similar control over the operations of the Sovereign branches located in Manhattan.

Louis Consalvo (a/k/a LOUIE "EGGS") is described as the brother-in-law of defendant Philip Abramo, and a "made" member of the DeCavalcante family. "Made" members are also called "soldiers," "wiseguys" and "goodfellas." He is described as having relayed messages from Abramo to members of the Manhattan Sovereign management.

Barry Gesser allegedly owned and operated Atlantis Securities, Apollo Equities and Discovery Trading, their principal place of business being in Boca Raton, Fla.

The 'pump and dump'

Sovereign brokers were instructed by the defendants to "pump up" the price of the stock of these financially troubled corporations with false statements as to the viability of the companies.

Sovereign brokers were provided with unlawful "juice" payments in order to "push" the stock on the investing public. The brokers were instructed not to permit retail customers to sell the stock, thereby keeping the price of the stock artificially high. When the price reached an acceptable level, the defendants "dumped" or sold their discounted stock for profits in the tens of millions of dollars.

Then Sovereign brokers would cease pumping the stock, while the defendants, through Falcon and other entities, then "shorted" the stocks. The term "selling short" means to borrow stock owned by others and in the custody of a brokerage firm and to sell it at the current market price, promising to replace the shares of stock so borrowed at a later date. Short sellers make money by betting a stock will go down, rather than up.

Many of the companies went bankrupt and the stock became worthless. The retail customers of Sovereign, and other brokerage firms, who purchased the stock at the urging of Sovereign brokers, lost all or most of their investment. In the meantime, the defendants reaped tens of millions of dollars of profits, which was transferred to offshore corporations in the Bahamas that they controlled.

When the defendants could not find stock to borrow and sell "short" or to "cover" their "short positions," the indictment alleges they engaged in extortion of other brokers in order to obtain the stock using their stated relationship to the "mafia" and also using threats to commit bodily harm.

Business Week reporter Gary Weiss previously reported that the DeCavalcante gang's infiltration of Wall Street included the pistol-whipping of Wall Street brokers in order to force them to handle stocks according to the mob's commands. Frightened brokers refused to go to the police. One allegedly went to another mob for protection, and subsequently received an expensive bottle of wine as an introductory "gift." The DeCavalcantes' Wall Street invasion was said to combine a brilliant knowledge of securities fraud and hair-trigger, grisly violence. Fresco told WND on numerous occasions that the Weiss article was "excellent, very well-written."

Murder , threats, money laundering

The indictment alleges that when money was authorized to be wire transferred by Joy Cartwright, described as a Bahamian nominee of one of the Bahamian corporations controlled by the defendants, she was murdered and the broker who had transferred the money was threatened with death.

On or about March 1995, Abramo and Gurian opened a brokerage account at Pacific International Securities in Vancouver, Canada, for Umbiquity Holdings (a/k/a/ Ubiquity Holdings.) Cartwright and Obie Pindling signed the account-opening documents.

Around February 1996, Jean Claude Hauchecorne, an account executive with Pacific International, received an authorization from Cartwright to wire $1.7 million dollars from the Umbiquity account at PIS, to an account in Hong Kong. The mob said Cartwright was stealing the money from them.

The indictment alleges that Gurian ordered Hauchecorne to return the $1.7 million from Hong Kong. Around May 1996, Abramo , using the name Lou Metzer, asked for a meeting with Hauchecorne in New York at the Drake Hotel.

He was in fact met by Abramo, Gurian and Consalvo who were reportedly armed with "handguns and a baseball bat." They told the account executive that the $1.7 million transferred to Hong Kong was Abramo's and "that he could kill Jean Claude Hauchecorne if the money was not returned." The indictment stated that Gurian and Consalvo "assured Hauchecorne that he would be killed if the money was not returned."

In June 1996, Joy Cartwright was "murdered in her sleep with two gunshot wounds to the back of her head."

Fresco had previously expressed sympathy for Gurian, when he told WND that the stockbroker had unfairly had a large sum of money stolen from him by untrustworthy individuals.

The hotel death-threat episode with Gurian and Abramo was later recounted in a dramatic Canadian courtroom scene, where Vancouver-based Pacific International was accused of having turned a blind eye to their many mafia and criminal clients who were engaged in widespread money laundering. The "unsavory characters" mentioned included Gurian and Abramo who were identified as "New York Mafia."

Jean Claude Hauchecorne was banned for life in 1998 for servicing "New York Mafia clients" Phil Abramo and Phil Gurian. The two-year investigation of Pacific conducted buy the Royal Canadian Police and the resultant hearings are believed to be the most comprehensive probe conducted into any brokerage in Canada in recent history.

After the Cartwright murder, the alleged killer, Ashley Newbold, fled the island but was recently returned.

Six years after the crime, the murder trial is just now underway in the Bahamas.

On March 3, an offshore source told WND in an e-mail, "the Bahamas police want to prosecute Obie Pindling for his alleged role in the murder of Joy Cartwright and the politicians will not let them apparently."

Three days later, Pindling was accused on the witness stand of being the trigger man.

According to the recent testimony, on the night of the murder Obie Pindling and Ashley Newbold were waiting for Cartwright to return home around 3:30 or 4:00 a.m. from her job as manager of the 601 nightclub.

An investigation is ongoing.

Death threat

The sealed indictment also refers to a Joseph L. Lents who the defendants obtained stock from. Lents, a resident of Boca Raton, was formerly CEO of Investco Inc., and was accused by the SEC of running a pump and dump in another litigation.

Fresco told WND that he and Gurian were sources for Dow Jones reporter Remond for a previous article outing Investco. Remond followed it up with a negative piece on Gurian, which Fresco called "unfair": "She used his [Gurian's] work and experience with some of these dudes to make a story about him."

The sealed indictment alleges Gurian had previously made a death threat against Lents. In 1999, the indictment alleges Gurian "advised [Lents] that if he told the truth to Special Agents of the FBI [he] would end up like Joy Cartwright."

As for money alleged to have been stolen during the conspiracy, recent testimony in the Cartwright case raised new mysteries, namely the identity of one Samuel "Ninety" Knowles.

Accused murderer Ashley Newbold testified that one day in the western portion of the island, he and Obie met with a man known as Samuel "Ninety" Knowles who asked Obie what he was going to do about the "money" Joyanne [Joy] had stolen from him. He said Obie told "Ninety" he was going to "deal with Joyanne."

In January 2002, Gurian pleaded guilty to counts one and two of the indictment, which includes mail fraud, wire fraud and securities fraud. Gurian also agreed to cooperate fully in the investigation and prosecution of other persons in connection with charges in the case. A forfeiture of assets agreement including $7.5 million dollars and Gurian's Boca Raton home was later struck and amended.

