SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SOROS who wrote (19202)5/16/2003 12:48:51 AM
From: portage  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Soros, chiefy seems to show up in places you don't normally see him for a little taunting when new little mini bucking bulls reappear. Then I don't seem to come across his posts for months when the slide resumes.

The reckoning's still a coming. Pick your bear market rally, but get out before the ink dries.

Why does he think so many bears are permabears ?

Nobody else is thinking bullish ? LOL. Look at today's sentiment indicators.

Dow 30,000 yippeeeee !



To: SOROS who wrote (19202)5/21/2003 8:20:04 PM
From: Jim Willie CB  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
clear as day to me: next target will be Iran for invasion
if not outright invasion, then destabilization
why?

first some background
Iran provided Palestinian weapons that were seized
they have a long history harboring HezBollah outposts
they fund terrorist groups across the entire Middle East

on a more immediate basis, SIGNALS:

press is now reporting that Al Qaeda groups are operating hit & run missions out of Iran
so Iran is perceived to be harboring AlQ camps

yup, we go into Iran next
we are being set up for it now
they talked a streak about Syria for a few weeks
but they are way too dangerous, home of HezBollah and Hamas
besides, Syria has no oil

timeframe, late winter or early spring 2004
just in time to wave flags during the Bushy re-election campaign

ANYBODY WHO SPEAKS IN OPPOSITION SHOWS NO PATRIOTISM
ANYBODY WHO IS VOCAL AGAINST BUSHY DOES NOT SUPPORT THE TROOPS

ODDS: 20:1 in favor of Bushy landslide
those who think differently are clueless
they thought Democrats would pick up seats in midterm elections 2002
that was a sweep

/ jim