Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonder who wrote (157284)	5/15/2003 12:49:18 PM
From: Oeconomicus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

Let's address that in its primary components and see if you still think she was "right": Iraq was one of the better countries in the ME as far as human rights are concerned... Remember, women's rights were, in Liz's argument, a "particularly" positive example - the statement above is general. Please name for me the countries in the middle east to which Saddam's Iraq compares favorably on human rights in general. ...particularly for women... Again, that they were equally lacking in basic human rights hardly supports the case that Liz was trying to make, which was that Iraqi women were better of under Saddam than liberated from him. Neither does your article support that case. Tell me again how she was "right."