The '2 Phils'

The 1997 Business Week article on "The Mob on Wall Street" indicated law enforcement believed Abramo and Gurian were so closely connected that they referred to them as the "two Phils."

This isn't the only litigation naming the "two Phils." Gurian was also named as a co-conspirator in another indictment handed down in the middle court of Florida.

In addition, Gurian was accused of having participated in a manipulative bear raid that caused the collapse of the Hanover Sterling brokerage. The Fiero Brothers of Pembroke Pines, Fla., were also named as key players in the Mafia-linked collapse.

Rounding up the real 'Sopranos'

A year following the Florida indictment, the U.S. Attorney's office in New York announced the unsealing of a 12-count indictment filed in Manhattan federal court charging 12 defendants, including virtually the entire ruling hierarchy of the DeCavalcante organized crime family of La Cosa Nostra, with wide-ranging racketeering and other charges relating to five murders, conspiracies to murder eight other individuals, securities fraud, loan sharking, gambling, extortion and obstruction of justice.

Included in the indictment are Phil Abramo and Louis (a/k/a/ LOUIE "EGGS") Consalvo. Both are named in multiple counts of murder, along with Franky Scarabino (a/k/a/ "Franky the Beast") and others. The murders included that of Frederick Weiss, editor for the Staten Island Advance, who was murdered to curry favor with John Gotti. Gotti feared Weiss, a former recycling executive, would testify against him in a trial regarding the mob's control of that business. Abramo wanted DeCavalcante to become a subsidiary of the Gambino family.

Among Abramo's alleged criminal activities were participation in three homicides, two conspiracies to murder, a conspiracy to commit securities fraud and loan sharking. Among Consalvo's alleged criminal activities were participation in a homicide, loan sharking, the operation of an illegal bookmaking business and a conspiracy to commit securities fraud.

In a bizarre twist, the indictment alleged that members of the mob also plotted to kill some of their co-defendants who were going to be named in the case. Barry W. Mawn, an assistant director in charge of the FBI's New York office, put it this way: "The brutality of the members and associates of the DeCavalcante family on display in this indictment belies the Hollywood notion of organized crime members as colorful rogues who beat the system."

FBI wiretaps revealed that theDeCavalcante gang thought of themselves as the mob that the hit-HBO series "The Sopranos" was based on.

The scientist and the ex-spook

Meanwhile, in the wake of the Dow Jones piece, HiEnergy affirms that it is entirely on the up and up, and that negative issues raised by the piece are completely irrelevant to the company, its technology, its financial position and its prospects.

Company management all said that the company plan was progressing well and moving forward. In an interview with WorldNetDaily, Yeffet, former head of the Israeli Secret Service, stated that he had personally viewed and tested HiEnergy's technology. He indicated that he was impressed, that the technology was light years beyond anything currently being used, and that he emphasized the company's need to decrease the detection speed time in order to attain full commercial viability.

HiEnergy Technologies boast proprietary rights to a neutron-based detection technology that it says can detect remotely and non-invasively such dangerous/illicit substances as explosives, liquid explosives, cocaine, anthrax and other biological and chemical threats. HiEnergy claims the technology then can display the exact chemical formulae of the contents of sealed containers.

The application the company jumped on was screening of baggage at airports and cargo containers. In addition, applications were seen in areas of customs law enforcement and mine detection.

When Yeffet was hired, he proclaimed he was going to create a "revolution" in aviation security. Some market watchers are getting tired of waiting for the "revolution" to happen, though. A cancelled public demonstration in September of last year gave some observers cold feet. HiEnergy Technologies' PR firm offered to fly a WND reporter out to California to see the technology first-hand in action, but added that they are currently "disassembling" their equipment and moving elsewhere, and don't know how long the disassembling will take, or where it's being moved. For that reason, no date was able to be set to see the technology. In addition, HiEnergy currently has no accelerator for its "SuperSenzor" and is experiencing unexplained delays in obtaining one from a Colorado firm.

Cash-poor HiEnergy ponies up a cool $20,000 a month to retain Yeffet as a consultant and to push HiEnergy in media, government and other circles. Sources told WND they wondered why, when Yeffet was being paid such a high sum, he didn't mention HiEnergy at any of his university speeches.

WND asked Yeffet whether he does mention HiEnergy at these speeches. He replied, "I just did for the first time," adding that now he was "comfortable discussing the technology." Yeffet came on board as a HiEnergy consultant in July of 2002.

An investor told WorldNetDaily that the fact Yeffet was still working with HiEnergy was proof it was a legitimate company. "It's not like Yeffet's saying, 'Shalom,' I’m out of here. I don't want to hear any more b---s--- about Gurian. Although I guess he could say, 'For 20 grand a month, sure I'll be a consultant.'"

Yeffet told WND that HiEnergy would be ready for an impressive public demonstration at the end of March or beginning of April, and that detection times were down to "seconds."

HiEnergy's other heavy hitter is physicist Dr. Bogdan Maglich, who formed the company in 1995.

Maglich, HiEnergy's chairman and chief scientist, is described by the company as having received numerous awards and recognition for his work on subatomic particles, including a White House citation by President John F. Kennedy for his work on the discovery of the omega meson during World War II.

Maglich has also done work on aneutronic fusion (MIGMA), a process described as nuclear power that cannot be used to create a weapon.

HiEnergy's PR firm provided the names of three individuals it said could vouch for the technology. Those were Dr. Robert Macek, director of the Proton Ring Laboratory at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Dr. Giovanni Fazio, professor of astrophysics at Harvard University, and Kevin Bell of U.S. Customs. WND contacted all three, but did not hear back from any by publication time.

To settle any potential questions, WND asked HiEnergy to provide copies of the DoD contracts referred to in press releases, and independent verification of its testing claims. At the time of publication of this report, WND has not yet received the requested information, but will report on it once received.

The controversy arising from the Dow Jones article may not be the only one mentioned in connection with HiEnergy's name. A former president of HiEnergy also is a colorful addition to the HiEnergy story.

Former HiEnergy president and UFOs

David Sereda, formerly president of HiEnergy when it was a private company and known as HiEnergy Microdevices, reportedly had a close encounter with a UFO that subsequently disappeared into "another dimension."

Sereda later said he had a close encounter of a mystical sort – he claims he had three face-to-face meetings with Jesus Christ. A tell-all followed, on Sereda's purported direct pipeline to the Most High.

When not experiencing such episodes, the ever-busy and eco-friendly Sereda has purportedly planted 1 million trees, wrote a book and video with a forward by Hollywood actor Dan Akroyd, and appeared on Shirley MacLaine's Web page. Sereda also claims to understand the propulsion methods and physics behind UFOs.

In addition, Sereda has accused the media of being controlled by the "Anti-Christ." That happened to be in relation to a lawsuit Sereda was involved with that targeted InVision Technologies. HiEnergy Technologies is competing for InVision's business.

