Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: austrieconomist who wrote (11000)	5/15/2003 10:11:20 PM
From: E. Charters	Respond to of 39344

"Nothing exists in a vacuum". It that the premise or the conclusion? I thot nothing was the existence of a vacuum. Or is it everything exists in a vacuum. So, does this mean that if the stock market were totally random that it would increase our odds of making money? If it were not totally random, and this were obvious, i.e. it were as a regular sine wave, how long would it be before every person taking advantage of this fact started finding it unpredictable again? EC<:-}