Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Lloyd who wrote (174617)	5/15/2003 5:32:34 PM
From: hueyone	Respond to of 186894

Please justify the need for the qualifier 'nearly'. -g- Well, I think we are in agreement that it is there is some kind of inconsistency going on to have stock grants to employees result in an compensation expense on the IS, but not have stock options result in a compensation expense on the IS. Of course your solution to the inconsistency is to have neither of them result in an expense on the IS, and my solution to the inconsistency is to have both of them result in an expense on the IS, but at least we agree that there is an inconsistency. But the Austrian Economics may be too much for me at my age. You and JS with your multiple wives and divorces are giving me a headache.<g> Regards, Huey