WND asked Barry Alter about Sereda. "I've heard that name David Sereda but I don't know who he is," Alter answered.

Fresco had previously told WND that he and Gurian both had short-sold shares of InVision heavily and were hurting for it. Shoenfeld now allegedly lives in an efficiency in Hollywood, Fla. For the past year, he has repeatedly tried to persuade media, including WND, to write a story about alleged mob ties to InVision, in the hopes that such a story would cause InVision stock to drop, enabling Gurian and Shoenfeld to recoup some of their losses.

The 'weasel'

A reliable law enforcement source, aware of Schoenfeld's connection to Gurian, characterized him as a "weasel" who "talks too much and writes way too many e-mails."

The day the Remond article was published, Schoenfeld was contacted by a well-known aviation security expert. The expert, who has appeared on Fox, MSNBC and other news shows, asked Shoenfeld whether he knew Gurian, or had ever met him.

Schoenfeld denied in an e-mail that he had ever met Gurian. He subsequently admitted to WND that he had lied to the expert, saying "How could I tell him?"

Schoenfeld had previously spent much time trying to convince the publicly known media figure of the merits of HiEnergy and its possible solutions to unsolved problems encountered by InVision Technologies.

'Cleerhead' and 'Realityman3'

In an effort to convince WND that Remond was an unfair journalist, Schoenfeld (Fresco) sent irrelevant e-mails characterizing her as "overweight," "French," "rude" and a "member of a motorcycle club."

Fresco posts anonymously on the Raging Bull financial boards under the names "cleerhead" and "realityman3." Although Fresco currently is complaining about Remond, his "Cleerhead" posts indicate he may have been pumping Remond's article before it came out, to profit off of short-selling HiEnergy shares.

Perhaps the current saga surrounding some of the colorful individuals formerly connected to HiEnergy or hovering around the edges of the company can best be summed up in the words of the FBI wiretap of the DeCavalcante figures. The figures were overheard commenting on the hit HBO show, "The Sopranos."

"Great characters! Great acting!" they exclaimed.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherrie Gossett is a Florida-based researcher and writer, formerly with the South Florida Sun-Sentinel, and a contributing reporter to WorldNetDaily.



To: DanZ who wrote (4415)5/19/2003 6:06:19 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 5582
 
'Cleerhead' and 'Realityman3'

In an effort to convince WND that Remond was an unfair journalist, Schoenfeld (Fresco) sent irrelevant e-mails characterizing her as "overweight," "French," "rude" and a "member of a motorcycle club."

Fresco posts anonymously on the Raging Bull financial boards under the names "cleerhead" and "realityman3." Although Fresco currently is complaining about Remond, his "Cleerhead" posts indicate he may have been pumping Remond's article before it came out, to profit off of short-selling HiEnergy shares.

Perhaps the current saga surrounding some of the colorful individuals formerly connected to HiEnergy or hovering around the edges of the company can best be summed up in the words of the FBI wiretap of the DeCavalcante figures. The figures were overheard commenting on the hit HBO show, "The Sopranos."

"Great characters! Great acting!" they exclaimed.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherrie Gossett is a Florida-based researcher and writer, formerly with the South Florida Sun-Sentinel, and a contributing reporter to WorldNetDaily.



To: DanZ who wrote (4415)5/19/2003 6:23:15 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 5582
 
"In the spring of 1996, Jean Claude Hauchecorne, one of the top revenue producers at Pacific International, was summoned to New York by two of his biggest clients. They met in a hotel room and what happened there was shocking. The two clients, Phil Abramo and Phil Gurian, entered the room with two other men. These men were armed. Gurian and Abramo accused Hauchecorne of stealing $1.7-million. They threatened to kill him if the money wasn't returned. Hauchecorne was quite rightly scared for his life. Abramo and Gurian were apparently high-ranking members of the Mafia," stated Mr. Angus in his opening. (All figures, like most of P.I.'s numerous dubious client accounts, are in U.S. dollars.)

Mr. Hauchecorne returned to Canada, waited a few weeks while he tried to resolve his pickle with his offshore-account Mafia clients, and then told his boss Mr. Meier about the hotel room encounter.

"At this point you might have expected Mr. Meier, the president and CEO of a brokerage firm, to stop and wonder how one of his top brokers could be involved with the Mafia and to do all he could to root it out and stop it. (BCSC) Staff would have expected Mr. Meier to order a firm-wide investigation immediately of the situation to determine if any other similar non-resident accounts were linked to persons with unsavoury backgrounds," Mr. Angus told the hearing.

Instead, no one at P.I. did anything to beef up compliance until much later. "No one thought to look into other similar non-resident accounts to check the background of the people P.I. was dealing with, or the activity which was going on in the accounts. If they bothered to look, they would have discovered that many of their clients were criminals and that they appeared to be laundering money through accounts at P.I.," Mr. Angus told the panel.

rgm.com



To: DanZ who wrote (4415)5/19/2003 6:27:34 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 5582
 
On May 25, 1996, Hauchecorne learned who some of them were. While he was staying at the upscale Drake hotel in Manhattan, four men burst into his room and accosted him. One was a client he knew by name as Louis Metzer, although the two had never personally met. When “Metzer,” whom he described as a “big muscular guy,” burst into the room, Hauchecorne recognized him from a BusinessWeek photo as Philip Abramo, a high-ranking member of the Mafia. With Abramo was Philip Gurian, another mob-connected figure who placed dozens of orders with Hauchecorne to buy and sell US stocks, many of which had been identified by BusinessWeek as mob-manipulated stocks. Hauchecorne described the other two as “little Italian-looking guys” who served as hit men. One had a gun in his belt and the other was brandishing a steel bar. They demanded that Hauchecorne return $1.75 million he had transferred to Switzerland on the instructions of another Mafia operative, Eric Wynn, who had had a falling out with Abramo and Gurian. Otherwise, they would kill him. “I was scared shitless,” the baby-faced broker admitted. “I do a lot of sport stuff, bungee jumping and #### like this, and I have enjoyed that. But this is the first time where I knew, this is it, you’re lucky if you walk out of here.”

Later, in a more civil attempt to recover the funds, Gurian filed a statement of claim in Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench. The matter was eventually settled out of court, but it came to the attention of officials working for the Vancouver Stock Exchange, who cited Hauchecorne for failing to learn “the essential facts” of the accounts he was operating. In June 1999, a VSE hearing panel ruled the Pacific International broker had failed to make necessary inquiries to determine whom he was dealing with. Noting that Hauchecorne had worked in the investment business for 10 years, the panel concluded “he was sufficiently experienced to know that offshore companies could be used for illegal activities.” The panel suspended his broker’s licence for life, fined him $200,000, ordered him to disgorge $95,000 in illicit commissions and pay investigation and hearing costs. In assessing these penalties, the panel said there was no question that Hauchecorne’s misconduct deserved serious sanctions, but noted there were no similar precedents to serve as guidelines. “This case seems to us to be a unique one and stands alone,” it noted.

