Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (406704)	5/15/2003 4:48:43 PM
From: George Coyne	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

Clinton was proven to have lied. You have not made the case that Bush has lied. First of all, the jury is still out on the possession of WMDs. Second, how can you assume that Bush did not believe that there were WMDs? If he believed it, he did not lie. Nice try.

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (406704)	5/15/2003 5:29:51 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

"Today, we are hearing the same absurdities from the Bush apologists: They snuck them all into Syria at the last minute. They destroyed them all, as our tanks were overrunning them. We never said they had weapons of mass destruction. The jury is still out. We'll find them, eventually. Give us a few more years to look for them." Where is your proof that Bush lied about WMD's? This position is bugging me in that I will be kind of ticked if he lied about WMD, but I have seen no evidence that he did. Iraq had months to get rid of weapons before the inspectors came, more months once they were there, and then a few weeks even when the war started. Don't you see that you have no evidence to claim Bush is a liar? With Clinton there was proof. There is a BIG difference.