SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Chesapeake Gold (CKG.V) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (577)5/15/2003 2:52:22 PM
From: marcos  Respond to of 7835
 
This has been an excellent thread lately, great reading, thanks folks ... nothing like an adversarial approach to bring out all the fine points on each side

Maybe some would like to try that over here - investorshub.com

.. -ggg- ... at the moment i hold a little sml, no ckg ... wouldn't mind scoring some more of both, and i will, it's just a matter of time and price ..... cheers



To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (577)5/15/2003 3:32:12 PM
From: jrhana  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7835
 
<And second, the exit path is already in place>

What does that mean please?

FWIW but my broker ahs been calling several of these managements to give them the third degree so to speak

Of all he has talked to, he was most impressed with RDU

He thinks they really have their act together.



To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (577)5/16/2003 10:39:29 AM
From: Claude Cormier  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7835
 
<Gold wasn't $350 when FGX was sold. It was at $275 and that was why it was sold. >

First gold was more $300-$325 between the initial offer and the closing. But the sell had nothing to do with the gold price I think. It had to do with Marlin which was the real prey. El Suzie was only the appetizer. GLG would have move even with gold at $350... They didn't care the price of gold, the higher the better I think as they were exchanging shares of Glamis to acquire FGX.

I agree with you on RDU.