===================================
Troubled waters

Pacific International is under the microscope of the BC Securities Commission, which alleges some of its officers and directors turned a blind eye to mob-related transactions

Vancouver stockbroker Jean Claude Hauchecorne, who worked at Pacific International Securities Inc. until mid-1999, had a charming personality, and his boyish looks made him the picture of innocence. As one colleague said, “You would never suspect him of doing anything wrong. He had a good sense of humor; it was hard not to get along with him.”

Hauchecorne was, however, a risk taker. He liked flying small planes and was an avid hang glider and bungee jumper. But even more dangerously, he didn’t care whom he dealt with. Born in Switzerland and fluent in four languages, the 41-year-old broker worked as a functionary in the classic Swiss tradition. He didn’t try to analyze stocks, and rarely recommended them. He was simply an order taker, who bought and sold on clients’ instructions. He didn’t always know who his clients were, nor did he bother to find out. He didn’t think it was his business or duty.

On May 25, 1996, Hauchecorne learned who some of them were. While he was staying at the upscale Drake hotel in Manhattan, four men burst into his room and accosted him. One was a client he knew by name as Louis Metzer, although the two had never personally met. When “Metzer,” whom he described as a “big muscular guy,” burst into the room, Hauchecorne recognized him from a BusinessWeek photo as Philip Abramo, a high-ranking member of the Mafia. With Abramo was Philip Gurian, another mob-connected figure who placed dozens of orders with Hauchecorne to buy and sell US stocks, many of which had been identified by BusinessWeek as mob-manipulated stocks. Hauchecorne described the other two as “little Italian-looking guys” who served as hit men. One had a gun in his belt and the other was brandishing a steel bar. They demanded that Hauchecorne return $1.75 million he had transferred to Switzerland on the instructions of another Mafia operative, Eric Wynn, who had had a falling out with Abramo and Gurian. Otherwise, they would kill him. “I was scared shitless,” the baby-faced broker admitted. “I do a lot of sport stuff, bungee jumping and #### like this, and I have enjoyed that. But this is the first time where I knew, this is it, you’re lucky if you walk out of here.”

Later, in a more civil attempt to recover the funds, Gurian filed a statement of claim in Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench. The matter was eventually settled out of court, but it came to the attention of officials working for the Vancouver Stock Exchange, who cited Hauchecorne for failing to learn “the essential facts” of the accounts he was operating. In June 1999, a VSE hearing panel ruled the Pacific International broker had failed to make necessary inquiries to determine whom he was dealing with. Noting that Hauchecorne had worked in the investment business for 10 years, the panel concluded “he was sufficiently experienced to know that offshore companies could be used for illegal activities.” The panel suspended his broker’s licence for life, fined him $200,000, ordered him to disgorge $95,000 in illicit commissions and pay investigation and hearing costs. In assessing these penalties, the panel said there was no question that Hauchecorne’s misconduct deserved serious sanctions, but noted there were no similar precedents to serve as guidelines. “This case seems to us to be a unique one and stands alone,” it noted.

If the case did stand alone, it wouldn’t for long. In succeeding months, US authorities filed numerous complaints alleging that Pacific International accounts were being used as turnstiles for money-laundering activities and illicit stock activities in the US and offshore. In fact, the cases became so numerous that BC Securities Commission (BCSC) investigators began to look beyond Pacific International’s rank-and-file brokers to the people who were running the firm. That investigation culminated on July 10, 2001, when BCSC executive director Stephen Wilson issued a notice of hearing alleging that nine of Pacific International’s senior officers and directors had turned a blind eye to mob-related share dealings and money-laundering activities.

The notice cited the Hauchecorne case and named 14 other men “with criminal or regulatory histories” who had controlled, operated or were associated with accounts at Pacific International. It also referred to numerous indictments and complaints filed by the US Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that had cited instances where illicit transactions had occurred in Pacific International accounts. All these cases, the commission contended, should have prompted the firm to conduct internal reviews and “address the compliance deficiencies which those reviews should have revealed.”

The list of respondents reads like a who’s who of Howe Street. Among them:

Pacific International chairman and founder Max Meier, a 55-year-old Swiss native who served as a member of the VSE board of governors for 10 years, including a stint as vice-chairman from 1994 to 1997.

* Cofounder and vice-chairman John Eymann, who served as a member of the BCSC policy advisory committee, is a member of the Canadian Securities Institute’s ethics committee and a member of numerous VSE disciplinary panels.

* Former Pacific International chairman and director Marty Reynolds, a former Nesbitt Burns executive who served as VSE chairman from 1989 to 1991.

* Compliance head Larry McQuid, a former RCMP commercial crime officer and ex-VSE compliance manager who served on the VSE board of governors for several years.

* President and COO Jean-Paul Bachellerie, a BC chartered accountant.

But there was a much bigger fish caught in the commission’s net: Germain Carriؘ, president and COO of National Bank Financial Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of National Bank of Canada. Several years earlier, National Bank Financial had acquired a 35% stake in Pacific International and Carriؘ had joined the board to keep an eye on the bank’s investment. Now he found himself the subject of securities commission action. “We have named all the directors because they bear the ultimate responsibility for what happens at the firm,” Sasha Angus, BCSC director of enforcement, told reporters.

On Sept. 6, Carriؘ settled the allegations against him by admitting he had become aware of “certain deficiencies” in Pacific International’s compliance procedures, and some of the trading that had occurred had “harmed the reputation of the capital markets in British Columbia.” He agreed to pay a $1,000 penalty and $4,000 in investigation costs. (The settlement acknowledges Carriؘ had been a director only since May 1998, after most of the offending transactions had occurred, and that in June 1999 the firm, under his leadership, began a major effort to clean up its compliance procedures.)

The remaining respondents have been ordered to appear before a commission tribunal on Oct. 7 for a hearing that is expected to take months. If found to have failed to live up to their duties, they could be exiled from the market, fined up to $100,000 each and ordered to pay costs. “What we are trying to address is the necessity of proper compliance procedures not only being in place but also being followed,” said Angus. “You must know who your client is and why they are at your firm and what they are doing at your firm.” John Woods, editor of Canada Stockwatch, a Vancouver-based stock market information service, had a blunter description of what the notice was all about: “They are accusing the heart of the Howe Street brokerage fraternity of governing in the spirit of the three monkeys.”

This wasn’t the first time Pacific International had come to the attention of regulators. Over the years, the firm’s brokers had been involved in myriad misdealings. In July 1999—a month after Hauche-corne was exiled from Howe Street— The Vancouver Sun conducted a review of disciplinary actions the VSE had taken against the 18 securities firms under its audit jurisdiction. It found that, from January 1995 until then, Pacific International had amassed a league-leading $999,200 in fines and costs, and its brokers had been hit with a total of 75 years in suspensions, second only to Georgia Pacific Securities, another small Howe Street brokerage firm. (For the purpose of the study, Hauchecorne’s lifetime suspension counted for only 25 years.) Most of these actions stemmed from dealings in the US penny stock market, which had become Pacific International’s bread and butter after Michael Johnston was appointed VSE president in 1995 and drove most of the scurrilous promoters south to the loosely regulated OTC Bulletin Board. According to the BCSC, in 1993 the firm derived $2.3 million, or 14% of its commission revenue, from stocks traded or quoted in the US. By 1999, that figure had jumped to $19.2 million, or 67% of overall commission revenue. Of this amount, 82% was gener- ated by 15 of Pacific International’s 85 brokers, and 80% came from non-resident accounts. Meier made no secret of his firm’s predilection for risky business. “We go where our clients want to go and obviously in the last few years a lot of clients have gone to the Alberta Stock Exchange, Canadian Dealing Network and bulletin board,” he said in an interview in January 1999 (before the VSE merged with the ASE and CDN to form the Canadian Venture Exchange). “We don’t recommend stocks in those markets, but there seems to be a lot of people who want to be involved in them.”

Despite recurring regulatory problems, Pacific International had managed to remain a VSE member in good standing. Indeed, the firm’s status was high enough that in May 1998, Montreal-based LúBsque Beaubien Geoffrion Inc. acquired a 35% interest in it. At the time, LúBsque was 75% owned by National Bank Financial Ltd., which, in turn, was wholly owned by the National Bank of Canada, also based in Montreal. That meant National Bank had a 26% indirect interest in Pacific International. In August 1999, LúBsque acquired First Marathon Securities and renamed the merged entity National Bank Financial. At the same time, National Bank acquired the remaining 25% of LúBsque, increasing its interest in Pacific International to 35%.

The combined LúBsque/First Marathon operations, with 2,700 employees in 86 of-fices across the country, are now operating as National Bank Financial. Pacific International, with 155 employees in three offices in Vancouver, Victoria and Calgary, continues to operate separately under its own name. In Vancouver, both firms are located in the prestigious Park Place building on Burrard Street, albeit on different floors. Pacific International, however, proved to be one of the bank’s less prestigious affiliates. After the Hauchecorne incident, there was a flood of other cases citing Pacific International as a conduit for illicit activities. One in particular would capture headlines across the country.

The basic modus operandi of stock manipulators is to acquire big blocks of cheap shares in a shell company, stash the shares in offshore accounts, issue false information on the company’s commercial prospects, bribe brokers and newsletter writers to recommend the stock to their clients, then dump shares onto unsuspecting investors and run away with the cash. Woods of Stockwatch says Vancouver brokerage firms are favorite places to stash stock because their employees “wake up in the morning, put their noses into the air, smell manure and head straight to it.” As he sees it, the brokers are happy to take the business because it is easy and lucrative. “All you are is an order taker,” he says. “The commissions to the broker and the member firms are absolutely mind-boggling.” But he notes that some of the order takers have made a critical mistake. “They think because Vancouver brokerage firms are offshore, US authorities can’t get to the bottom of them. Well, oops.”

On June 29, 1999, Pacific International brokers Michael Patterson and Dirk Rachfall crossed the US border at Blaine, Wash., just south of Vancouver, and drove to a restaurant near the Sea-Tac International Airport outside Seattle. There they met a client, David Hogue of New York, with whom they were ostensibly going to play a game of golf. They never got to hit any balls, though. As the brokers were chatting, several FBI agents burst onto the scene and arrested Patterson and Rachfall. Hogue was not arrested. He was, in fact, working with the feds. It had been a setup.

According to a complaint filed days earlier by an FBI agent in New York, Hogue had routinely bribed brokers to sell stocks to the public on the basis of false and misleading statements. One of the stocks was Orlando Supercard Inc., an OTC Bulletin Board stock that, according to the US Justice Department, was being manipulated through Hogue’s accounts at Pacific International by members of the New York-based Colombo crime family and a Russian organized crime group called Bor. By August 1997, however, the scheme had collapsed, leaving Patterson and Rachfall with a $300,000 debit for which they were personally responsible. To correct the debit, the brokers enlisted Hogue to help them corral the company’s shares, artificially inflate the share price and deal them off to the public. Unfortunately for the brokers, Hogue was caught and pleaded guilty to stock manipulation. In return for leniency, he agreed to become a co-operating witness. After their arrest, Rachfall and Patterson were placed in custody and indicted by a US federal grand jury in New York. Pacific International was not accused of any wrongdoing. Within several days, Rachfall was released on US$300,000 cash bail and Patterson on US$350,000 cash and property bail. Of those amounts, Pacific International kicked in $50,000 each from monies that they had available to them within their firm. “We did that out of compassion for their wives and children,” explained McQuid, the firm’s compliance officer.

In April 2000, the brokers pleaded guilty to one count of securities fraud in the US and were imprisoned for five months and fined US$130,000 each. Then they returned to Vancouver.

In July 1999, days after the Rachfall and Patterson case hit the news, Pacific International was broadsided by another indictment, this one filed in US District Court in New Jersey. A US Justice Department attorney alleged that promoter Philippe Hababou, who had been a fugitive from French justice since the mid-1990s, and several of his nominees acquired control of another OTC-listed company, Prime International Products, then arranged for the company to issue large blocks of stock to offshore companies that they also controlled. Some of this stock was allegedly deposited into accounts at Pacific International in the names of Hababou and several nominees, enabling them to control about two million free-trading shares without any disclosure to US regulators or prospective investors. They then made false statements about the company to induce investors to bid up the stock, enabling them to sell US$5.3 million worth. Of this amount, Hababou allegedly transferred US$2.2 million to accounts at Citibank in New York and US$580,000 to an account in his name at Caesar’s Atlantic City Casino in New Jersey. Although Pacific International was allegedly used as a conduit, there were no allegations of misconduct against the firm.

Hababou’s broker at Pacific International was Donald Bruce Stratton. He had worked at the firm since 1987, but had taken a leave of absence on May 26—just three weeks before Hababou was indicted for alleged stock manipulation and money-laundering. McQuid said Stratton was on a cross-country motor tour of Canada and was due back within three months. The indictment threw BCSC’s Angus into a high state of excitement. “This is a great concern for our market,” he said, convinced he was dealing with something more than a few errant accounts.

Even more concerned was his new boss, Stephen Wilson, former head of Hong Kong Bank of Canada’s mutual fund arm. Wilson had taken office as executive director of the BC Securities Commission in July 1999, and had been watching the parade of crooks that had been passing through Pacific International. In September 1999, during his inaugural interview with The Vancouver Sun, he made it clear that he was looking for a new ethical standard on Howe Street. Wilson said he wanted to change the mindset of “extreme entrepreneurialism” that pervaded the securities industry. “The profit motive is so strong it places the compliance motive into a distant second place,” he declared. “I want them [brokers and other registrants] to think about operating in a compliant way, rather than just a cost of doing business. Compliance is not a function, it’s a state of mind. Either the firm, from top to bottom, behaves in a compliant way or it doesn’t.” Wilson said brokerage firms must take more responsibility for the actions of their employees. “If a broker screws up, the broker gets shotgunned and the firm carries on,” he noted. “I find that extraordinary.”

But it wasn’t. For years, many of Howe Street’s more dubious brokerage firms had been able to survive repeated scandals by tossing their brokers onto the regulatory altar. The VSE and its successor, the Canadian Venture Exchange (now the TSX Venture Exchange), had routinely suspended and fined rank-and-file brokers, but rarely penetrated the paneled boardrooms of the firms themselves. Making it clear that his comments were not philosophical musings, Wilson referred specifically to Pacific International, but added that the commission was not restricting inquiries to that firm. “We are also investigating the broader implications of the Pacific International affair,” he said.

Meanwhile, Pacific International was shifting into full damage control. On July 7, just as the Hababou case was surfacing, the brokerage issued a release noting that the indictment contained no allegation of wrongdoing against the firm or any of its employees. Furthermore, the release said, the indictment named not only Pacific International as an intermediary for illicit transactions, but also a “sizeable brokerage firm” and a New York bank. “Our compliance checks exceed industry requirements,” the release quoted McQuid as saying. “Nonetheless, we have launched a complete and independent review of all our compliance measures.”

Three days later, Pacific International announced it had hired a high-powered independent team to review its compliance procedures. The team consisted of Mark Skwarok, former chief counsel for the BC Securities Commission, Dean Holley, former executive director of the commission, and Norman Inkster, former RCMP commissioner and now president of KPMG Investigation and Security Inc. “We are obviously concerned about these incidences and the perceptions they leave with the investing public and securities regulators,” said Pacific International chairman Meier.

The following month, the firm an-nounced “bold new compliance initiatives” to reduce the possibility of it being used by US clients as a conduit for illegal purposes. According to Pacific International, it had already established “some of the most stringent account opening and identity verification procedures in the industry.” Henceforth it would not allow US residents to open accounts, or permit share certificates of companies quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board to be deposited into client accounts, or allow non-resident clients to transfer funds or securities to third parties. “Our goal is simple,” said Meier. “We want to minimize the risk that our firm could be used in the future as a conduit for questionable activities.” After Rachfall and Patterson returned to Vancouver, Wilson hauled them before a commission hearing panel. He wanted them banned from the stock market for the next 20 years, fined $50,000 each and assessed costs. However, the tribunal had different thoughts. “Considering the consequences that Rachfall and Patterson have suffered as a result of their conduct, it is unlikely they would pose a threat to the market were they to rejoin the securities industry,” the panel decided. “If anything, their experiences should make them unusually vigilant.” Woods of Canada Stockwatch thought the panel’s reasoning was “ridiculous.” Referring to the pair’s efforts to resolve their debit problem, he suggested they had “already demonstrated they will do anything to get out of a jam. They are convicted crooks. The very idea that a convicted crook is a rehabilitated crook is ludicrous.” Wilson wasn’t too thrilled with the verdict, either. “I’d be lying if I didn’t say I was disappointed with the gap between what we were asking for and what we were given,” he said. Throughout 2000 and 2001, US authorities issued more indictments and complaints against promoters who used Pacific International as a vehicle for their alleged frauds. By July 10, 2001, when the commission issued its notice of hearing, it was able to name 14 people with regulatory histories who directly or indirectly ran accounts there. The most serious offender was Shalom Weiss, who was indicted in Orlando, Fla., in April 1998 on racketeering and money-laundering charges. The following year, he was convicted and sentenced to 845 years in jail and ordered to pay more than US$100 million in restitution to his victims. Meier insists that nobody at Pacific International had any idea Weiss was involved in any accounts at the firm. In fact, he says they never heard of him until a year or so after the account was closed. More generally, Meier says that any suggestion the firm’s directors did not meet their corporate governance responsibilities is “unwarranted and unfair, particularly to those directors who did not have direct compliance responsibilities.” Indeed, it is clear from the lineup of lawyers that Meier and his fellow directors place themselves in a different category than McQuid, who had direct-line responsibility for compliance. (The directors are represented by well-known Vancouver securities lawyer Don Sorochan. McQuid has separate counsel, Skwarok.) Whether McQuid becomes the sacrificial lamb, or Wilson succeeds in establishing a new standard of corporate governance on Howe Street, remains to be seen.



To: DanZ who wrote (4415)5/19/2003 7:39:49 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 5582
 
'Phil has a PR problem'

Fresco had told WND prior to the interview, "Phil has a PR problem." WND questioned Fresco prior to the interview, during which time Fresco admitted that years ago he had been called in by the FBI, who several years ago were questioning all of Gurian's friends. He added, in a rambling conversation, "He's never threatened me. He would never threaten a life-long friend." He added that Gurian had done "some bad things," that he himself "had gotten involved," and added, "I've always done very well with Phil," alluding to stock deals the two had been involved in. An unnamed source told WND, "Hal's running scared."

Schoenfeld invited WND to investigate the matter, saying, ironically, "I realize your article may turn out to be worse than Remond's."

Gurian told WND he simply had become involved in the sales of "Reg" S securities, and mentioned a "conspiracy" on the part of the SEC to go after the "little guys." He said that he erred in that he knew the companies whose stock he was purchasing were engaged in fraud. Gurian said at the time he rationalized that since he wasn't engaged in fraud, it was OK. He acknowledged that his prior activities were wrong, but complained that he was not engaged currently in any wrongdoing, and for that reason thought the Dow Jones article unfair. Gurian added that he was involved in a number of good works, which he kept private.

Arrested in Switzerland after an arrest warrant was issued in the U.S., Gurian now awaits sentencing. During the interview, he voiced concerns that the Remond article may influence a judge and affect his sentencing.

He also flatly denied that he had anything to do with HiEnergy Technologies. Former HiEnergy CEO Barry Alter was a friend of his, he said, and that was the sole connection. Alter confirmed to WND that the two were friends. "Oh God, I met him many, many years ago down in Florida. We played golf together," he said.

Gurian also said that he had never seen HiEnergy's technology, and had no personal knowledge of it. As for Rheal Cote, Gurian pal Schoenfeld identified him as the French boyfriend of Gurian's mother, Jeanine Gurian.

Gurian's statements contradicted those of "lifetime friend" Schoenfeld, who had previously told WND that Gurian "handled" the HiEnergy IPO and was busy behind the scenes raising money for the company. At that time, Shoenfeld had described Gurian to WND as a "very successful guy who manages the assets of others and his own assets. He's a professional stock trader. He does very well."

The National Association of Securities Dealers permanently barred Gurian from the securities business in March 1995.

WND asked Gurian, in Schoenfeld's presence, about the seeming discrepancy in comments. Gurian responded by saying he had given contacts to Alter, but did not want to say that previously, because "it would kill me." In a taped interview with WND, HiEnergy's former CEO confirmed that Gurian had passed on investor contacts to him. "They were just people who we both knew … who I contacted to see if they wanted to invest in the company. That's all." Alter declined to name any of the investors, saying the information was "private." Alter said, "I raised them [HiEnergy Technologies] a bunch of money."

Gurian's statement that he had never verified the existence of HiEnergy's neutron detection system raises more questions. Gurian is the control man behind WallStreetSpin.com, managing and writing for the site. Months ago, Gurian produced a bullish report on HiEnergy which was recommended to the investing public by former CEO Alter in a HiEnergy press release.

During the interview, Gurian indicated that all the preliminary research into HiEnergy, prior to the reverse merger with SLW Enterprises, was done by Greg Gilbert, currently a director for HiEnergy. Gilbert is also CEO and president of Hamilton-Biophile Companies, formed by merging Hamilton-Clarke and the remains of Mehl/Biophile following the removal of all Mehl management.



To: DanZ who wrote (4415)5/19/2003 8:22:43 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 5582
 
NASD Registered Person: BRADLEY ALLEN FAY
CRD Number: 1784060

********************************************************************************
CURRENT EMPLOYMENT
********************************************************************************

**************** CURRENT EMPLOYMENT (1 of 1) ****************


Employing Firm: GUNNALLEN FINANCIAL, INC

Firm CRD Number: 17609
Office of Employment address: 1715 N. WESTSHORE BLVD.
7TH FLOOR
TAMPA, FL 33607
USA
Start Date: 02/25/1997 End Date: to present


*************** PREVIOUS EMPLOYMENT (2 of 2) ***************

Employing Firm: CHATFIELD DEAN & CO., INC.

Firm CRD Number:
Office of Employment address: TAMPA, FL
Start Date: 10/1990 End Date: 07/1995



NASD Public Disclosure Program May 19, 2003 Page 4
This information is current as of: 05/19/2003
________________________________________________________________________________
NASD Registered Person: BRADLEY ALLEN FAY
CRD Number: 1784060

********************************************************************************
INVESTIGATIONS
********************************************************************************

********** INVESTIGATION (1 of 1) **********


Reporting Source: Broker (Form U-4)

Date Reported: 01/24/2003

Initiated By: NASD

Notice Date: 01/17/2003

Details: THE NASD HAS NOTIFIED THE FIRM, THAT FAY, AS THE FIRMS FINOP IN
CHARGE OF REGISTRATIONS ALLEGEDLY VIOLATED ART. V. SEC2 BY
FAILING TO UPDATE TWO U-4'S TO REFLECT THAT PREVIOUSLY
DISCLOSED CUSTOMER ARBITRATIONS HAS BEEN SUBSEQUENTLY SETTLED.


************ END OF REPORT ************



To: DanZ who wrote (4415)10/1/2003 9:47:20 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 5582
 
GUNNALLEN HAS THE SAME PHONE NUMBER AS SOVERIEGN OR ARE THEY ONE IN THE SAME? LOL

just do a google search on soveriegn's phone number google.com

SOURCE Sovereign Equity Management Corporation
-0- 1/31/97
/CONTACT: S. Matthew Totty, Chief Equity Analyst, Sovereign Equity
Management Corporation, 813-282-0808
/
(PPD)

==================================================

/CONTACT: S. Matthew Totty, Chief Equity Analyst, Sovereign Equity
Management Corporation, 813-282-0808/
(PPD)

SOVEREIGN EQUITY RAISES PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES TO STRONG BUY
1997-01-31 10:42 (New York)

BOCA RATON, Fla., Jan. 31 /PRNewswire/ -- The following was released by
Sovereign Equity Management:

Sovereign Equity Management Corporation is raising our rating on Pre-paid
Legal Services (AMEX: PDD)(16.50) to Strong Buy from BUY due to the tremendous
growth and demand for pre-paid legal insurance.
Pre-Paid Legal Services (PPD) recently reported record earnings and
revenues for the year-end 1996. Revenues for 1996 were $59.9M vs. $37.1M in
1995 (up 61%), while 1996 earnings surged to 56c per share compared to 34c per
share in 1995 (up 65% fully diluted). The production of new memberships rose
77% for 1996 and new sales associates rose 38%.
PPD enters their 25th year, they continue to benefit from our ever
increasing litigious society. Most Americans can not afford legal help, and
this is causing a change in the delivery of legal services. According to the
Maryland Bar Journal, recent studies have shown that the average middle-income
household in Maryland faces 1 legal problem per year. Out of these
households, 72% do not contact an attorney when they have a legal problem.
Pre-Paid Legal's insurance plan would allow many of these families to afford
the legal help they need and deserve. PPD is currently the only pre-paid
legal services company in the nation with a large marketing force. The market
potential is estimated at $15 to $25 billion.
The company launched their new fast start training program for 1997 that
should have a favorable impact on recruiting and membership sales. Several
large corporations such as Hardees Restaurants are offering Pre-Paid Legal's
insurance plan as a part of their employee benefits program. Sales by group
certified associates currently account for roughly 50% of sales and are
expected to grow to 60% of sales by year-end 1997.
The company currently has $17M in cash with no debt and generated almost
$1M in positive cash flow in Q4 1996 alone. We are continuing to see margin
improvements resulting from economies of scale and an increase in the average
yearly contract premiums from $165 per year in 1993, to $216 per year in 1996.
Clearly PPD has enough resources to continue to meet demand of this fantastic
growth. Much like HMOs, legal maintenance organizations or LMOs, seem to be
the wave of the future. If you do not have pre-paid legal insurance now,
it's probably only a matter of time before you will. How can America argue
with having an attorney on call for less than your cable TV bill?

We expect revenue and earnings' growth of 40% for 1997, raising earnings
per share to 80c from 56c in 1996. Because of the strong growth ahead, we
feel the stock is a great buy here and especially on any pullbacks.
Considering the estimated 40% growth rate, we feel the company can maintain a
P/E ratio of 3O+ which would give the stock a l2-month target of $24.00 -
$26.00.
This report is for information purposes only, and under no circumstances
is it a solicitation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. The
information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed by us to
be reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete.
Sovereign Equity Management Corp. may or may not maintain a position or make
a market in the securities listed herein, its employees and/or its officers
and directors, may from time to time have a long or short position in the
securities mentioned herein and may sell or buy such securities or related
options.
Sovereign Equity Management Corporation is a full service broker/dealer
serving retail and institutional clients with offices in Boca Raton, New York,
and Tampa.

SOURCE Sovereign Equity Management Corporation
-0- 1/31/97
/CONTACT: S. Matthew Totty, Chief Equity Analyst, Sovereign Equity
Management Corporation, 813-282-0808
/
(PPD)

CO: Sovereign Equity Management Corporation; Pre-Paid Legal Services
ST: Florida
IN: FIN
SU:

-0- (PRN) Jan/31/97 10:27
EOS (PRN) Jan/31/97 10:27 86

-0- (PRN) Jan/31/97 10:42

SOVEREIGN EQUITY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION UPGRADES
1995-12-26 15:20 (New York)

PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES TO STRONG BUY FROM BUY

BOCA RATON, Fla., Dec. 26 /PRNewswire/ -- Sovereign Equity
Management Corporation today issued the following statement:

We are upgrading our Pre-Paid Legal Services (AMEX: PPD) (9.68) BUY
recommendation to STRONG BUY due to increased contract sales, strong
projected earnings per share and favorable technical indicators.
For the cumulative 11 months, production of new memberships rose
199% to 99,406 from 41,599. PPD continues to increase contracts by
expanding into new states. PPD is a pioneer in an emerging growth
industry. Their industry today is in a position similar to that of
prepaid medical care approximately 30 years ago. It is PPD's
expectation that the prepaid legal services industry will develop over
the next few years much to the same degree as prepaid medical plans
have. As a pioneer and leader in the field, PPD is positioned to take
advantage of this emerging growth industry. Experts believe the market
for prepaid legal plans is between 100 to 140 million Americans. This
places the dollar size of the market somewhere between 15 and 25 billion
dollars. According to an American Bar Association survey of middle-
income households, it was found that at the time they were interviewed
52% of the households had at least one new or ongoing legal problem.
PPD is expected to grow earnings per share at 50% per year for the
next five years according to First Call. PPD's 1995 earnings rose from
$2.5 million to $5 million on 43% higher revenues with 64% more shares.
This is due primarily to increased contract sales and the elimination of
debt. Sales for the third quarter ending September, 1995 were a record
$9.8 million, that is a 53% increase over third quarter last year. With
lower interest expense and higher contract sales, earnings estimates for
1996 are $0.55, that's an estimated 57% over 1995 earnings of $0.35.
The new contract numbers for December are due out in the first week in
January which should confirm our expectation of growth. We expect Q495
earnings per share $0.10 versus $0.06 for Q494, a 67% increase. The
earnings are expected to be released on Jan. 29, 1996.
PPD has just broken out of a strong 3-month base into new ground
above $8.87, as the technical indicators were suggesting in my November
report. This confirms our belief that PPD is undervalued and under-
followed. The breakout volume was 293,300 which suggests strong
interest and confirms the advancement. PPD has good support around

$7.50, and should be accumulated under $10.00 as long as the stock does
not breakdown below $7.50 on heavy volume. We rate PPD a strong buy
with a 6-12 month target of $12-$13.
-0- 12/26/95
/CONTACT: S. Matthew Totty, Chief Equity Analyst, Sovereign Equity
Management Corporation, 813-282-0808/
(PPD)

CO: Pre-Paid Legal Services; Sovereign Equity Management Corporation
ST: Florida
IN: FIN
SU: RTG

-0- (PRN) Dec/26/95 15:05
EOS (PRN) Dec/26/95 15:05 86

-0- (PRN) Dec/26/95 15:20

Searched the web for 813-282-0808. Results 1 - 7 of about 13. Search took 0.08 seconds.


Gunnallen Financial Inc, (813) 282-0808, 1715 N West Shore Blvd, Tampa, FL 33607 Yahoo! Maps MapQuest


GunnAllen Financial, Inc. - Careers
... 842-1697 732-291-2613 Local 732-233-3543 Fax vameno@gunnallen.com, All Other Areas
Bradley A. Fay, Executive Vice President 800-713-4046 813-282-0808 Local 813 ...
www.gunnallen.com/careers.asp - 12k - Cached - Similar pages

GunnAllen Financial, Inc. - Current Openings
... you feel you could be an asset to GunnAllen Financial, please send your resume to:
Bradley A. Fay, Executive Vice President 800-713-4046 813-282-0808 Local 813 ...
www.gunnallen.com/ca_openings.asp - 9k - Cached - Similar pages

Alert-IPO! - GunnAllen Financial Inc
... GunnAllen Financial Inc. 1715 Westshore Blvd - Suite 775 Tampa FL 33607 USA
813-282-0808 See also: | Registration | Public | Withdrawn | Postponed |. ...
www.alert-ipo.com/cgi-bin/ ai.exe?cobrand=ostman&underwriter=3046 - 29k - Cached - Similar pages

Firm Profile - GUNNALLEN FINANCIAL INC
Profile (see Definition>>). GUNNALLEN FINANCIAL INC. 1715 WESTSHORE
BLVD - SUITE 775. TAMPA,FL,33607. USA. 813-282-0808. PRINT THIS PAGE. ...
www.mcginnsmith.com/SYNDICATE/syn/ firms.asp?ID=3046&type=u - 18k - Cached - Similar pages

Bright Start Savings
... Cloud, MN 56301 (320) 656-4300 Gunn Allen Financial, Inc. 1715 N. Westshore
Blvd. Suite 700 Tampa, FL 33607 (813) 282-0808 Harbour Investments, Inc. ...
www.brightstartsavings.com/html/participate/ participate_copy.html - 40k - Cached - Similar pages

Divorce Professional - Klimson Todd, Financial Planner
... Seventh Floor, Tampa, FL 33607 County: Hillsborough. Phone: 813-282-0808
Fax: 813-282-1275 Website: gunnallen.com. ...
www.divorcesoftware.com/db/id9474.htm - 13k - Cached - Similar pages

- 2001-05-28 - The Business Journal of Tampa Bay
... Sponsor: Tampa Bay Financial Advisors Club; Time: 5 pm; Location: The Tampa Club,
101 E. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 4200; Cost: No cost; Phone: (813) 282-0808 ext. ...
tampabay.bizjournals.com/tampabay/ stories/2001/05/28/calendar.html - 46k - Supplemental Result - Cached - Similar pages